27.02.2014 Views

INAUGURAL–DISSERTATION zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der ...

INAUGURAL–DISSERTATION zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der ...

INAUGURAL–DISSERTATION zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.4. Single Droplet Modeling 43<br />

not to the spray itself as the extension of these models to dense spray flows is much<br />

more complex [184], because of individual droplet tracking requirement. Implementation<br />

of droplet coalescence models needs tracking of individual droplets as done in<br />

Euler – Lagrangian simulations. In case of Euler – Euler models, droplet distribution<br />

is computed but the individual droplets are not tracked. Hylkema and Villedieu [187]<br />

developed a droplet collision model based on the droplet distribution, which can be<br />

implemented in Euler–Euler methods. In the current study, as the spray flow is modeled<br />

using Eulerian approach where the global droplet distribution is computed, so the<br />

droplet collisions are taken into account as described by Hylkema and Villedieu [187]<br />

and Laurent [46]. To emphasize upon coalescence only, standard assumptions [46] for<br />

droplet coalescence have been employed. These assumptions imply that each binary<br />

collision either leads to coalescence (E c = 1) or rebound (E c = 0), and conservation<br />

of mass and momentum before and after the collision [46] is assured. In addition, the<br />

mean collision time is assumed to be smaller than the inter-collision time. Thus, the<br />

coalescence function can be written in terms of the flux of newly formed droplet, Q + c<br />

and flux of the vanishing droplets, Q − c , given by [187]<br />

Γ f = Q + c + Q − c , (2.69)<br />

where Q + c and Q − c are calculated as<br />

Q − c<br />

∫ ∞<br />

= −<br />

−∞<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

f(t, x; r, v)f(t, x; r 1 , v 1 ) × B(|v − v 1 |)dr 1 dv 1 , (2.70)<br />

Q + c =<br />

∫ ∞ ∫ ∞<br />

−∞<br />

where B(|v 1 − v 2 |) is given by,<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2 f(t, x; r 1, v 1 )f(t, x; r 2 , v 2 ) × B(|v 1 − v 2 |)dr 1 dv 1 , (2.71)<br />

B(|v 1 − v 2 |) = π(r 1 + r 2 ) 2 |v 2 − v 1 |E c , (2.72)<br />

and B(|v − v 1 |) is defined accordingly. In the above equations, (r, v) refer to postcollision<br />

properties, which are related to pre-collision properties (r 1 , v 1 ) and (r 2 , v 2 )<br />

through the relations [46, 187]<br />

v = r3 1v 1 + r2v 3 2<br />

, (2.73)<br />

r1 3 + r2<br />

3<br />

r 3 = r1 3 + r2. 3 (2.74)<br />

The collision efficiency is computed following the work of O’Rourke [186], which is<br />

written as<br />

E c =<br />

K 2<br />

(K + 1/2) 2 , (2.75)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!