Download - IndexUniverse.com
Download - IndexUniverse.com
Download - IndexUniverse.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The events of 2008 and early 2009 shattered investor confidence<br />
in how the markets work. Much of what we knew to be “true” was<br />
revealed as faulty thinking. Assets we thought were uncorrelated<br />
began trading in lock step; 1-in-100,000 events became <strong>com</strong>monplace;<br />
the unthinkable became frighteningly real.<br />
As we turn toward 2010, the Journal of Indexes editorial staff<br />
gathered six exemplary thinkers to ask whether, as many claim,<br />
buy-and-hold investing is “dead,” and how the events of the past<br />
year should shape how investors approach the future.<br />
John Bogle, Founder, Vanguard<br />
Journal of Indexes (JOI): Is buy-and-hold investing<br />
dead?<br />
John Bogle (Bogle): I would just say very<br />
simply, of all the stupid ideas, the idea that<br />
buy-and-hold investing is dead is [the most]<br />
ridiculous. I would just ask “Buy and hold what?”<br />
Buying and holding an individual stock has been dead<br />
forever, and buying and holding a managed portfolio is probably<br />
dying. And buying and holding the entire stock market<br />
is the way to invest in success. Then the question be<strong>com</strong>es,<br />
“Buy and hold what kind of portfolio?” I would say buy the<br />
bond market portfolio and the stock market portfolio and<br />
hold them both as long as you live, with one caveat. And that<br />
is, take into account your risk tolerance and your age. So<br />
adjust that equation—more in bonds when you’re older and<br />
more in stocks when you’re young. That idea will never die.<br />
Even worse, when someone says buy-and-hold is dead, they<br />
have lost sight of one simple elemental fact: As a group, we<br />
are all buy-and-hold investors—we buy and hold the market<br />
portfolio, all of us, together. As a group, we are definitely,<br />
irrevocably, unarguably buy-and-holders; individually we are<br />
not. So we trade with one another, and who is enriched<br />
by that? Clearly the people trading aren’t enriched by that,<br />
because one loses and one wins. The only enrichment is to our<br />
financial system —the croupiers of America—Wall Street and<br />
mutual fund managers. To fail to observe the simple fact that<br />
we all own the buy-and-hold portfolio, but we try and trade<br />
against it, is consigning ourselves to a shortfall, of some substantial<br />
portion, to whatever returns the markets are generous<br />
enough to give to us or mean enough to take away from us.<br />
JOI: Should investors be concerned about inflation during the<br />
near term? If so, how can they protect themselves against it?<br />
Bogle: There is one guarantee of inflation protection—the only<br />
and closest thing we have to a guarantee against inflation—the<br />
Treasury inflation indexed bond. Right now it has a very small<br />
yield because the market is looking for about 2.5 percent inflation.<br />
If it turns out to be higher than that, the government will<br />
pay you more money to protect you against it. If it’s lower than<br />
that, you’ve made a bad bet. It’s the only form of true inflation<br />
protection on a very short-term basis that I know of.<br />
Now you have to worry about whether that market projection<br />
of inflation is right, and I think one could say [there is]<br />
a high probability that inflation will <strong>com</strong>e back to 2 percent<br />
or 2.5 percent over the next couple years, but could easily in<br />
the years beyond that get to 3 or 4 or 5 percent. So while a<br />
1 percent yield looks very shabby at the moment—and it will<br />
be shabby this year—you’ve got to be willing to accept that.<br />
Like everything else in investment, if you want to eliminate<br />
a risk, you’ve got to give up some return. That’s the way the<br />
inflation-hedged bond works.<br />
JOI: Have you adjusted your investment philosophy during the<br />
last two years?<br />
Bogle: No. I have a very, very conservative investment philosophy.<br />
I’m in about 70-75 percent bonds—in my retirement<br />
bond account, largely taxable bond index funds; and in my<br />
personal account, largely limited-term to intermediate-term<br />
municipal bonds. I was very well protected when the market<br />
went down, and obviously I’ve had a much smaller share of<br />
the gains this year, because I’m only about 20-25 percent in<br />
our stock funds, largely index funds. But on balance for the<br />
two years, I’m still well ahead of the game.<br />
Because we’ve had a stock market that went down 57<br />
percent and then went up 57 percent, any investor who<br />
thinks that means they’re even at the end of the period is<br />
really naive. In fact, they’ve lost 32 percent of their capital.<br />
With a big plunge and a big recovery, you should never lose<br />
sight of the mathematics of the marketplace, and that is it<br />
takes essentially a 100 percent market increase to offset a 50<br />
percent market decline. We call that, after Justice Brandeis’<br />
formulation, the “relentless rules of humble arithmetic.” So<br />
I’m perfectly <strong>com</strong>fortable where I am—I missed some of the<br />
rise, but avoided potentially all of the fall.<br />
I don’t know how to do market timing, by the way. I’m<br />
not smart enough to do that. I’m <strong>com</strong>fortable enough not<br />
trying to outguess the market—not trading saves me a lot of<br />
money. I’m also not subject to taxes on those trades, which<br />
saves me a lot of money, and so on.<br />
JOI: What’s the biggest danger/opportunity that you see ahead<br />
for investors during the next five years?<br />
Bogle: I would say the greatest danger is that this financial<br />
recovery is going to be aborted. I worry about the economy<br />
and the global system. I would caution investors to be conservative,<br />
though maybe not as conservative as I am because<br />
I’m older and I’ve accumulated a certain amount of assets.<br />
I must confess to being amazed that as each piece of bad<br />
news <strong>com</strong>es in, the market goes up. That can’t go on forever.<br />
In any event, there is plenty to be concerned about, as I say<br />
in my new book, a fully updated 10th anniversary edition of<br />
“Common Sense on Mutual Funds.” I’ve updated all the data<br />
from 10 years ago, and my, how different it looks. But we<br />
have to deal—as Donald Rumsfeld put it, though it might<br />
not have been original with him—“not only with the known<br />
unknowns, but the unknown unknowns,” and there are plenty<br />
of them out there too. We have an uncertain world; [we<br />
have] great global <strong>com</strong>petition; we’re a high-priced country;<br />
we don’t make anything very much anymore; and we have a<br />
financial system that’s run amok and shows very, very few<br />
signs of straightening itself out.<br />
To capture what’s in my most recent article in the Journal<br />
of Portfolio Management, we need to develop [a solution to]<br />
this failed agency society we have—because most stocks are<br />
www.journalofindexes.<strong>com</strong><br />
January/February 2010<br />
35