03.03.2014 Views

Overlooked and Undercounted - Insight Center for Community ...

Overlooked and Undercounted - Insight Center for Community ...

Overlooked and Undercounted - Insight Center for Community ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20 — OVERLOOKED AND UNDERCOUNTED<br />

work schedules or other characteristics that result in<br />

lower earnings. 22<br />

Because there are strong differences by gender <strong>and</strong><br />

race/ethnicity in rates of income adequacy, it might be<br />

expected that occupational segregation by gender <strong>and</strong><br />

race/ethnicity would explain a portion of differences<br />

in income adequacy. 23 That is, if gender or race-based<br />

occupational segregation was a factor in higher income<br />

inadequacy rates among these households, one would<br />

expect that women <strong>and</strong>/or non-White householders<br />

would be found in different occupations than their White<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or male counterparts. However, there is much more<br />

overlap than difference in occupational distribution by<br />

both gender <strong>and</strong> race/ethnicity.<br />

As seen in Table 10, male <strong>and</strong> female householders<br />

with incomes below the St<strong>and</strong>ard have six of their ten<br />

top occupations in common. That is, men <strong>and</strong> women<br />

householders with inadequate incomes are overall<br />

working in many of the same occupational fields, such as<br />

‘office <strong>and</strong> administrative support’ <strong>and</strong> ‘food preparation<br />

<strong>and</strong> serving’. However, female householders with incomes<br />

below the St<strong>and</strong>ard do not share a few occupations with<br />

male householders below the St<strong>and</strong>ard: 1) personal<br />

care <strong>and</strong> service, 2) education, training, <strong>and</strong> library, 3)<br />

healthcare support, <strong>and</strong> 4) healthcare practitioners <strong>and</strong><br />

technical. Likewise, the following occupational categories<br />

are only among the top ten <strong>for</strong> male householders<br />

below the St<strong>and</strong>ard: 1) construction <strong>and</strong> extraction, 2)<br />

installation, maintenance, <strong>and</strong> repair, 3) management,<br />

<strong>and</strong> 4) fishing, farming, <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>estry.<br />

As seen in Table 11, there are even more occupations<br />

in common between African-American <strong>and</strong> White<br />

householders. Eight of the top ten occupations of<br />

African-American <strong>and</strong> White householders with incomes<br />

below the St<strong>and</strong>ard are shared: 1) sales, 2) office <strong>and</strong><br />

administrative support, 3) production, 4) construction<br />

<strong>and</strong> extraction, 5) food preparation <strong>and</strong> serving, 6)<br />

transportation <strong>and</strong> material moving, 7) personal care<br />

<strong>and</strong> service, <strong>and</strong> 8) building <strong>and</strong> grounds cleaning <strong>and</strong><br />

maintenance. These occupations represent nearly twothirds<br />

of the occupations held by African-American<br />

<strong>and</strong> White householders with incomes below the<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard, indicating that African-American <strong>and</strong> White<br />

householders with inadequate incomes are working<br />

primarily in the same occupational fields.<br />

However, some occupations are not shared across<br />

race/ethnicity <strong>for</strong> households with incomes below the<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard:<br />

Table 11. Top Ten Occupations 1 of Householders 2 Below the Self-Sufficiency St<strong>and</strong>ard by<br />

Race <strong>and</strong> Ethnicity: Mississippi 2007<br />

HOUSEHOLDS BELOW SELF-SUFFICIENCY STANDARD<br />

WHITE HOUSEHOLDERS<br />

BLACK OR AFRICAN-AMERICAN HOUSEHOLDERS<br />

Rank Occupation Percent Cumulative<br />

Percent<br />

Rank Occupation Percent Cumulative<br />

Percent<br />

1 Sales 13.7% 13.7% 1 Production 12.8% 12.8%<br />

2 Office <strong>and</strong> Administrative Support 10.5% 24.2% 2 Food Preparation <strong>and</strong> Serving 10.4% 23.2%<br />

3 Production 8.8% 33.0% 3 Sales <strong>and</strong> Related 10.1% 33.3%<br />

4 Construction <strong>and</strong> Extraction 8.6% 41.6% 4 Office <strong>and</strong> Administrative Support 8.7% 42.0%<br />

5 Food Preparation <strong>and</strong> Serving 6.9% 48.5% 5<br />

Building <strong>and</strong> Grounds Cleaning <strong>and</strong><br />

Maintenance<br />

8.1% 50.2%<br />

6 Transportation <strong>and</strong> Material Moving 6.1% 54.6% 6 Transportation <strong>and</strong> Material Moving 6.8% 57.0%<br />

7 Personal Care <strong>and</strong> Service 4.4% 59.0% 7 Healthcare Support 5.0% 62.0%<br />

8<br />

Building <strong>and</strong> Grounds Cleaning <strong>and</strong><br />

Maintenance<br />

4.0% 62.9% 8 Personal Care <strong>and</strong> Service 4.9% 66.9%<br />

9 Installation, Maintenance, & Repair 3.8% 66.8% 9 Education, Training, <strong>and</strong> Library 4.4% 71.3%<br />

10 Management 3.8% 70.6% 10 Construction <strong>and</strong> Extraction 2.9% 74.2%<br />

1<br />

Occupation groupings are based on the St<strong>and</strong>ard Occupational Classification (SOC). For definitions of these major groups see the Bureau of Labor<br />

Statistics St<strong>and</strong>ard Occupation Classifications at http://www.bls.gov/soc/soc_majo.htm<br />

2<br />

The householder is the person (or one of the persons) in whose name the housing unit is owned or rented or, if there is no such person, the<br />

householder is any adult member, excluding roomers, boarders, or paid employees.<br />

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 American <strong>Community</strong> Survey.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!