05.02.2014 Views

Unauthorized - Parent Directory - Support

Unauthorized - Parent Directory - Support

Unauthorized - Parent Directory - Support

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FIRST LOOKS<br />

HARDWARE<br />

Lexmark E120n<br />

With its small footprint,<br />

fast performance, and<br />

network connectivity,<br />

the Lexmark E120n is a<br />

good choice for sharing<br />

on a home or smalloffice<br />

network.<br />

$149 direct<br />

go.pcmag.com/<br />

lexmarke120n<br />

lllhm<br />

NETWORK POWER ON<br />

A PERSONAL PRINTER<br />

WITH A BARGAIN PRICE, SMALL<br />

size, and paper capacity suitable<br />

only for light-duty printing,<br />

the Lexmark E120n is<br />

decidedly a personal laser printer.<br />

This one, however, has networking<br />

capabilities, which makes it a good choice for a<br />

home office or very small office. It’s still a monochrome<br />

printer, though, so if you plan on printing a lot of color<br />

graphics or photos, an ink jet is a better solution.<br />

Setup is as simple as it gets. The E120n’s speed and<br />

text quality is, according to our tests, more than good<br />

enough for any text you’re likely to print. Graphics qual-<br />

ity is just okay, which is typical for most monochrome<br />

lasers. For internal documents it’s fine, but I wouldn’t<br />

use it if I were trying to impress a potential client.<br />

The only real drawback is the low paper capacity.<br />

If you print as few as 50 pages a day, you’ll be refilling<br />

the tray roughly every third day, which can be quite<br />

annoying. But if that’s not a concern, the E120n offers<br />

a better balance of speed and quality than its direct<br />

competition, and it’s a network printer at a stunningly<br />

low price.—M. David Stone<br />

5.2 inches<br />

THIS DREAMY DEVICE<br />

DOESN’T WORK<br />

THE IOMEGA SCREENPLAY SEEMS<br />

like a dream come true: a 60GB hard<br />

drive that plays video, photos, and music<br />

on a TV. Sadly, the ScreenPlay has<br />

limited playback capabilities, is pricey,<br />

and simply doesn’t work.<br />

The ScreenPlay claims to support most flavors<br />

of MPEG video, but on our tests, I had trouble playing<br />

unprotected MPEG-4 files. QuickTime, Real,<br />

and WMV aren’t supported, either. Photo and music<br />

playback is better, although still not top-notch. The<br />

ScreenPlay doesn’t support some common audio formats<br />

like M4P/M4A and WMA. And if you do have<br />

music that’s supported, good luck finding it. The navigation<br />

is awkward: You must play or scroll through all<br />

your music just to find the song you want.<br />

And yet, that’s not the worst part: The ScreenPlay is<br />

slooooooooow. Unbearably slow. It took me 14 minutes<br />

Iomega ScreenPlay<br />

to boot up to a navigational screen on my TV, and then<br />

Great in concept but a<br />

failure in execution, the<br />

once I got there, clicking on any of the icons resulted in<br />

Iomega ScreenPlay has<br />

a 5-minute—or longer—wait.<br />

more things wrong than<br />

The Iomega ScreenPlay needs work—lots of work.<br />

right. Don’t buy this<br />

First, the performance needs to be fixed so that you<br />

product.<br />

$220 direct<br />

can actually browse and view content. Adding playlist<br />

go.pcmag.com/<br />

support, better file navigation, and search capabilities<br />

iomegascreenplay<br />

should also top that “needs fixing” list.<br />

lmmmm<br />

—Joel Santo Domingo<br />

YYePG Proudly Presents, Thx for <strong>Support</strong><br />

28 PC MAGAZINE MAY 9, 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!