27.02.2014 Views

INAUGURAL–DISSERTATION zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der ...

INAUGURAL–DISSERTATION zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der ...

INAUGURAL–DISSERTATION zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

36 2. Mathematical Modeling<br />

and ρ l is the liquid density.<br />

ṁ i is zero for non-evaporating solute (PVP or mannitol),<br />

i = 2. The diffusion process described through Eq. (2.51) provides the mass fraction<br />

profiles inside the droplet. In or<strong>der</strong> to close this equation, the evaporation rate from the<br />

droplet surface, ṁ i is needed, which appears in Eq. (2.52). This rate of evaporation is<br />

determined based on Sherwood analogy of Abramzon and Sirignano’s model [62], and<br />

in the present study, it is used in the extended form for a bi-component liquid mixture<br />

as modified by Brenn et al. [170],<br />

ṁ i = 2πR i ρ f D f ˜Sh ln(1 + BM,i ), (2.53)<br />

where R i is volume equivalent partial radius of component i, based on its corresponding<br />

volume fraction, computed as R i = R(V i /V ) 1/3 , ˜Sh is the modified Sherwood number<br />

defined by Eq. (2.42), which accounts for the effect of convective droplet evaporation<br />

[62], D f is water vapor diffusivity in film, and ρ f is the density in the film. B M,i is<br />

the Spalding mass transfer number for component i, and it is calculated as [62, 171],<br />

B M,i = Y i,s − Y i,∞<br />

1 − Y i,s<br />

, (2.54)<br />

where Y i,s and Y i,∞ are the mass fractions of evaporating component i at the droplet<br />

surface and in the bulk of the gas, respectively. Nesic and Vodnik [151] implemented<br />

a similar approach, but they do not account for the volume fraction based radius in<br />

the calculation of the evaporation rate, i.e., droplet radius R is used instead of R i<br />

in computing ṁ i . The evaporation rate retardation due to solid layer resistance may<br />

be consi<strong>der</strong>ed through modification of Eq. (2.53) by extending the work of Nesic and<br />

Vodnik [151] to yield<br />

ṁ =<br />

∑ N<br />

i=1 2πR iρ f D f ˜Sh ln(1 + BM,i )<br />

1 + ˜ShD<br />

, (2.55)<br />

f δ/[2D s (R − δ)]<br />

where ṁ is the total evaporation rate, δ is the solid layer thickness at the droplet surface<br />

and D s is the diffusivity of vapor in the solid layer. Since the solute vapor pressure is<br />

low or zero and the droplet’s solute evaporation rate is zero or very small, negligence<br />

of the volume correction (using R in the place of R i ) may lead to an artificial increase<br />

in evaporation rate. In the present situation, the summation in Eq. (2.55) is only over<br />

component 1, because the solute (PVP or mannitol) does not evaporate, but for the<br />

sake of generality, the summation is kept.<br />

During the initial and second stage, δ equals zero. But once the solute mass fraction<br />

at the droplet surface reaches a threshold value, which is most often near saturation<br />

solubility level, there is initiation of solid layer. This solid layer on the droplet surface<br />

offers significant resistance to evaporation and is evident from the second term in the<br />

denominator of Eq. (2.55) [172]. The effect of capillary force on water vapor diffusion

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!