Estimation in Financial Models - RiskLab
Estimation in Financial Models - RiskLab
Estimation in Financial Models - RiskLab
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
and by substitut<strong>in</strong>g the l<strong>in</strong>ear variance function, F bb is consistently estimated<br />
by<br />
^F bb = 1 T<br />
2<br />
X<br />
t<br />
4 x0 tx t<br />
h t<br />
+2 X j<br />
2 j<br />
3<br />
" 2 t,j<br />
x 0<br />
h<br />
t,jx 2 t,j<br />
5 :<br />
t<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally we give a remark to the ML estimation for the GARCH regression<br />
model<br />
" t = y t , x 0 tb;<br />
h t = v 0 t;<br />
with v t and as above. In order to estimate the mean parameters b we<br />
dierentiate with respect to b as shown for the ARCH regression model with<br />
the s<strong>in</strong>gle dierence<br />
@h t<br />
qX<br />
pX<br />
@b = ,2 @h t,j<br />
j x t,j " t,j + j<br />
@b :<br />
j=1<br />
Pay<strong>in</strong>g attention to this dierence, the part of the Fisher <strong>in</strong>formation matrix<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g to b is consistently estimated as <strong>in</strong> the ARCH regression model.<br />
We denote by F , respectively F , the part of the Fisher <strong>in</strong>formation matrix<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g to , respectively , and the elements <strong>in</strong> the o-diagonal<br />
block of the <strong>in</strong>formation matrix by F b , respectively by F b . The elements<br />
F b , respectively F b , may be shown to be zero. Because of this asymptotic<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependence , respectively , can be estimated without loss of asymptotic<br />
eciency based on a consistent estimate of b and vice versa. Us<strong>in</strong>g this fact<br />
Engle [22], x6, formulates a simple scor<strong>in</strong>g algorithm for the ML estimation<br />
of the parameters and b.<br />
As for the properties of the estimators, Bollerslev [14] remarks that for the<br />
general ARCH class of models the verication of sucient regularity conditions<br />
for the MLE to be consistent and asymptotically normally distributed<br />
is very dicult. A detailed proof is only worked out <strong>in</strong> a few cases. Normally<br />
one assumes that these regularity conditions are satised, such that<br />
the ML estimators ^, respectively ^, and ^b are consistent and asymptotically<br />
normally distributed with limit<strong>in</strong>g distribution<br />
p<br />
T (^ , ) ,! N(0; F<br />
,1<br />
); resp. p T (^ , ) ,! N(0; F ,1 );<br />
j=1<br />
and p T (^b , b) ,! N(0; F ,1<br />
bb ): (3.76)<br />
Clos<strong>in</strong>g our considerations about estimation <strong>in</strong> ARCH/GARCH models we<br />
remark that Geweke [31] developes Bayesian <strong>in</strong>ference procedures for ARCH<br />
models by us<strong>in</strong>g Monte Carlo methods to determ<strong>in</strong>e the a posteriori distribution.<br />
The Bayesian analysis is discussed <strong>in</strong> the next section.<br />
49