Date: April 12, 2013 Topic: The Shrinking ... - Georgetown Law

More documents

Recommendations

Info

<strong>The</strong>re are no materials for this session.
Page 1 and 2:
Date: April 12, 2013 Topic: The Shr
Page 4 and 5:
PROGRAM AGENDA & ROOM LOCATIONS The
Page 6 and 7:
Things to do in Washington, D.C. Wa
Page 9 and 10:
The Shrinking Pyramid: Implications
Page 11 and 12:
III
Page 13 and 14:
DRAFT IN PROGRESS—PLEASE DO NOT C
Page 15 and 16:
legal services based upon data aggr
Page 17 and 18: on a consistent, sustained basis. T
Page 19 and 20: the marketing concept or market(ing
Page 21 and 22: Technology and online access democr
Page 23 and 24: portion of their curated informatio
Page 25 and 26: in the United States and Britain, a
Page 27 and 28: whether some activities traditional
Page 29 and 30: Without the necessary systems or pr
Page 31 and 32: While net promoter score is not a p
Page 33 and 34: Today, LegalZoom offers a broad por
Page 35 and 36: 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11
Page 37 and 38: Clementi submitted his report in De
Page 39 and 40: experience, skills and competencies
Page 41 and 42: away disk drive space. The question
Page 43 and 44: Riverview’s high-end services are
Page 45 and 46: need of an overhaul. These “new k
Page 47 and 48: These are exciting times for those
Page 49 and 50: The introduction of a new technolog
Page 51 and 52: Before turning to our main quantita
Page 53 and 54: H2: Wider document download pattern
Page 55 and 56: Independent variables Technology us
Page 57 and 58: Our research reconciles these two d
Page 59 and 60: REFERENCES Alavi, M., Leidner, D. E
Page 61 and 62: Table 1: Representative Excerpts fr
Page 63 and 64: Table 2: Descriptive Statistics Var
Page 65: Table 4: Results of Individual Fixe
Page 70 and 71: The Shrinking Pyramid: Implications
Page 72 and 73: current economic turmoil. During th
Page 74 and 75: The product of the project will be
Page 76 and 77: General Counsel with Power? 201
Page 108 and 109: Resource Co-Specialization and Supp
Page 110 and 111: In this paper we build on recent pr
Page 112 and 113: comparison of costs associated with
Page 114 and 115: concentration, and its subsequent i
Page 116 and 117: specialized complementary assets (A
Page 118 and 119:
incentives. Yet, a strong legal exp
Page 120 and 121:
astuteness’ is a valuable dynamic
Page 122 and 123:
concentrated panel of law firms inv
Page 124 and 125:
changes in the make-and-buy mix, we
Page 126 and 127:
legal work to be done in-house or e
Page 128 and 129:
is unbalanced. This minimizes data
Page 130 and 131:
We look primarily to results in Mod
Page 132 and 133:
area. As it stands, our measure sug
Page 134 and 135:
[W]e have a large research centre o
Page 136 and 137:
A third research implication relate
Page 138 and 139:
personnel or hours worked. We deal
Page 140 and 141:
Baker G, Gibbons R, Murphy KJ. 2002
Page 142 and 143:
Moeen M, Somaya D, Mahoney JT. 2013
Page 144 and 145:
Table 1. Variable names, descriptio
Page 146:
Figures 1A-E. Locally-weighted scat
Page 149 and 150:
Variation in Large Law Firm Career
Page 151:
focused firms. The redundancy of pa
show all

Date: April 12, 2013 Topic: The Shrinking ... - Georgetown Law

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?