Download - IndexUniverse.com
Download - IndexUniverse.com
Download - IndexUniverse.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Editor’s Note<br />
Was 2008 A Last Gasp?<br />
Or A Rebirth?<br />
Jim Wiandt<br />
Editor<br />
Sound the bells, weep a thousand tears! Buy-and-hold investing is dead. Here we<br />
are again, my friends, at another six sigma special, a new paradigm, the never ever<br />
before a hundred times again. Another Great Depression, ah the drama!<br />
Ho hum.<br />
My question, and the question that we are really getting at in this issue is this: Is it<br />
really all that? I love our opening piece by the always provocative and well-sourced Matt<br />
Moran, because he sort of indicates that, well, yes, maybe it is. The BIG story that <strong>com</strong>es<br />
out of last fall is its double-underlined, highlighted restatement of the dirty little secret of<br />
modern portfolio theory: The very reason we seek out diversification—to seek shelter in<br />
times of economic turmoil—is the very time when the correlation benefit of diversification<br />
tends to fail.<br />
Or that’s what we heard a million times last fall, even as we watched equity prices,<br />
bond prices, heck, even gold prices plummet in tandem. The Moran piece takes a real<br />
good look at the data, and his conclusion is that yes, the magnitude of collapsing correlations<br />
last fall was exceptional.<br />
Next up is Rob Arnott, looking at, yes, market weighting with his co-authors. But<br />
they detail various permutations and <strong>com</strong>binations of cap, equal and economic—or<br />
“fundamental”—weighting and their history (and future?) in ways that I’m sure you’ll<br />
find interesting.<br />
In a surprise appearance, the former editor of this publication, John Prestbo, <strong>com</strong>es in<br />
with his own rather stunning assertion that buy-and-hold just may not be the all-ending<br />
gospel for a sensible, cautious, thoughtful investor. And this from a man who is indexing.<br />
Directly addressing our “Is Buy-And-Hold Dead?” theme, we’ve got an exceptional and<br />
insightful virtual roundtable including John Bogle, Diane Garnick, Jeremy Siegel, Burton<br />
Malkiel and others weighing in on the subject.<br />
The always interesting, always thorough Professor Craig Israelsen submits that it is not<br />
so much if a fund is active or passive that matters, but how that portfolio of funds is managed<br />
by the end-investor, a topic that seems particularly apt as more and more investors<br />
use passive products in very active ways, even as some active investors use their funds in<br />
very passive ways. And of course, the professor has got data. Lots of data.<br />
Next, Gary Gastineau presents part two of his series on mutual funds and ETFs and<br />
focuses on how fund ratings systems should really work.<br />
Bringing us home this issue is David Blitzer, who came up with a column spoofing the<br />
famous New York Sun letter from “Virginia” asking if Santa Claus was real. Only, Blitzer’s<br />
writer “Bill” asks instead if buy-and-hold is dead, or lives with us still.<br />
We’re getting back to the basics this issue, like a broad swath of the investing public,<br />
and we hope you enjoy it.<br />
See you in Florida at our Inside ETFs conference!<br />
Jim Wiandt<br />
Editor<br />
8<br />
January/February 2010