27.02.2014 Views

INAUGURAL–DISSERTATION zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der ...

INAUGURAL–DISSERTATION zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der ...

INAUGURAL–DISSERTATION zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

76 4. Results and Discussion<br />

experimental data are somewhat spread at 0.12 m from the nozzle exit. At 0.16 m, the<br />

slopes of the numerical results deviate from the experimental data, particularly in large<br />

size droplets region where the effective cross sectional area shows strong fluctuations<br />

in experiment as shown in Fig. 4.14. This implies that the post-processing of experimental<br />

data plays an important role in the corrections of number density and thereby<br />

the droplet properties [207]. Comparing the velocity profiles at the two different cross<br />

sections, it is seen that the velocity decreases as droplets move away from the nozzle.<br />

This is because the droplets are strongly decelerated by the dynamic interaction with<br />

the surrounding gas. The gas around the spray stagnates and is driven into motion<br />

only due to the spray entrainment. The gas motion driven by the spray arises at the<br />

expense that the droplet loses momentum.<br />

The droplet properties are predicted quite well by the present simulations, which<br />

confirms their applicability for spray flows. There are some deviations between simulation<br />

and experimental results, which are attributable to the post-processing of the<br />

experimental data as mentioned before. In case of DDM, neglecting droplet–droplet<br />

interactions may need reconsi<strong>der</strong>ation. For DQMOM, the improved numerical scheme<br />

and the simultaneous solution of the gas phase equations may improve the simulation<br />

results.<br />

Based on these simulation results and comparison with the experiment, it can be<br />

concluded that the DQMOM is a robust method, which can predict the spray flows<br />

accurately. This led to the implementation of DQMOM to study bi-component evaporating<br />

spray, i.e., PVP/water spray flow in two dimensions. In or<strong>der</strong> to perform<br />

simulations of PVP/water spray flows, the predictability and efficiency of developed bicomponent<br />

droplet evaporation and solid layer formation model (see Subsection 2.4.1.2)<br />

needs to be verified un<strong>der</strong> different drying conditions. The next section presents the<br />

numerical simulation of single bi-component droplet evaporation and solid layer development,<br />

and comparison of simulation results with experiment.<br />

4.3 Single Bi-component Droplet Evaporation and<br />

Solid Layer Formation<br />

The model presented in Subsection 2.4.1.2 to predict the evaporation and solid layer<br />

formation for PVP/water droplet and mannitol/water droplet is simulated with different<br />

conditions such as initial solute mass fraction, gas temperature and velocity,<br />

relative humidity, initial droplet size etc. In the next subsections, the vapor-liquid<br />

equilibrium calculation followed by non-ideality effect caused by the solute (PVP or<br />

mannitol) presence on the droplet heating and evaporation rate is explained. Finally,<br />

the single droplet evaporation and solid layer development results are presented.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!