Full document - International Hospital Federation
Full document - International Hospital Federation
Full document - International Hospital Federation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Innovation and clinical specialities: oncology<br />
Table 5: Microscopic criteria for grading of invasive carcinoma<br />
LOCAL-REGIONAL TREATMENT<br />
SYSTEMIC TREATMENT (ADJUVANT)<br />
Level of resource Surgery Radiation therphy Chemotherphy Endocrine therphy<br />
Basic Modified radical mastectomy Neoadjuvant AC, Ovarian therapy<br />
FAC or classical CMF* Tamoxifen<br />
Limited<br />
Postmasectomy irradiation of the chest<br />
wall and regional nodes<br />
Enhanced Breast-conserving theraphy** Breast-conserving whole-breast irradiation Tamoxifen Aromatese inhibitors<br />
LH-RH agonists<br />
Maximal Reconstructive surgery Growth factors<br />
Dose-dense chemotherapy<br />
*Requires blood chemistry profile and complete blodd count (CBC) testing<br />
** Breast-conserving therapy requires mamography and reporting of margin status.<br />
AC, doxonubian and cyclosphamida; CMF, cyclophamide, methotrexate, and 5- fluorourcil; EC, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide; FAC, 5 - fluorourcil doxonubicin, and cyclophosphamide;<br />
LH+RG, lutelnizing hormone-releasing hormone<br />
patients is 94%; for stage IIa patients, 85%; and for stage IIb<br />
patients, 70%, while for stage IIIa patients the 5-year survival rate<br />
is 52%; for stage IIIb patients, 48%; and for stage IV patients, 18%.<br />
Prognostic Iindicators:<br />
Tumor size<br />
Prognosis deteriorates with increasing tumor size, which is an<br />
independent predictor of survival in node-negative patients and<br />
correlates with the incidence of nodal metastases.<br />
Staging<br />
The status of the axillary lymph nodes is one of the most useful<br />
prognostic indicators for breast cancer, with average 10-year<br />
survival rates of 60-70% for node-negative patients, dropping to<br />
20-30% in node-positive patients.<br />
Histopathology<br />
✚ Histologic type<br />
• Carcinoma in situ, because it is a preinvasive condition, is<br />
curable if completely removed, although 16% of patients with<br />
carcinoma in situ develop invasive recurrence after local<br />
excision of ductal carcinoma in situ, usually high grade.<br />
Similarly, 18% of patients develop invasive recurrence after<br />
lobular carcinoma in situ excision.<br />
• Well-differentiated invasive cancers have a relatively good<br />
prognosis if they are tubular, mucinous, cribriform, or<br />
secretory.<br />
• Medullary carcinoma is probably of intermediate prognosis, but<br />
different studies have used different criteria for its definition.<br />
• Invasive ductal and invasive lobular carcinomas have a less<br />
favorable prognosis but are influenced heavily by other factors.<br />
✚ Cytologic grade<br />
• Cytologic grade is the best predictor of disease prognosis in<br />
carcinoma in situ but is dependent on the grading system<br />
used, such as the Van Nuys classification (high-grade, lowgrade<br />
comedo, low-grade noncomedo).<br />
• The grading of invasive carcinoma is also important as a<br />
prognostic indicator, with higher grades indicating a worse<br />
prognosis. Microscopic criteria for grading are shown in<br />
Table 5.<br />
✚ Lymphovascular: Lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion,<br />
microvessel quantification, and lymphoplasmacytic infiltration<br />
are associated with a worse prognosis.<br />
✚ Hormone receptor status: With the aid of gene expression<br />
studies using DNA microarrays and immunohistochemistry,<br />
several distinct biologic breast cancer subtypes have been<br />
identified. These subtypes differ markedly in prognosis and in<br />
the number of potential therapeutic targets they express.<br />
The intrinsic subtypes include 2 main subtypes of estrogen<br />
receptor (ER)–negative tumors (basal-likeand human epidermal<br />
growth factor receptor-2 positive/ER- [HER2_/ER-] subtype) and<br />
at least 2 types of ER+ tumors (luminal A and luminal B). The basal<br />
like subtype carries poor biologic (worse grade) and clinical<br />
prognostic indicators like positive axillary nodes.<br />
This subtype was found to be more prevalent in pre-menopausal<br />
African-American women compared to post menopausal African-<br />
American women and other races. 122 This finding may be one of the<br />
reasons why African-American women with breast cancer have<br />
high grade, late stage tumor and with poor prognosis and poor<br />
survival outcome.<br />
The similar clinical outcome of native African women with breast<br />
cancer may tempt one to extrapolate these findings seen in<br />
African-American women. To lend credence to this fact, the few<br />
studies on hormone receptor status of breast cancer in native<br />
African women show that the majority of them are Estrogen or<br />
Progesterone negative 123-125 .<br />
There are also several other provocative parallels between<br />
African-American and native African breast cancer patients which<br />
include a younger age distribution and a greater prevalence of high<br />
grade, estrogen-receptor-negative disease among breast cancer<br />
patients in the Ghanaian and Nigerian populations of western<br />
Africa similar to the patterns of breast cancer reported among<br />
African-American women. Western African populations served as<br />
the source for most of the slave trade to colonial North America,<br />
and therefore share a common ancestry with present-generation<br />
African Americans. These parallels suggest the possible<br />
contribution of founder effects. 16<br />
However, further research needs to be done in this area before<br />
reaching any conclusion is reached as the African-Americans are<br />
102 <strong>Hospital</strong> and Healthcare Innovation Book 2009/2010