17.01.2014 Views

The secular angel in contemporary children's literature: David ...

The secular angel in contemporary children's literature: David ...

The secular angel in contemporary children's literature: David ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

your small existences?’ ‘But you do, don’t you?’ Freya murmured. Her <strong>in</strong>sight<br />

shocked him. (McNish, 2007, 113-114)<br />

<strong>The</strong> implications of this notion of guardianship and care, both for humans and <strong>angel</strong>s, will be<br />

analysed <strong>in</strong> great detail <strong>in</strong> the chapters that follow for each author respectively.<br />

One of the central themes of the thesis is <strong>in</strong>tertextuality, and the two historical figures<br />

most alluded to are John Milton, by Philip Pullman, and William Blake, who features <strong>in</strong> both<br />

Pullman’s and Almond’s narratives. Milton’s and Blake’s <strong>angel</strong>ic representations have been<br />

discussed and analysed by critics both for their historical and ideological significance.<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g the rich and multifaceted <strong>angel</strong>ic characterization and categorization of the Middle<br />

Ages, Milton’s <strong>angel</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Paradise Lost (1667) presented historians and critics with numerous<br />

questions and theories regard<strong>in</strong>g the poet’s decision to present a legion of <strong>angel</strong>s who<br />

exhibited several human traits. Michelle Volpe writes that “most eighteenth-century readers<br />

[did not feel] comfortable with Milton’s description of <strong>angel</strong>s, specifically, the implication<br />

that they are composed of matter” (Volpe, 1998, 144). This very aspect appeared to contradict<br />

Milton’s aim to “justify the ways of God to men” (Milton, 2005, Book I, 26), as the <strong>angel</strong>s’<br />

material existence also extended to their ability to fully experience all five senses, feel sorrow<br />

and joy, and even make love. Denise Gigante writes <strong>in</strong> her article “Milton’s Aesthetics of<br />

Eat<strong>in</strong>g” that the <strong>angel</strong> Raphael “suggests that […] eat<strong>in</strong>g offers a newfound sense of pleasure<br />

[and] expla<strong>in</strong>s that <strong>angel</strong>s (who are simply a higher form of humans) enjoy partak<strong>in</strong>g with all<br />

five senses” (Gigante, 2000, 96). This is not only <strong>in</strong>dicative of Milton’s ideology, but of the<br />

fact that Pullman has drawn on the Miltonic version of <strong>angel</strong>s <strong>in</strong> His Dark Materials, who<br />

although are not seen eat<strong>in</strong>g, they do possess the ability to feel love, hate, contempt and<br />

admiration. Possibly one of the most controversial aspects regard<strong>in</strong>g Milton’s <strong>angel</strong>s, and one<br />

that Pullman also explores with the two male <strong>angel</strong>s, Baruch and Balthamos, is homosexual<br />

love. Jonathan Goldberg aims, <strong>in</strong> his book, “to track signs of male desirability and of male-<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!