an analysis for india and china - icrier
an analysis for india and china - icrier
an analysis for india and china - icrier
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
glass <strong>an</strong>d glassware <strong>an</strong>d tin <strong>an</strong>d articles thereof. In the category of machinery <strong>an</strong>d<br />
equipment, China has attained comparative adv<strong>an</strong>tage in nuclear reactors, boilers,<br />
machinery, etc in 2003. In the chemicals <strong>an</strong>d plastics category, China is adv<strong>an</strong>tageously<br />
placed in the world market vis-à-vis India only <strong>for</strong> explosives, pyrotechnics, matches,<br />
pyrophorics, etc in 2003. The comparative adv<strong>an</strong>tage enjoyed by China in 2000 in<br />
inorg<strong>an</strong>ic chemicals, precious metal compound, isotopes is however lost in 2003. India<br />
on the other h<strong>an</strong>d holds relative comparative adv<strong>an</strong>tage <strong>for</strong> org<strong>an</strong>ic chemicals <strong>an</strong>d<br />
t<strong>an</strong>ning, dyeing extracts, t<strong>an</strong>nins, derivs, pigments etc.<br />
The <strong>an</strong>alysis of comparative adv<strong>an</strong>tage <strong>for</strong> m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing sector according to<br />
factor intensity reveals subst<strong>an</strong>tial similarities in the structure of international<br />
specialization <strong>for</strong> both India <strong>an</strong>d China. Across all levels <strong>an</strong>d systems of classification the<br />
comparative adv<strong>an</strong>tage <strong>for</strong> both the countries is observed to be predomin<strong>an</strong>tly in the labor<br />
<strong>an</strong>d resource intensive m<strong>an</strong>ufactures. Sectors like textiles (yarn, fabric, made-up articles<br />
n.e.s <strong>an</strong>d related products) <strong>an</strong>d articles of apparel <strong>an</strong>d clothing accessories dominate in<br />
these categories <strong>for</strong> both the countries. The next largest category is that of m<strong>an</strong>ufactures<br />
that makes a high dem<strong>an</strong>d <strong>for</strong> skill, technology, capital <strong>an</strong>d scale. Org<strong>an</strong>ic chemicals<br />
followed by inorg<strong>an</strong>ic chemicals occupies a predomin<strong>an</strong>t position in this category. At a<br />
more disaggregated level India’s comparative adv<strong>an</strong>tage is observed to be in the unskilled<br />
labor intensive commodity category.<br />
For the science-based m<strong>an</strong>ufactures India <strong>an</strong>d China are adv<strong>an</strong>tageously placed in<br />
the same commodity sectors. Science- based industries contribute less th<strong>an</strong> 10 per cent of<br />
the comparative adv<strong>an</strong>tage in the m<strong>an</strong>ufacturing sector in India <strong>an</strong>d China. In absolute<br />
terms though, China’s science based industries are almost double the number in India. In<br />
the Indi<strong>an</strong> context, the category of medicinal <strong>an</strong>d pharmaceutical products is predomin<strong>an</strong>t<br />
while in China the category- photographic apparatus, equipment <strong>an</strong>d optical goods<br />
dominates. In the leading science- based commodity categories, China enjoys more th<strong>an</strong><br />
double the comparative adv<strong>an</strong>tage that India enjoys in the same category.<br />
49