PHYS01200804001 Sohrab Abbas - Homi Bhabha National Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[127] A. Ioffe, D. L. Jacobson, M. Arif, M. Vrana, S. A. Werner, P. Fischer, G. L. Greene, and F. Mezei, Phys. Rev. A, 58 (1998) 1475. [128] H. Lemmel and A. G. Wagh, Phys. Rev. A, 82 (2010) 033626 (pp. 1). [129] S. Abbas, A. G. Wagh, and W. Treimer, Sol. St. Phys. (India), 54 (2009) 212. [130] M. G. Huber et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 102 (2009) 200401; O. Zimmer, G. Ehlers, B. Farago, H. Humblot, W. Ketter and R. Scherm, EPJ direct A, 1 (2002) 1. [131] M. Peshkin and G. R. Ringo, Am. J. Phys., 39 (1971) 324. [132] N. Kato, Acta Cryst., 11 (1958) 885. [133] W. Soller, Phys. Rev., 24 (1924) 158. [134] P. D. Hey, B. Mack and C. Carlile, Rutherford Laboratory Report, RL-75-20 (1975). [135] H. Meister, and B. Weckermann, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res., 108 (1973) 107. [136] A. Zeilinger and C. G. Shull, Phys. Rev. B, 19 (1979) 3957. [137] G. F. Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1979); D. H. Wilkinson, Ionization Chambers and Counters, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1950). [138] A. G. Wagh, Phys. Lett. A, 121 (1987) 45; Phys. Lett. A, 123 (1987) 499. [139] S. Abbas and A. G. Wagh, Sol. St. Phys. (India), 50 (2005) 317. [140] S. Abbas, A. G. Wagh, M. Strobl and W. Treimer, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A, 634 (2011) S144. [141] S. Abbas, A. G. Wagh, and W. Treimer, Pramana- J. Phys., 71 (2008) 1109. [142] S. Abbas, A. G. Wagh, M. Strobl and W. Treimer, Journal of Physics (CS), 251 (2010) 012073. [143] S. Abbas, A. G. Wagh, M. Strobl and W. Treimer, Sol. St. Phys. (India), 51 (2006) 351. [144] M. Strobl, W. Treimer, Ch. Ritzoulis, A. G. Wagh, S. Abbas and I. Manke, J. Apl. Cryst., 132
40 (supplement) (2007) s463. [145] A. G. Wagh, S. Abbas , M. Strobl and W. Treimer, BENSC Experimental Reports 2005 (HMI, Germany, 2006) 115. [146] A. G. Wagh, S. Abbas and W. Treimer, Journal of Physics (CS), 251 (2010) 012074. [147] A. G. Wagh, S. Abbas and W. Treimer, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A, 634 (2011) S41. [148] A. G. Wagh, S. Abbas, and W. Treimer, Pramana- J. Phys. 71 (2008) 1171. [149] A. G. Wagh and S. Abbas, Sol. St. Phys. (India), 51 (2006) 353. [150] A. G. Wagh, S. Abbas, M. Strobl and W. Treimer, BENSC Experimental Reports 2006 (HMI, Germany, 2007) 22. [151] S. Abbas, A. G. Wagh, M. Strobl and W. Treimer, Sol. St. Phys. (India), 52 (2007) 441. [152] A. G. Wagh, S. Abbas and W. Treimer, BENSC Experimental Reports 2007 (HMI, Germany, 2008) 223. [153] A. G. Wagh, S. Abbas and W. Treimer, Sol. St. Phys. (India) 53 (2008) 553. [154] S. Abbas, A. G. Wagh and W. Treimer, Sol. St. Phys. (India), 53 (2008) 555. [155] S. Abbas, A. G. Wagh and W. Treimer, Abstract book, CNSMS (2009) 112 [156] S. Abbas and A. G. Wagh, Pramana J-Phys., 63 (2004) 375. [157] H. A. Graf and J. R. Schneider, Acta Cryst. A, 37 (1981) 863. [158] A. G. Wagh and S. Abbas, J. Res. Natl. Stad. Technol. 110 (2005) 237. [159] M. Zawisky, M. Baron, R. Loidl and H. Rauch, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A, 481 (2002) 406 [160] S. Abbas, A. G. Wagh, R. Loidl, H. Lemmel and H. Rauch, AIP Conf. Proc., 1349 (2011) 501. [161] A. G. Wagh, S. Abbas R. Loidl, H. Lemmel and H. Rauch, ILL Experimental Reports 133
Page 1:
Studying neutron dynamical diffract
Page 4 and 5:
DECLARATION I, hereby declare that
Page 6 and 7:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I sincerely, thank
Page 8 and 9:
Fig.10 Boundary conditions on wave
Page 10 and 11:
Fig.28 Theoretical curves for Si {1
Page 12 and 13:
sample. Least-squares fit to the sa
Page 14 and 15:
Fig.62 Interference contrast and av
Page 16 and 17:
3.4 Experimental 49 3.5 Results and
Page 18 and 19:
SYNOPSIS The present thesis aims to
Page 20 and 21:
analytic expressions for intensity
Page 22 and 23:
Research A, 634 (2011) S41. [9] S.
