27.03.2014 Views

kansas appellate practice handbook - Kansas Judicial Branch

kansas appellate practice handbook - Kansas Judicial Branch

kansas appellate practice handbook - Kansas Judicial Branch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appellate Jurisdiction 5-15<br />

ability to prosecute the case or when <strong>appellate</strong> jurisdiction is challenged by<br />

the defendant-appellee. State v. Sales, 290 Kan. 130, Syl. 5, 224 P.3d 546<br />

(2010); Newman, 235 Kan. at 35. There is, however, no similar threshold<br />

requirement in an appeal from a pretrial order suppressing a confession<br />

or admission. State v. Mooney, 10 Kan. App. 2d 477, 479, 702 P.2d 328, rev.<br />

denied 38 Kan. 879 (1985). In dicta, the Mooney court also indicated there<br />

was no such threshold requirement in an appeal from a pretrial order<br />

quashing a warrant or search warrant. Mooney, 10 Kan. App. 2d at 479.<br />

There is no mechanism for the State to appeal from an order denying<br />

revocation of a diversion agreement or probation. State v. McDaniels, 237<br />

Kan. 767, 772, 703 P.2d 789 (1985). This does not mean, however, that<br />

the State can never question an order denying revocation of a diversion<br />

agreement. In McDaniels, the court stated, “Until the legislature chooses<br />

to create a right in the State to appeal from a pretrial order denying the<br />

State’s request to revoke diversion, the State may not appeal prior to the<br />

completion of the diversion and the dismissal of the case by the district<br />

court.” McDaniels, 237 Kan. at 772. The State may, however, “appeal after<br />

the dismissal, and if the appeal is sustained, the defendant may be tried.”<br />

McDaniels, 237 Kan. at 771. Likewise, a defendant may not appeal from<br />

the court’s decision to terminate pretrial diversion and reinstate criminal<br />

prosecution. State v. Cameron, 32 Kan. App. 2d 187, 81 P.3d 442 (2003).<br />

Further proceedings in the trial court will be stayed pending<br />

determination of the interlocutory appeal. K.S.A. 22-3603. The time<br />

during which an interlocutory appeal is pending “shall not be counted for<br />

the purpose of determining whether a defendant is entitled to discharge”<br />

under the speedy trial statute, K.S.A. 22-3402. K.S.A. 22-3604(2). The<br />

general rule is that a defendant shall not be held in jail nor subject to an<br />

appearance bond during the pendency of an appeal by the prosecution.<br />

K.S.A. 22-3604(1). The exception to this general rule is that a defendant<br />

charged with an off-grid felony, a nondrug severity level 1 through 5 felony<br />

or a drug severity level 1 through 4 felony crime “shall not be released<br />

from jail or the conditions of such person’s appearance bond during the<br />

pendency of an appeal by the prosecution.” K.S.A. 22-3604(3). This rule<br />

also applies to a defendant charged with a class A, B or C felony prior to<br />

the enactment of the <strong>Kansas</strong> Sentencing Guidelines Act in 1993.<br />

2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!