28.02.2014 Views

As and Epitaxial-Growth MnSi Thin Films - OPUS Würzburg

As and Epitaxial-Growth MnSi Thin Films - OPUS Würzburg

As and Epitaxial-Growth MnSi Thin Films - OPUS Würzburg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.1. Magnetotransport Measurements in <strong>MnSi</strong> epitaxial thin films 107<br />

% Magnetoresistance<br />

17.9 nm with c-Si cap<br />

0.8<br />

J || B(90 o )<br />

B(0 o __<br />

) || <strong>MnSi</strong>[211]<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3<br />

Magnetic Field (T)<br />

% Magnetoresistance<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

-0.1<br />

-0.2<br />

17.1 nm with c-Si cap<br />

_<br />

J || B(-90 o ) || <strong>MnSi</strong>[211]<br />

B(0 o _<br />

) || <strong>MnSi</strong>[011]<br />

-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3<br />

Magnetic Field(T)<br />

Fig. 8.6: Longitudinal magnetoresistance measurements for 17.1 <strong>and</strong> 17.9nm-nm thick <strong>MnSi</strong><br />

home-grown films, presented here as points of comparison for the 20-nm measurement. The<br />

percent change in magnetoresistance is calculated from the zero-field resistance value <strong>and</strong> both<br />

samples show very low magnetoresistance which is positive at very low fields. The current for<br />

both films are along <strong>MnSi</strong>[¯211] (B(0 ◦ ) ‖<strong>MnSi</strong>[01¯1]).<br />

From the magnetoresistance polar plots of both layers, it is pretty difficult to conclude<br />

the strength of the uniaxial anisotropy with the lack of sharp magnetization switches for<br />

materials such as (Ga,Mn)<strong>As</strong>. We might attribute this to the demagnetization corrections<br />

from the shape anisotropy of the Hall bar.[Ahar 98] Indeed, sample shape has been<br />

studied <strong>and</strong> observed to reduce <strong>and</strong> shift the transition fields. [Baue 12]<br />

Also as a test for the possibility of in-plane transport contributions of an out-of-plane<br />

field, magnetic fields of 0 to 200 mT was applied along <strong>MnSi</strong>[111] while varying the<br />

in-plane magnetic field. The plots are shown in Figure 8.8. For helical magnets, an applied<br />

in-plane field distorts the helix into a helicoidal structure until the magnetization<br />

structure breaks into isolated domains at saturation.[Karh 12] For our measurements, we<br />

do not reach this critical value H D in our applied fields. For an out-of-plane field, the<br />

helical structure is pulled into a conical state until the applied field is high enough to<br />

reach an induced ferromagnetic state. From measurements done on <strong>MnSi</strong> thin films, the<br />

helical-conical transition magnetic field is estimated to be around 180 mT for fields applied<br />

along <strong>MnSi</strong>[111].[Karh 11] Below a certain field, the helical structure re-orients to<br />

the easy axis.[Plum 81]<br />

Comparing the polar plots for the 0 mT <strong>and</strong> 200mT applied fields, it seems that there is a<br />

change in the low-field fluctuations at an out-of-plane applied field near 200 mT. (Figure<br />

8.8) However, as with Figure 8.7, this difference could possibly just arise from the demagnetization<br />

effects. This is supported by the plots with other out-of-plane magnetic field<br />

strengths where the observed evolution of the magnetic properties appear to be r<strong>and</strong>om

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!