28.01.2014 Views

Download - IndexUniverse.com

Download - IndexUniverse.com

Download - IndexUniverse.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 1<br />

Annual Tracking Error In Two Down Years And Two Up Years<br />

Down Years<br />

Up Years<br />

S&P 500 Annual Performance<br />

Fund Type<br />

Symbol<br />

2002<br />

-21.98<br />

2008<br />

-36.55<br />

1 Formerly Vanguard Total Market VIPERS. 2 Formerly Nasdaq-100 Index Tracking Stock. 3 Formerly Vanguard Extended Market VIPERS. 4 Formerly iShares Goldman Sachs<br />

Technology Index Fund. 5 Formerly iShares DJ US Consumer Cyclical. All calculations are Fund Return minus Index Return, so the tracking error includes the expense ratio.<br />

Sources: Morgan Stanley, Barclays Global Investors, State Street Global Investors, Thomson, Bloomberg<br />

2003<br />

28.25<br />

S&P Depositary Receipts (SPDR) SPY 1 12 -30 -14<br />

iShares Russell 1000 IWB -7 3 -25 -17<br />

Vanguard Total Market 1 VTI -10 7 -21 -5<br />

iShares Russell 3000 IWV -9 1 -29 -20<br />

iShares DJ US Total Market IYY -9 -10 -33 -25<br />

PowerShares QQQ 2 QQQQ -12 -10 -34 -26<br />

Diamonds Trust DIA -11 -1 -30 -23<br />

S&P MidCap 400 SPDR MDY -5 -43 -46 -30<br />

iShares S&P MidCap 400 IJH -21 3 -25 -18<br />

iShares S&P MidCap 400 Growth IJK -24 -1 -19 -6<br />

iShares Russell MidCap IWR 2 4 -33 -22<br />

iShares Russell 2000 IWM -4 13 -31 -19<br />

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth IJT -19 6 -26 -24<br />

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 IJR -11 -2 -20 -18<br />

Vanguard Extended Market ETF 3 VXF -24 34 -29 18<br />

iShares S&P 500 Growth IVW -9 -3 -24 -20<br />

iShares Russell 1000 Growth IWF -11 -3 -29 -20<br />

iShares Russell 2000 Growth IWO -3 11 -35 -22<br />

iShares S&P 500 Value IVE -13 -2 -28 -21<br />

iShares Russell 1000 Value IWD -16 2 -32 -24<br />

iShares Russell 2000 Value IWN -9 18 -41 -29<br />

Technology Sector SPDR XLK -15 40 -46 -22<br />

iShares S&P North American Techology 4 IGM -31 -18 -61 -53<br />

Financial Sector SPDR XLF -19 6 -53 -39<br />

iShares DJ US Financial Sector IYF -46 -6 -86 -62<br />

Consumer Discretionary Sector SPDR XLY -21 6 -44 -19<br />

iShares DJ US Consumer Goods 5 IYK -58 -21 -73 -59<br />

Energy Sector SPDR XLE -19 -9 -49 -28<br />

Industrial Sector SPDR XLI -22 1 -59 -30<br />

Column Totals -455 38 -1091 -697<br />

Average per fund (rounded) -15 1 -36 -23<br />

2006<br />

15.49<br />

same entity. With respect to 40 percent of its investments,<br />

the UCITS can invest no more than 5 percent of its assets<br />

in the instruments of a single issuer. Interestingly, there is<br />

a more flexible UCITS provision for index funds. An indexreplicating<br />

UCITS fund may invest up to 20 percent of its net<br />

assets in shares and/or debt securities issued by the same<br />

entity. The 20 percent limit can be raised to 35 percent under<br />

“exceptional market conditions.” To qualify for these larger<br />

positions, the benchmark index must use a recognized methodology<br />

that generally does not result in the exclusion of a<br />

major issuer in the market the index represents.<br />

Benchmark replication inside an ETF does not appear<br />

to be a significant diversification issue in the EU countries<br />

where UCITS prevails or elsewhere outside the U.S. However,<br />

a number of U.S. ETFs are based on non-RIC-<strong>com</strong>pliant indexes.<br />

A few single-country ETFs and some sector funds issued<br />

by Barclays Global Investors based on Dow Jones sector<br />

indexes and by Vanguard based on MSCI sector indexes are<br />

not based on RIC-<strong>com</strong>pliant indexes. The S&P sector indexes<br />

used for the Select Sector SPDRs are specially weighted to be<br />

RIC <strong>com</strong>pliant. Most indexes introduced as ETF benchmarks<br />

have been RIC and/or UCITS <strong>com</strong>pliant. 2 All or nearly all index<br />

publishers are willing to provide RIC- and UCITS-<strong>com</strong>pliant<br />

versions of any of their indexes. The use of non<strong>com</strong>pliant<br />

48<br />

January/February 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!