23.01.2014 Views

Estimation in Financial Models - RiskLab

Estimation in Financial Models - RiskLab

Estimation in Financial Models - RiskLab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1) fX kh g: the family of discrete time processes fX kh g depend<strong>in</strong>g on h and<br />

on the discrete time <strong>in</strong>dex kh, k 2 IN.<br />

2) fX (h)<br />

t g: the family of cont<strong>in</strong>uous time processes fX (h)<br />

t g that are step<br />

functions constructed from the discrete time process fX kh g as described<br />

above. Observe that fX (h)<br />

t g depends both on h and on the cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

time <strong>in</strong>dex t 0.<br />

3) fX t g: the limit<strong>in</strong>g process fX t g, to which under some conditions as will<br />

be shown <strong>in</strong> the theorem below, the sequence of processes fX (h)<br />

t g for<br />

h # 0weakly converges.<br />

Instead of giv<strong>in</strong>g the explicit mathematical conditions needed <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

theorem (for details see Nelson [54], pp.10-15) we briey describe<br />

and <strong>in</strong>terpret them. Functions a h (x; t) and b h (x; t) are dened as measures<br />

of the second moment and the drift, respectively, and are required to converge<br />

uniformly on compact sets to well-behaved cont<strong>in</strong>uous functions a(x; t)<br />

and b(x; t). Moreover, there shall exist a cont<strong>in</strong>uous function (x; t) with<br />

a(x; t) = (x; t)(x; t) T . The sample paths of the limit process X t are assumed<br />

to be cont<strong>in</strong>uous with probability one. We require the probability<br />

measures of the <strong>in</strong>itial po<strong>in</strong>ts X (h)<br />

0 to converge to a limit measure 0 as h # 0<br />

and thus have determ<strong>in</strong>ed the <strong>in</strong>itial distribution 0 of X t . F<strong>in</strong>ally, certa<strong>in</strong><br />

conditions are needed so that 0 , a(x; t) and b(x; t) uniquely dene the distribution<br />

of the limit process X t .<br />

Theorem 1 Under the assumptions <strong>in</strong>dicated above the family fX (h)<br />

t g converges<br />

weakly as h # 0 to the process fX t g dened by the stochastic dierential<br />

equation<br />

X t = X 0 +<br />

Z t<br />

0<br />

b(X s ;s) ds +<br />

Z t<br />

0<br />

(X s ;s) dW (n)<br />

s ;<br />

where W (n)<br />

t is an n-dimensional Wiener process <strong>in</strong>dependent of X 0 , and fX t g<br />

has <strong>in</strong>itial distribution 0 . The process fX t g exists, is distributionally unique<br />

and rema<strong>in</strong>s with probability one nite <strong>in</strong> nite time <strong>in</strong>tervals.<br />

We remark that the distribution of X t does not depend on the choice of<br />

, see assumptions above. Moreover, note that convergence <strong>in</strong> distribution<br />

means convergence regard<strong>in</strong>g the whole sample path, that means the probability<br />

laws generat<strong>in</strong>g the sample paths fX (h)<br />

t g converge to the probability<br />

law generat<strong>in</strong>g the sample path of fX t ,0 t T g for any 0 T < 1. Furthermore,<br />

we remark that Nelson [54] shows the same result based on simpler<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!