- Page 1 and 2: Date: April 12, 2013 Topic: The Shr
- Page 4 and 5: PROGRAM AGENDA & ROOM LOCATIONS The
- Page 6 and 7: Things to do in Washington, D.C. Wa
- Page 9: The Shrinking Pyramid: Implications
- Page 13 and 14: DRAFT IN PROGRESS—PLEASE DO NOT C
- Page 15 and 16: legal services based upon data aggr
- Page 17 and 18: on a consistent, sustained basis. T
- Page 19 and 20: the marketing concept or market(ing
- Page 21 and 22: Technology and online access democr
- Page 23 and 24: portion of their curated informatio
- Page 25 and 26: in the United States and Britain, a
- Page 27 and 28: whether some activities traditional
- Page 29 and 30: Without the necessary systems or pr
- Page 31 and 32: While net promoter score is not a p
- Page 33 and 34: Today, LegalZoom offers a broad por
- Page 35 and 36: 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11
- Page 37 and 38: Clementi submitted his report in De
- Page 39 and 40: experience, skills and competencies
- Page 41 and 42: away disk drive space. The question
- Page 43 and 44: Riverview’s high-end services are
- Page 45 and 46: need of an overhaul. These “new k
- Page 47 and 48: These are exciting times for those
- Page 49 and 50: The introduction of a new technolog
- Page 51 and 52: Before turning to our main quantita
- Page 53 and 54: H2: Wider document download pattern
- Page 55 and 56: Independent variables Technology us
- Page 57 and 58: Our research reconciles these two d
- Page 59 and 60: REFERENCES Alavi, M., Leidner, D. E
- Page 61 and 62:
Table 1: Representative Excerpts fr
- Page 63 and 64:
Table 2: Descriptive Statistics Var
- Page 65:
Table 4: Results of Individual Fixe
- Page 68:
There are no materials for this ses
- Page 71 and 72:
1 DECONSTRUCTING BIG LAW The Future
- Page 73 and 74:
The Stanford Law School Research Pr
- Page 75 and 76:
2011 General Counsel with Power
- Page 77 and 78:
Executive Summary of Key Findin
- Page 79 and 80:
General Counsel with Power? 201
- Page 81 and 82:
General Counsel with Power? 201
- Page 83 and 84:
General Counsel with Power? 201
- Page 85 and 86:
General Counsel with Power? 201
- Page 87 and 88:
General Counsel with Power? 201
- Page 89 and 90:
General Counsel with Power? 201
- Page 91 and 92:
General Counsel with Power? 201
- Page 93 and 94:
General Counsel with Power? 201
- Page 95 and 96:
General Counsel with Power? 201
- Page 97 and 98:
General Counsel with Power? 201
- Page 99 and 100:
General Counsel with Power? 201
- Page 101 and 102:
General Counsel with Power? 201
- Page 103 and 104:
General Counsel with Power? 201
- Page 105 and 106:
General Counsel with Power? 201
- Page 107 and 108:
Resource Co-Specialization and Supp
- Page 109 and 110:
al., 2009), plural sourcing (Bradac
- Page 111 and 112:
ely more on R&D resources, advertis
- Page 113 and 114:
and from transferring best practice
- Page 115 and 116:
specialized tasks such as complex a
- Page 117 and 118:
also distinct from economies of sco
- Page 119 and 120:
In case studies of innovating firms
- Page 121 and 122:
knowledge. This translates into a r
- Page 123 and 124:
To be included in our sample, we re
- Page 125 and 126:
Law firms. In order to measure the
- Page 127 and 128:
More specifically, we estimate a st
- Page 129 and 130:
of sample means indicate more in-ho
- Page 131 and 132:
services. The coefficient for selli
- Page 133 and 134:
study design and accounted explicit
- Page 135 and 136:
These in-house legal departments ca
- Page 137 and 138:
usiness benefits only if resource c
- Page 139 and 140:
Dick the Butcher, wishes for lawyer
- Page 141 and 142:
Gulati R, Puranam P. 2006. Compleme
- Page 143 and 144:
Sako M. 2013. Professionals between
- Page 145 and 146:
Table 3. Panel data regression mode
- Page 148 and 149:
The Shrinking Pyramid: Implications
- Page 150 and 151:
Limiting the Damage of Lateral Part