07.01.2014 Views

PHYS01200804001 Sohrab Abbas - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS01200804001 Sohrab Abbas - Homi Bhabha National Institute

PHYS01200804001 Sohrab Abbas - Homi Bhabha National Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

since |n 2 –1|< 10 –5 . Eq.(82) is the approximate formula hitherto used by earlier researchers. Here, b c<br />

signifies the coherent scattering length of sample, N a and b a stand for atomic number density and<br />

coherent scattering length respectively, of air and denotes the neutron wavelength. Precision of<br />

b c determination can be improved by increasing Ф I . However, in a symmetric LLL IFM, neutrons<br />

of wavelengths and + propagate at corresponding Bragg angles θ B and θ B +θ B to the IFM<br />

Bragg planes and hence are incident at angles θ and θ+θ B on the sample (Fig.51). The phase Ф I ,<br />

acquired by neutrons with wavelength + can be written as<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2 2<br />

D<br />

sin B 4d NbC NbC sin <br />

<br />

B<br />

I ,<br />

2 <br />

d sin B B sin <br />

B<br />

<br />

<br />

B<br />

<br />

(83)<br />

using Eq.(81). Here d denotes Bragg planar spacing of the IFM single crystal. The phase Ф I at<br />

+ differs from Ф I at . The -dependence of Ф I (Fig.52), thus smears out interferograms,<br />

reducing the interference contrast and hence b c precision since<br />

i I ( )<br />

i IO<br />

I<br />

O<br />

( )e d / I<br />

O( )d fe <br />

with f

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!