07.01.2014 Views

CHEM01200604012 Dibakar Goswami - Homi Bhabha National ...

CHEM01200604012 Dibakar Goswami - Homi Bhabha National ...

CHEM01200604012 Dibakar Goswami - Homi Bhabha National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

precursor to partially replenish the lost allyl bromide (Scheme II.3.5, eq. 2). The amount<br />

of alkene trapped by Br 2 was very less since very little amount of 1,2-dibromopropane was<br />

isolated. This suggested that most of propene or its precursor gets converted to allyl<br />

bromide. It is most likely that [bmim][Br] would react with propene precursor (allyl<br />

radical), producing less amount of propene.<br />

Our 1 H NMR studies also suggested the operation of eq. 2, since there was a builtup<br />

of the peak at δ 3.8 at ~1.5-2 h. This was confirmed by a time-dependent GLC analysis<br />

(Fig. II.3.6) of the reaction mixture that showed a sharp decline (60-110 min), followed by<br />

a gradual rise of the concentration of allyl bromide, which finally became steady.<br />

Evidently, at the initial stage, formation of II was very fast due to the high concentration of<br />

allyl bromide, and the growth of the latter could only be seen at a latter stage. A steady<br />

concentration of II at ~3 h (NMR results) was also in consonance with these results.<br />

Fig. II.3.6. GLC analysis of the time dependent concentration variation of allyl<br />

bromide<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!