21.01.2014 Views

OES Annual Report 2012 - Ocean Energy Systems

OES Annual Report 2012 - Ocean Energy Systems

OES Annual Report 2012 - Ocean Energy Systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

51<br />

04 / COUNTRY REPORTS<br />

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA<br />

Michael Reed<br />

U.S. Department of <strong>Energy</strong> (DOE)<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In <strong>2012</strong> the U.S. ocean energy industry accomplished several significant achievements, including: multiple<br />

open water deployments, advancements in infrastructure development, initial grid connectivity, landmark<br />

power purchase agreements (PPA), and milestones in permitting and licensing. The open water deployments<br />

have provided valuable baseline performance data and in-water test experience to inform future design<br />

improvements. Furthermore, this was the first year developers (Verdant Power, <strong>Ocean</strong> Renewable Power<br />

Company, and <strong>Ocean</strong> Power Technologies) received hydrokinetic licenses issued by the Federal <strong>Energy</strong><br />

Regulatory Commission (FERC), which resulted in the development of 5.55 MW of demonstration projects.<br />

Overall, there were approximately 85 active FERC-issued hydrokinetic preliminary permits in <strong>2012</strong>, totalling<br />

roughly 14.8 GW. Throughout <strong>2012</strong> technology development progressed with the addition of an ocean<br />

energy technical data exchange forum (Annex V) to the International <strong>Energy</strong> Agency’s <strong>Ocean</strong> <strong>Energy</strong><br />

<strong>Systems</strong> – Implementing Agreement. Additionally, the device cost reference model efforts continued and<br />

a new collaborative initiative to develop an open source numerical modeling package (WECSim) began.<br />

The WECSim initiative will simulate power production for multiple wave energy converter architectures and<br />

is a collaborative effort among the National Renewable <strong>Energy</strong> Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories,<br />

and other code developers. Additionally, resource assessments for ocean current, river current, and ocean<br />

thermal progressed and will be complete during late <strong>2012</strong> and early 2013. Environmental research and<br />

information sharing continued with the launch of the Department of <strong>Energy</strong>’s (DOE) Tethys database and<br />

the extension of Annex IV activities, with the final report and data to be publicly released in 2013. The<br />

outlook for 2013 is optimistic, with further testing of a number of devices planned and some projects<br />

expanding to arrays and commercial-scale devices.<br />

OCEAN ENERGY POLICY<br />

Strategy and National Targets<br />

This mission of the DOE Water Power Program is to research, test, evaluate, develop and demonstrate<br />

innovative technologies capable of generating renewable, environmentally responsible and cost-effective<br />

electricity from water resources. Pursuant to that mission, the Program is currently undertaking the<br />

necessary analysis to assess the opportunities associated with tapping ocean energy resources. The<br />

completion of significant advanced assessments of U.S. wave and tidal energy resources has resulted in<br />

a programmatic decision to focus technology development efforts largely on the abundant national wave<br />

energy resource. Based on these analyses, the Program has established a national marine and hydrokinetic<br />

(MHK) deployment goal of 23 GW by 2030.<br />

The strategy of the Water Power Program is broken down into four major thrust areas:<br />

1. Technology Advancement<br />

2. Testing Infrastructure and Instrumentation Development<br />

3. Resource Characterization<br />

4. Market Barrier Identification and Removal<br />

The <strong>2012</strong> DOE MHK portfolio consisted of 115 projects and represented a total Program investment of $34<br />

million. Most of the MHK funding (80%) was directed toward major thrust areas 1 and 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!