27.02.2014 Views

INAUGURAL–DISSERTATION zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der ...

INAUGURAL–DISSERTATION zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der ...

INAUGURAL–DISSERTATION zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.1. One-dimensional Evaporating Water Spray in Nitrogen 63<br />

The variations in Sauter mean diameter with axial position of the spray for two different<br />

liquid inflow rates of 80 kg/h and 150 kg/h are shown in Fig. 4.9. The results for<br />

80 kg/h show an increasing Sauter mean diameter with evaporation. Inclusion of coalescence<br />

in addition to evaporation leads to excellent agreement between computational<br />

and experimental results. On the contrary, the computational results for 150 kg/h at<br />

x = 0.54 m seem to be deviating far away from the experimental data. The observed<br />

deviation is due to inconsistency in experimental data, which is evident from the fact<br />

that the experimental flow rate does not match the prescribed value of 150 kg/h at<br />

0.54 m. Therefore, the results from 80 kg/h will be discussed for the remaining part of<br />

this section.<br />

Figure 4.10 displays the profiles of the Sauter mean diameter (left) and mean droplet<br />

diameter (right) of water spray subjected to evaporation at 293 K and 313 K temperatures<br />

of surrounding gas as well as with and without coalescence. As expected, Sauter<br />

mean diameter increases substantially with evaporation that causes the decrease and<br />

eventual loss of small size droplets. Higher temperature imposes a rise in evaporation,<br />

which consi<strong>der</strong>ably accelerates the rate of increase of Sauter mean diameter. A comparison<br />

with experimental data reveals the importance of modeling the droplet coalescence,<br />

which not only improves the simulation results but also has excellent agreement with<br />

experiment (see left side of Fig. 4.10).<br />

Similar to Sauter mean diameter, the mean droplet diameter is an important physical<br />

quantity for several applications such as particle size analysis of pow<strong>der</strong> sampling<br />

in food and pharmaceutical industries [201]. Mean droplet diameter of a number density<br />

based distribution can be computed using the Eq. (2.18). Since very small size<br />

160<br />

150<br />

Experiment - 293 K<br />

Evaporation - 293 K<br />

Evaporation and Coalescence - 293 K<br />

Evaporation - 313 K<br />

Evaporation and Coalescence - 313 K<br />

90<br />

85<br />

Experiment - 293 K<br />

Evaporation - 293 K<br />

Evaporation and Coalescence - 293 K<br />

Evaporation - 313 K<br />

Evaporation and Coalescence - 313 K<br />

Sauter mean diameter [µm]<br />

140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

D 10<br />

[µm]<br />

80<br />

75<br />

70<br />

65<br />

60<br />

55<br />

100<br />

0.14 0.28 0.42 0.56 0.7 0.84<br />

Position [m]<br />

50<br />

0.14 0.28 0.42 0.56 0.7 0.84<br />

Position [m]<br />

Fig. 4.10: Profiles of Sauter mean diameter (left) and mean droplet diameter (right)<br />

computed with and without coalescence at surrounding gas temperatures of<br />

293 K and 313 K.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!