24.01.2014 Views

Full document - International Hospital Federation

Full document - International Hospital Federation

Full document - International Hospital Federation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Innovation and strategy: risk management<br />

A comprehensive risk and emergency<br />

management programme for<br />

hospitals: a new approach<br />

ARTICLE BY MARCEL R DUBOULOZ<br />

Senior Medical Consultant, Health Development Counseling and Audit (HDCA) – Geneva<br />

This article looks at risk management in hospitals and the management of emergencies and disasters. It<br />

considers the models and policies that exist in private companies and the core components of a risk<br />

management strategy for hospitals. Building on this knowledge the author puts forward a new plan for<br />

hospitals called the Comprehensive Risk and Emergency Management Programme (CREMP) and explains the<br />

advantages of this approach.<br />

The World Health Organization (WHO) has, over the years,<br />

advocated adoption, by all Members States, laws and<br />

regulations for safer hospitals during major crisis and<br />

disasters. The United Nations <strong>International</strong> Strategy for Disaster<br />

Reduction (UNISDR) and WHO launched the 2008-2009<br />

campaign for “safe hospitals”, the primary focus of which is the<br />

reduction in “vulnerabilities” 1 , that result in major loss of life,<br />

services in hospitals. Global indicators show that lack or weak<br />

management of vulnerabilities in hospitals lead to catastrophic<br />

loss in services in both high and low-income countries. The 2009<br />

World Health Day was dedicated to “safe hospitals”. Besides<br />

providing care, hospitals also have a major role to play in<br />

management of public health programmes during disasters and<br />

health crisis. With hospitals acting as key sources of information in<br />

the surveillance system 2 , priority is now increasingly being given to<br />

development of the concepts of continuity of delivery of essential<br />

services and surge capacity. <strong>Hospital</strong>s are not isolated islands:<br />

therefore the objective should be to develop a global health<br />

system, prepared for disasters and major emergencies. There<br />

must be a continuum between the concept of “safer hospitals”<br />

(focus on reducing vulnerabilities) and mass casualty<br />

management. Management of hospital vulnerabilities is best<br />

addressed and controlled when brought into the broader concept<br />

of hospital risk management.<br />

Risk management in hospitals<br />

Many countries, over the years, have developed complex laws and<br />

regulations to regulate and control medical and other healthrelated<br />

activities 3 , such as medical practice, blood safety, quality<br />

assurance, safety and security, and accreditation. Ministries of<br />

Health (MoH) and/or specialized governmental institutions are<br />

often the bodies mandated to monitor compliance 4 . The majority<br />

of countries, however, have yet to develop exhaustive<br />

administrative and technical guidelines for full implementation of<br />

such policies as well as to identify and produce <strong>document</strong>ation on<br />

best practices.<br />

Management of emergencies and disasters<br />

Many countries have developed national multi-sectoral policies on<br />

management of emergencies 5 , particularly for mass casualty<br />

management (MCM) – also referred as Comprehensive<br />

Emergency Management Programme 6 (CEMP). The Ministry of<br />

Interior or a special Unit in the office of the Prime Minister is usually<br />

entrusted with the responsibility of developing and implementing<br />

the policies, from conception of plans to response management 7 .<br />

Some countries or States in USA have also adopted similar<br />

CEMPs for major governmental Institutions 8 . The trend is more<br />

and more to decentralize the response capacity 9 for MCMs. In<br />

these countries usually the MoHs have also developed their<br />

respective MCM policies, Emergency Medical Services (EMS)<br />

policies, and <strong>Hospital</strong> Emergency Response Plans 10 . The<br />

increasing trend is towards development of management of<br />

emergencies in hospitals within the framework of CEMPs 11 .<br />

Risk management in hospitals<br />

In parallel to development of the emergency (disaster)<br />

management strategies, many hospitals have introduced risk<br />

management approaches usually under the umbrella of<br />

Comprehensive 12 Risk Management Programmes 13 ”, the targets of<br />

which are regulated risks 14,15 , with the creation of specific<br />

committees for the different regulated risks. Many countries have<br />

national policies on risk management in hospitals, with technical<br />

guidelines for implementation 16 . The risks incorporated in these<br />

policies are primarily routine medical and clinical risks and the<br />

regulated risks. Disasters are not included in these programmes.<br />

<strong>Hospital</strong> accreditation is also a risk management-related<br />

regulatory tool applied in many countries. The prerequisite,<br />

however, for accreditation is the existence of a risk management<br />

programme as well as the existence of a hospital disaster plan.<br />

Often the process of accreditation is linked to the concept of<br />

quality assurance. Various methods (including checklists 17 ) are<br />

used to assess and monitor. Development of quality improvement<br />

strategies is gaining in importance with MoHs and hospitals. There<br />

<strong>Hospital</strong> and Healthcare Innovation Book 2009/2010 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!