17.01.2014 Views

The secular angel in contemporary children's literature: David ...

The secular angel in contemporary children's literature: David ...

The secular angel in contemporary children's literature: David ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of by doctors, Michael tries to help Skellig <strong>in</strong> return. Although he now has to worry about two<br />

people <strong>in</strong> his life, Michael seems to be treat<strong>in</strong>g the two as one and the same. He believes that<br />

if he and M<strong>in</strong>a can somehow save Skellig, the baby is also go<strong>in</strong>g to be saved.<br />

Skellig, like Michael, goes through a considerable transformation, and what is most<br />

noteworthy about his change is that it is achieved solely with the help of M<strong>in</strong>a and Michael<br />

and not with the help of magic. <strong>The</strong>re is a certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>version <strong>in</strong> Skellig’s case, because although<br />

the two children’s transformation is partly due to Skellig’s supernatural aspect, Skellig’s is<br />

entirely due to the humanity and k<strong>in</strong>dness of the two children. Although the reader is not told<br />

how Skellig came to be so broken and fragile <strong>in</strong> this dilapidated garage, or what his life was<br />

like before, the author offers an explanation as to why he didn’t receive any help before.<br />

Michael asks Skellig how he knew what 27 and 53 on the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese food menu was, and he<br />

replies that it was Ernie’s favourite food. Michael, who wonders whether Skellig is real, asks<br />

him: “ ‘Did he see you? Did he know you were there?’ ‘Never could tell. Used to look at me,<br />

but look right through me like I wasn’t there. […] Maybe thought I was a figment’” (Almond,<br />

2007, 51-52). This elucidation br<strong>in</strong>gs three matters to the surface. <strong>The</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>ty of Skellig’s<br />

existence is a question that is never truly and def<strong>in</strong>itively answered; he is either a figment of<br />

the children’s imag<strong>in</strong>ation or a creature that appears only to them but <strong>in</strong> a certa<strong>in</strong> dream state<br />

where the boundaries of reality are blurred. Even though Skellig’s description of Ernie is a<br />

piece of <strong>in</strong>formation of an event that preceded Michael —therefore an event the boy could<br />

know noth<strong>in</strong>g about— the fact that Ernie either did not actually see Skellig, believ<strong>in</strong>g him to<br />

be an illusion or a fabrication, returns the reader to their orig<strong>in</strong>al confusion and ultimate<br />

question: is Skellig real? This becomes even more significant if the reader sees Skellig as a<br />

reflection of Ernie.<br />

One of the most mov<strong>in</strong>g scenes <strong>in</strong> the novel, and where the notion of dream<strong>in</strong>g<br />

together and accept<strong>in</strong>g the very uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of it is illum<strong>in</strong>ated, is when the children decide to<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!