Page 24 and 25:
spallation sources yield peak neutr
Page 26 and 27:
SU(2) phase, and separation of geom
Page 28 and 29:
[33-34,48]. The bi-refracting natur
Page 30 and 31:
application of the dynamical theory
Page 32 and 33:
I. One of the major disadvantages o
Page 34 and 35:
nuclear physics very important as i
Page 36 and 37:
potential for most nuclei in spite
Page 38 and 39:
Due to the rapid strides made latel
Page 40 and 41:
for a positive value of b c i.e. fo
Page 42 and 43:
k b k O H . ni sin( B S) . (18)
Page 44 and 45:
factor exp(-W). The centre, θ C ,
Page 46 and 47:
exploiting multiple successive iden
Page 48 and 49:
We shall confine our discussion hen
Page 50 and 51:
The depth Z is measured from the in
Page 52 and 53:
wings (large-y regions). The freque
Page 54 and 55:
expressed as T(y, t )R(y, t )R(
Page 56 and 57:
studies. With such beams, the and
Page 58 and 59:
CHAPTER 3 Neutron forward diffracti
Page 60 and 61:
eing the separation of points M and
Page 62 and 63:
3.1 Neutron forward diffraction Con
Page 64 and 65:
excited by the incident wave (Fig.1
Page 66 and 67:
Therefore, the forward diffracted i
Page 68 and 69:
Fig.15 Calculated cr and I O for a
Page 70 and 71:
(1 I ) D tan b . ID cot( B S)
Page 72 and 73:
Fig.18 Experimental layout to measu
Page 74 and 75:
Fig.20 Bragg reflection intensity f
Page 76 and 77:
fraction I O through the Bragg pris
Page 78 and 79:
Fig.22 Experimental (points) and th
Page 80 and 81:
Table 2: Observed deflection sensit
Page 82 and 83:
total reflectivity domain. These ar
Page 84 and 85:
Here the term C() accounts for the
Page 86 and 87:
Fig.28 Theoretical curves for Si {1
Page 88 and 89:
I H (θ H ) peaks of 0.18 height an
Page 90 and 91:
other with a compression factor lim
Page 92 and 93:
an overall compression factor of 14
Page 94 and 95:
4.3 Experimental 4.3.1 Bragg prism
Page 96 and 97:
4.3.2 Experiment The experiment was
Page 98 and 99:
Fig.38 Bragg reflection rocking cur
Page 100 and 101:
4.4 Applications of novel SUSANS se
Page 102 and 103:
Fig.42 First Q ~ 10 -6 Å -1 SUSANS
Page 104 and 105: 2 (1) -(δk i .Δ i ) /2 Γ (Δ) =
Page 106 and 107: 2 I( ) A( ) . (76) The least squa
Page 108 and 109: Fig.46 Analyser rocking curve for a
Page 110 and 111: This instrument was also employed t
Page 112 and 113: Fig.48 Theoretical flat-topped angu
Page 114 and 115: difference between the two neutron
Page 116 and 117: Fig.52 Phase dispersion in a 26.5 m
Page 118 and 119: the beam and remains visible up to
Page 120 and 121: cos bc 4NDd1 1 2cot 2 III 2 2
Page 122 and 123: yield about an order of magnitude r
Page 124 and 125: The refractive index, n = (1-Nb c
Page 126 and 127: with a white, and hence high-intens
Page 128 and 129: proposed dual sample. The dual samp
Page 130 and 131: The experiment was performed with =
Page 132 and 133: Fig.59 Typical interferograms for p
Page 134 and 135: Fig.63 Path I, II and I-II phases d
Page 136 and 137: Fig.65 Average intensity with the s
Page 138 and 139: Fig.69 New metrological mapping of
Page 140 and 141: Si at 26.2 o C, applying a correcti
Page 142 and 143: selected asymmetric Bragg prism may
Page 144 and 145: III. High precision determination o
Page 146 and 147: REFERENCES [1] H. Rauch and S. Wern
Page 148 and 149: [36] J. S. Nico and W. M. Snow, Ann
Page 150 and 151: [67] V. F. Sears, Can. J. Phys., 56
Page 152 and 153: [97] A. Cabello, S. Filipp, H. Rauc
Page 156: 2009, (Grenoble, France, 2010) 3-15
show all

PHYS01200804001 Sohrab Abbas - Homi Bhabha National Institute

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?