23.01.2014 Views

advances in numerical modeling of manufacturing processes

advances in numerical modeling of manufacturing processes

advances in numerical modeling of manufacturing processes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TRANS. INDIAN INST. MET., VOL. 57, NO. 4, AUGUST 2004<br />

contact with workpiece due to the applied water<br />

coolant on the rake face.<br />

b. Heat exchange with air condition is assigned to<br />

the rest <strong>of</strong> the nodes on the tool surface. If a<br />

specific node is <strong>in</strong> touch with the workpiece<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the cutt<strong>in</strong>g cycle, heat transfer calculation<br />

will be automatically conducted by the program.<br />

Otherwise, the heat exchange with air calculation<br />

will be performed.<br />

Variables<br />

Depth <strong>of</strong> cut<br />

Rake angle<br />

Relief angle<br />

Tip radius<br />

Coat<strong>in</strong>g thickness<br />

Cutt<strong>in</strong>g speed<br />

Table 1<br />

CUTTING CONDITIONS<br />

Value<br />

0.35 mm<br />

5 o<br />

6 o<br />

0.005 mm<br />

0.05 mm<br />

12 m/m<strong>in</strong>, 60 m/m<strong>in</strong>, 120<br />

m/m<strong>in</strong>., 240 m/m<strong>in</strong>., 600<br />

m/m<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Table 2<br />

TOOL MATERIAL PROPERTIES<br />

Materials Tool substrate Coat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Elastic modulus 558 (GPa) 672 (GPa)<br />

The experiments were conducted on a CNC Turn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Center at cutt<strong>in</strong>g speeds <strong>of</strong> 60, 120 and 240 m/m<strong>in</strong>,<br />

feeds <strong>of</strong> 0.127 and 0.35 mm/rev and depth <strong>of</strong> cut <strong>of</strong><br />

2.54 mm. The cutt<strong>in</strong>g forces were measured with a<br />

Kistler dynamometer, Type 9121. Workpiece was a<br />

Ti-6Al-4V annealed rod. The results <strong>of</strong> these<br />

experiments and the model predictions are presented<br />

<strong>in</strong> Fig. 11. The difference <strong>in</strong> force magnitudes<br />

between those measured experimentally and predicted<br />

is less than 5% for both the feeds.<br />

Figure 12 compares <strong>of</strong> chip morphology measured<br />

and predicted by the <strong>numerical</strong> model. The shape<br />

and the pitch <strong>of</strong> the serrated chip segments <strong>in</strong> these<br />

figures show good geometric resemblance as well as<br />

reasonably close dimensional attributes. It should be<br />

noted that the orig<strong>in</strong>al chip collected from the turn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

test was a curled chip. The collected chip was then<br />

straightened and mounted. After etch<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

polish<strong>in</strong>g, the chip morphology shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 12(a)<br />

was obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the mounted chip. The<br />

straighten<strong>in</strong>g process <strong>in</strong>creases the distance between<br />

chip serration and reduces the thickness <strong>of</strong> the segment<br />

connect<strong>in</strong>g the serration.<br />

3.4 Benefits to Industry<br />

The developed <strong>numerical</strong> model with phase<br />

transformation implicitly <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the flow stress<br />

and fracture is be<strong>in</strong>g used to address <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />

Poisson’s ratio 0.22 0.22<br />

Thermal conductivity 80 36, 80, 130<br />

(W/m/ o K) (W/m/ o K)<br />

Heat capacity 2.7910 6 2.7910 6<br />

J/m 3 / o K J/m 3 / o K<br />

Thermal expansion<br />

6.8´10 -6 (/K) 6.8´10 -6 (/K)<br />

3.4 Validation <strong>of</strong> the Numerical Model<br />

Several assumptions are made for the FEM model<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g rigid-viscoplastic workpiece, rigid tool, and<br />

the stra<strong>in</strong> rate and temperature dependent flow stress.<br />

The model was verified by compar<strong>in</strong>g predictions <strong>of</strong><br />

cutt<strong>in</strong>g forces and chip morphology (metal flow) with<br />

carefully conducted experiments <strong>in</strong> the mach<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

laboratory.<br />

Fig. 11: A comparison <strong>of</strong> measured and predicted cutt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

forces at different feed rates and cutt<strong>in</strong>g speeds<br />

354

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!