24.01.2014 Views

Full document - International Hospital Federation

Full document - International Hospital Federation

Full document - International Hospital Federation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Innovation and clinical specialities: oncology<br />

Table 5: Microscopic criteria for grading of invasive carcinoma<br />

LOCAL-REGIONAL TREATMENT<br />

SYSTEMIC TREATMENT (ADJUVANT)<br />

Level of resource Surgery Radiation therphy Chemotherphy Endocrine therphy<br />

Basic Modified radical mastectomy Neoadjuvant AC, Ovarian therapy<br />

FAC or classical CMF* Tamoxifen<br />

Limited<br />

Postmasectomy irradiation of the chest<br />

wall and regional nodes<br />

Enhanced Breast-conserving theraphy** Breast-conserving whole-breast irradiation Tamoxifen Aromatese inhibitors<br />

LH-RH agonists<br />

Maximal Reconstructive surgery Growth factors<br />

Dose-dense chemotherapy<br />

*Requires blood chemistry profile and complete blodd count (CBC) testing<br />

** Breast-conserving therapy requires mamography and reporting of margin status.<br />

AC, doxonubian and cyclosphamida; CMF, cyclophamide, methotrexate, and 5- fluorourcil; EC, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide; FAC, 5 - fluorourcil doxonubicin, and cyclophosphamide;<br />

LH+RG, lutelnizing hormone-releasing hormone<br />

patients is 94%; for stage IIa patients, 85%; and for stage IIb<br />

patients, 70%, while for stage IIIa patients the 5-year survival rate<br />

is 52%; for stage IIIb patients, 48%; and for stage IV patients, 18%.<br />

Prognostic Iindicators:<br />

Tumor size<br />

Prognosis deteriorates with increasing tumor size, which is an<br />

independent predictor of survival in node-negative patients and<br />

correlates with the incidence of nodal metastases.<br />

Staging<br />

The status of the axillary lymph nodes is one of the most useful<br />

prognostic indicators for breast cancer, with average 10-year<br />

survival rates of 60-70% for node-negative patients, dropping to<br />

20-30% in node-positive patients.<br />

Histopathology<br />

✚ Histologic type<br />

• Carcinoma in situ, because it is a preinvasive condition, is<br />

curable if completely removed, although 16% of patients with<br />

carcinoma in situ develop invasive recurrence after local<br />

excision of ductal carcinoma in situ, usually high grade.<br />

Similarly, 18% of patients develop invasive recurrence after<br />

lobular carcinoma in situ excision.<br />

• Well-differentiated invasive cancers have a relatively good<br />

prognosis if they are tubular, mucinous, cribriform, or<br />

secretory.<br />

• Medullary carcinoma is probably of intermediate prognosis, but<br />

different studies have used different criteria for its definition.<br />

• Invasive ductal and invasive lobular carcinomas have a less<br />

favorable prognosis but are influenced heavily by other factors.<br />

✚ Cytologic grade<br />

• Cytologic grade is the best predictor of disease prognosis in<br />

carcinoma in situ but is dependent on the grading system<br />

used, such as the Van Nuys classification (high-grade, lowgrade<br />

comedo, low-grade noncomedo).<br />

• The grading of invasive carcinoma is also important as a<br />

prognostic indicator, with higher grades indicating a worse<br />

prognosis. Microscopic criteria for grading are shown in<br />

Table 5.<br />

✚ Lymphovascular: Lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion,<br />

microvessel quantification, and lymphoplasmacytic infiltration<br />

are associated with a worse prognosis.<br />

✚ Hormone receptor status: With the aid of gene expression<br />

studies using DNA microarrays and immunohistochemistry,<br />

several distinct biologic breast cancer subtypes have been<br />

identified. These subtypes differ markedly in prognosis and in<br />

the number of potential therapeutic targets they express.<br />

The intrinsic subtypes include 2 main subtypes of estrogen<br />

receptor (ER)–negative tumors (basal-likeand human epidermal<br />

growth factor receptor-2 positive/ER- [HER2_/ER-] subtype) and<br />

at least 2 types of ER+ tumors (luminal A and luminal B). The basal<br />

like subtype carries poor biologic (worse grade) and clinical<br />

prognostic indicators like positive axillary nodes.<br />

This subtype was found to be more prevalent in pre-menopausal<br />

African-American women compared to post menopausal African-<br />

American women and other races. 122 This finding may be one of the<br />

reasons why African-American women with breast cancer have<br />

high grade, late stage tumor and with poor prognosis and poor<br />

survival outcome.<br />

The similar clinical outcome of native African women with breast<br />

cancer may tempt one to extrapolate these findings seen in<br />

African-American women. To lend credence to this fact, the few<br />

studies on hormone receptor status of breast cancer in native<br />

African women show that the majority of them are Estrogen or<br />

Progesterone negative 123-125 .<br />

There are also several other provocative parallels between<br />

African-American and native African breast cancer patients which<br />

include a younger age distribution and a greater prevalence of high<br />

grade, estrogen-receptor-negative disease among breast cancer<br />

patients in the Ghanaian and Nigerian populations of western<br />

Africa similar to the patterns of breast cancer reported among<br />

African-American women. Western African populations served as<br />

the source for most of the slave trade to colonial North America,<br />

and therefore share a common ancestry with present-generation<br />

African Americans. These parallels suggest the possible<br />

contribution of founder effects. 16<br />

However, further research needs to be done in this area before<br />

reaching any conclusion is reached as the African-Americans are<br />

102 <strong>Hospital</strong> and Healthcare Innovation Book 2009/2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!