Full document - International Hospital Federation
Full document - International Hospital Federation
Full document - International Hospital Federation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Innovation and clinical specialities: burns<br />
AIDS should be treated in the same manner with similar outcomes<br />
expected. Further research is needed to understand the effect of<br />
HIV on immunosuppression in its early stages of disease.<br />
Surgical management<br />
After hemodynamic stabilization, a burned patient’s priority of<br />
treatment shifts to ‘burn-wound-management’ 46 . Preoperatively,<br />
several factors can pose a challenge to surgical patient care. In<br />
the developing world, many of the burns present late, already<br />
infected, or the poor general health of the patients makes them<br />
unfit for anesthesia. In addition, blood loss can be significant in<br />
burn wound excision, especially since inflamed and infected<br />
wounds tend to bleed more during tangential excision. Thus, burn<br />
surgery can be dangerous in high risk patients where blood<br />
transfusion facilities are not readily available.<br />
The options for the surgical management of burns includes early<br />
tangential excision and grafting for deep dermal burns and<br />
delayed escharectomy skin grafting for full thickness skin loss 47 .<br />
Tangential excision describes the sequential and layered excisions<br />
of devitalized tissues to a vital bed, generally recognized by<br />
punctuate bleeding. An inadequately excised wound is more likely<br />
to become infected and is unsuitable for graft take, necessitating<br />
further surgery. 19 The use of tumescence (discussed below) is<br />
good for decreasing blood loss from the burn site; however it<br />
makes judgment of adequacy of excision and of hemostasis more<br />
difficult. It can decrease blood loss to a minimal amount. Adequate<br />
debridement must instead be determined by tissue quality, and<br />
not by punctuate bleeding.<br />
The exact timing for wound excision is debatable. It is often<br />
suggested that burn wounds should be excised and grafted if they<br />
are not expected to heal within 21 days of injury. This is especially<br />
true for key functional and esthetic locations such as the hands<br />
and face. 19 The decision to perform extensive excisions in a single<br />
setting versus staged procedures is dependent upon the<br />
hemodynamic stability of the patient, the availability of resources,<br />
and the coordination of all parties involved in the care of the<br />
patient. 19 Conservative treatment of burn wounds, with silver<br />
sulfadiazine, followed by serial excision of the burn wound is<br />
currently the standard of care in many burn centres throughout the<br />
world. Burns are excised in areas of as much as 20% TBSA in one<br />
operative setting, and performing the entire excision of the burn<br />
wound in 10 days post-injury is the goal. All full-thickness burns<br />
can be excised first, so that deep dermal and indeterminate depth<br />
wounds are addressed later, preventing excision of potentially<br />
viable tissue. Early excision and grafting is the treatment of choice<br />
to potentially reduce scar contractures and hypopigmentation 47 .<br />
The disadvantages to serial excision are that the patient needs to<br />
return many times to the operative room, so that episodes of<br />
bacterial translocation, bacteremia, and cardiovascular instability<br />
are repeated. Other disadvantages include exaggerated blood<br />
losses, prolongation of the hypermetabolic response, and<br />
increased risk of infection and sepsis from remaining eschar in<br />
which bacteria proliferate.<br />
Near-total wound excision has been advocated as an alternative<br />
to serial debridement in massive burns. In near-total excision, all<br />
full-thickness and partial-thickness burns are excised within 24<br />
hours of admission, and the excised wounds are covered with<br />
autografts and skin substitutes are used if the burn exceeds the<br />
donor-site supply. Areas of the face are normally not excised in the<br />
first operation. Near-total burn excision has dramatically improved<br />
survival in massive burns 18 . However, it has been postulated that<br />
the surgical trauma of immediate burn wound excision, especially<br />
given the hemodynamic instability of burn patients during the first<br />
72 h after the injury, may aggravate the inflammatory and catabolic<br />
responses, leading to potentially fatal postoperative<br />
complications. 18,47 It should be clear that near-total wound excision<br />
is only meant for massive burns, and allograft/autograft/xenograft<br />
must be available for coverage, or the wounds would only have<br />
been converted to full thickness open wounds.<br />
General surgical principles<br />
The intent of burn wound operations is twofold: to remove<br />
devitalized tissue and restore skin continuity. For this process to<br />
take place and for the skin graft to take, four things are required:<br />
✚ A viable wound bed.<br />
✚ No accumulation of fluid between the graft and the wound<br />
bed.<br />
✚ No shear stresses on the wound.<br />
✚ Avoidance of massive micro-organism proliferation.<br />
Surgical debridement is performed using a Goulian blade for small<br />
areas or those with multiple irregular contours (e.g., hand or knee)<br />
and a Watson or Humby blade for larger areas. Inexpensive<br />
alternatives have been proposed for harvesting and debriding<br />
blades 48 . Burned tissue is excised tangentially and sequentially<br />
until the wound has been excised down to healthy dermis, fat,<br />
muscle, peritenon, or periosteum. The wound may then be<br />
covered with an autograft, allograft, or synthetic skin substitute.<br />
Graft depth should be adjusted in pediatric and geriatric<br />
populations for their thinner reticular dermis layer. If using a<br />
powered dermatome, it should be set at less than 10/1000th<br />
inch. The meshing pattern used for wound closure depends on<br />
burn surface area and donor site availability. Meshing of the skin<br />
graft has several advantages, including expanding the square<br />
centimeters of coverage, allowing for drainage of fluid from under<br />
the graft, and allowing for placement of the graft over contoured<br />
areas, such as the knee or ankle. The disadvantage of the meshed<br />
skin graft includes a permanent weave-like appearance of the<br />
healed scar site, and increased contraction. 17<br />
Many authors have described innovative methods for<br />
performing skin grafting in resource-poor settings 49 . With minimal<br />
financial resources, using readily available modified household or<br />
industrial materials a surgeon is able to sharpen the Humby knife<br />
48, 50<br />
and use a pizza cutter for meshing grafts.<br />
Methods of optimizing hemostasis and minimizing blood losses<br />
include meticulous attention to maintaining the patient’s core body<br />
temperature (operating in a warm environment, isolating surgical<br />
fields, warming intravenous fluids, warming humidified air circuits<br />
for anesthesia), the use of cautery, the application of topical<br />
epinephrine solutions or topical thrombin solutions, injecting dilute<br />
epinephrine tumescent solution below the eschar, and the use of<br />
topical fibrin sealants.<br />
The use of tumescence and tourniquet in burn excision<br />
significantly reduces intraoperative blood loss and facilitates<br />
accurate wound excision. Epinephrine is diluted in saline to a<br />
concentration of 1:500,000 (2mg/l) and large volumes are injected<br />
beneath the wound to be excised. Use a concentration of<br />
1:1,000,000 for children. The edges of the wound are scored with<br />
<strong>Hospital</strong> and Healthcare Innovation Book 2009/2010 61