23.01.2014 Views

advances in numerical modeling of manufacturing processes

advances in numerical modeling of manufacturing processes

advances in numerical modeling of manufacturing processes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RAJIV SHIVPURI : NUMERICAL MODELING OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES<br />

Measurements <strong>of</strong> roll loads were made on the roll<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mill. The process was simulated us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

ROLPAS first with and then without microstructure<br />

model<strong>in</strong>g. It was seen that the predictions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

roll<strong>in</strong>g loads with microstructure model<strong>in</strong>g were<br />

with<strong>in</strong> 10% <strong>of</strong> the measurements while, the<br />

predictions without microstructure model<strong>in</strong>g were<br />

consistently much higher (Fig. 5(a)) 5,26 .<br />

Fig. 3 : Effect <strong>of</strong> temperature on flow stress.<br />

Experience with process model<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g FEM has<br />

shown that predictions <strong>of</strong> material spread are strongly<br />

dependent upon the flow stress model. A three pass<br />

rough roll<strong>in</strong>g schedule be<strong>in</strong>g used <strong>in</strong> a steel company<br />

to convert a 6-5/8"x 6-5/8" square billet to a 5"<br />

diameter round billet was chosen to illustrate the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> microstructure model<strong>in</strong>g on the material<br />

flow. Figure 5(b) shows the mesh at the exit <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rolls <strong>in</strong> the second pass as predicted by the f<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

element model with and without microstructure<br />

model<strong>in</strong>g. A sketch <strong>of</strong> the actual shape seen at the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> the second pass is also shown. It can be easily<br />

seen that the f<strong>in</strong>ite element model without<br />

microstructure model<strong>in</strong>g grossly under predicts the<br />

material spread. It also fails to predict the bulge<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the workpiece. On the other hand,<br />

predictions <strong>of</strong> material spread with microstructure<br />

model<strong>in</strong>g are more accurate and the shape predicted<br />

is closer to what is seen <strong>in</strong> practice.<br />

2.5 Benefits to Industry<br />

Fig. 4 : Flow stress predictions vs. measurements under<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g stra<strong>in</strong> rates<br />

analysis module computes recrystallized fraction and<br />

the austenite gra<strong>in</strong> size at each node <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terstand<br />

region. In the event <strong>of</strong> complete recrystallization,<br />

gra<strong>in</strong> growth after recrystallization becomes important<br />

<strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the recrystallization k<strong>in</strong>etics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

next pass. Partial recrystallization is handled us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the rule <strong>of</strong> mixtures as described earlier.<br />

The non-<strong>in</strong>tegrated approach used <strong>in</strong> earlier studies<br />

resulted <strong>in</strong> higher predictions <strong>of</strong> roll<strong>in</strong>g loads us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

FEM. A seven pass rough roll<strong>in</strong>g sequence from a<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g steel company was chosen to study the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> microstructure model<strong>in</strong>g on the load predictions.<br />

The roll pass sequence converts a 15"x15" <strong>in</strong>got <strong>in</strong>to<br />

a 12" round bar <strong>in</strong> seven rough roll<strong>in</strong>g passes.<br />

The microstructural based <strong>numerical</strong> model <strong>of</strong> multipass<br />

hot roll<strong>in</strong>g and post roll<strong>in</strong>g transformation provide<br />

the roll<strong>in</strong>g mills the tools to carryout the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

tasks:<br />

• Design and verification <strong>of</strong> roll pass sequence for<br />

given product geometry and dimensions. F<strong>in</strong>ish<br />

dimensions and temperature are <strong>of</strong>ten the design<br />

response.<br />

• Design <strong>of</strong> thermo-mechanical process<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

improved product properties and quality.<br />

Microstructure and f<strong>in</strong>al mechanical properties<br />

are control parameters.<br />

• Reduction <strong>of</strong> product defects such as seams, f<strong>in</strong>s,<br />

segregations and cobbles.<br />

• Process control for reduced variability and scrap.<br />

349

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!