15.03.2014 Views

Abstract book 6th RMS 16.indd

Abstract book 6th RMS 16.indd

Abstract book 6th RMS 16.indd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

439<br />

Insulin Vials vs. Insulin Cartridges:<br />

Further Cost Considerations<br />

Mohammad Ghassan Al-Sharayri Pharm*,<br />

Capt. pharm. Tareq M. Alsabrah Capt. pharm.<br />

Tariq M. Aljbori Capt. pharm. Ala’a eddeen K.<br />

Abu-Rumman Maj. pharm. Rabia J. Al Jabrah,<br />

* Pharmacist, Royal Medical Services (Jordan)<br />

alsharayri@yahoo.com<br />

Objectives: To highlight further cost<br />

considerations associated with the wastage<br />

in the use of insulin vials and cartridges in<br />

the Jordanian Royal Medical Services.<br />

Methods: Two random samples were<br />

selected from prescriptions dispensed for<br />

diabetic patients using insulin in January<br />

2012 from the outpatient pharmacy in<br />

Al-Hussein Hospital, King Hussein Medical<br />

Center, Amman, Jordan. First sample was<br />

selected from prescriptions of patients<br />

using vials; second sample was selected<br />

from prescriptions of patients using<br />

pens and cartridges. Average costs for<br />

insulin and wastage were calculated per<br />

patient from the Royal Medical Services<br />

perspective.<br />

Results: The average direct cost per<br />

patient using vials was JD 5.197 and for<br />

those using cartridges this was JD 22.135.<br />

The average wasted quantity per patient in<br />

the first sample was more than ten times<br />

that of the second sample. The cost of the<br />

average wasted quantity per patient in the<br />

first sample (1.022 JD) was more than the<br />

double that in the second sample (0.441<br />

JD).<br />

Conclusion: Although the direct cost of<br />

insulin per patient by using vials was lower<br />

than cartridges, there was a substantial<br />

reduction in the cost of wastage by using<br />

the cartridges in the Jordanian Royal<br />

Medical Services outpatients.<br />

440<br />

Effect of Smoking on Tacrolimus<br />

Trough Concentration and Renal<br />

Function in Jordanian Renal<br />

Transplant Recipients<br />

Muhammad Al-Ulemat MSc Clinical Pharmacist*,<br />

Ikbal Thuhirat MSc.Clin. Pharm., Hadeel<br />

El- Zayyat MSc.Clin. Pharm., Arwa Alhroot<br />

BSc. Pharm., Amin Alquda MD - Royal Medical<br />

Services/ King Hussein Medical Center,<br />

Amman, Jordan<br />

* Clinical Pharmacist Directorate of Pharmacy<br />

& Drugs, Royal Medical Services - Amman<br />

(Jordan)<br />

muhammadolemat@yahoo.com<br />

Objectives: To determine the impact<br />

of smoking on Tacrolimus trough<br />

concentration dose adjusted Tacrolimus<br />

trough concentration, Tacrolimus dose<br />

requirement, renal function and to evaluate<br />

the prevalence of smoking in Jordanian<br />

renal transplant recipients (RTRs).<br />

Methods: A cross-sectional observational<br />

study was carried out to assess the impact of<br />

smoking on renal function and Tacrolimus<br />

trough concentrations in 57 RTRs aged<br />

35.68±8.46 years and 59.6% were males.<br />

Posttransplantation renal function was<br />

analyzed based on serum creatinine and<br />

creatinine clearance. Demographic and<br />

clinical data were collected with a patient<br />

interview during their routine outpatient<br />

visits and from medical files.<br />

Results: Twenty seven RTRs (47.3%)<br />

were smokers, while 30 (52.7%) were<br />

nonsmokers. Smoker recipients required<br />

30% (0.21±0.08 mg/kg/day) significantly<br />

higher doses (mg/kg/day) than those of<br />

nonsmoker recipients (0.146±0.10 mg/<br />

kg/day) (p-value=0.02) in order to achieve<br />

target level of 5-7 ng/ml. At the same time<br />

smokers show (50%) lower dose adjusted<br />

Tacrolimus trough level (106.8±45.4 ng/<br />

ml per mg/kg/day) versus nonsmoker<br />

recipients (194.24±111 ng/ml per mg/<br />

kg /day), (p=0.007). Smokers show<br />

significantly higher serum creatinine than<br />

nonsmoker RTRs (p=0.005).<br />

Conclusion: The present study finds that<br />

smoking is prevalent among Jordanian<br />

PTRs. Also the study concludes that<br />

Smokers RTRs require higher doses of<br />

tacrolimus than that of nonsmoker RTRs.<br />

Concurrently, smoker RTRs will show mean<br />

www.jrms.gov.jo<br />

214

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!