28.01.2014 Views

Download - IndexUniverse.com

Download - IndexUniverse.com

Download - IndexUniverse.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Editor’s Note<br />

Was 2008 A Last Gasp?<br />

Or A Rebirth?<br />

Jim Wiandt<br />

Editor<br />

Sound the bells, weep a thousand tears! Buy-and-hold investing is dead. Here we<br />

are again, my friends, at another six sigma special, a new paradigm, the never ever<br />

before a hundred times again. Another Great Depression, ah the drama!<br />

Ho hum.<br />

My question, and the question that we are really getting at in this issue is this: Is it<br />

really all that? I love our opening piece by the always provocative and well-sourced Matt<br />

Moran, because he sort of indicates that, well, yes, maybe it is. The BIG story that <strong>com</strong>es<br />

out of last fall is its double-underlined, highlighted restatement of the dirty little secret of<br />

modern portfolio theory: The very reason we seek out diversification—to seek shelter in<br />

times of economic turmoil—is the very time when the correlation benefit of diversification<br />

tends to fail.<br />

Or that’s what we heard a million times last fall, even as we watched equity prices,<br />

bond prices, heck, even gold prices plummet in tandem. The Moran piece takes a real<br />

good look at the data, and his conclusion is that yes, the magnitude of collapsing correlations<br />

last fall was exceptional.<br />

Next up is Rob Arnott, looking at, yes, market weighting with his co-authors. But<br />

they detail various permutations and <strong>com</strong>binations of cap, equal and economic—or<br />

“fundamental”—weighting and their history (and future?) in ways that I’m sure you’ll<br />

find interesting.<br />

In a surprise appearance, the former editor of this publication, John Prestbo, <strong>com</strong>es in<br />

with his own rather stunning assertion that buy-and-hold just may not be the all-ending<br />

gospel for a sensible, cautious, thoughtful investor. And this from a man who is indexing.<br />

Directly addressing our “Is Buy-And-Hold Dead?” theme, we’ve got an exceptional and<br />

insightful virtual roundtable including John Bogle, Diane Garnick, Jeremy Siegel, Burton<br />

Malkiel and others weighing in on the subject.<br />

The always interesting, always thorough Professor Craig Israelsen submits that it is not<br />

so much if a fund is active or passive that matters, but how that portfolio of funds is managed<br />

by the end-investor, a topic that seems particularly apt as more and more investors<br />

use passive products in very active ways, even as some active investors use their funds in<br />

very passive ways. And of course, the professor has got data. Lots of data.<br />

Next, Gary Gastineau presents part two of his series on mutual funds and ETFs and<br />

focuses on how fund ratings systems should really work.<br />

Bringing us home this issue is David Blitzer, who came up with a column spoofing the<br />

famous New York Sun letter from “Virginia” asking if Santa Claus was real. Only, Blitzer’s<br />

writer “Bill” asks instead if buy-and-hold is dead, or lives with us still.<br />

We’re getting back to the basics this issue, like a broad swath of the investing public,<br />

and we hope you enjoy it.<br />

See you in Florida at our Inside ETFs conference!<br />

Jim Wiandt<br />

Editor<br />

8<br />

January/February 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!