Date: April 12, 2013 Topic: The Shrinking ... - Georgetown Law
Date: April 12, 2013 Topic: The Shrinking ... - Georgetown Law
Date: April 12, 2013 Topic: The Shrinking ... - Georgetown Law
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Today, LegalZoom offers a broad portfolio of interactive legal documents that<br />
customers can tailor to their specific needs through using dynamic online processes and<br />
scalable technology. LegalZoom’s interactive legal documents are designed for use, as<br />
appropriate, at the federal level, as well as in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and<br />
approximately 2,900 U.S. counties. LegalZoom’s interactive legal document services for<br />
small businesses include limited liability company formations, incorporations and<br />
trademark applications and for consumers include wills, living trusts and powers of<br />
attorney. Customer demand for these transactional offerings has remained very strong<br />
with recent quarterly order volume remaining at over 100,000 transactions with high<br />
points of over 150,000 92 .<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
Orders Placed<br />
(Thousands)<br />
This order volume not only provides revenues, but also provides LegalZoom with<br />
unique insight into the legal needs of small businesses and consumers. LegalZoom<br />
leverages that legal knowledge and team of experienced, in-house attorneys, often in<br />
consultation with outside attorneys from across the United States, to design, review and<br />
maintain their services. <strong>The</strong> high volume of transactions handled and the feedback<br />
received from customers and government agencies give LegalZoom a scale advantage<br />
that enables development of additional services to address their customers' needs and<br />
refine their business processes.<br />
Subscription Legal Plans<br />
LegalZoom’s understanding of their customer’s needs eventually led to<br />
significant changes to the business. Where once there was a great deal of room to work<br />
with true DIY customers, LegalZoom began to see more customers in need of legal<br />
advice. Due to Unauthorized Practice of <strong>Law</strong> and Corporate Practice of <strong>Law</strong> statutes,<br />
LegalZoom employees could not provide such assistance. Further, due to Model Rule 5.4<br />
and its various incarnations across the US, LegalZoom could not, even if desired, develop<br />
or invest in a law firm to assist customers in these matters 93 . While lead generation<br />
between non-lawyer websites and lawyer was becoming increasingly accepted,<br />
92 LegalZoom.com, Inc. S1<br />
93 While customer or client demand for such arrangements appears to be high, the US legal industry has been resistant to allowing practitioners<br />
and firms to partner with or be owned by non-lawyers. A common fear is that doing so would give non-lawyers direct or indirect control over<br />
lawyers’ professional judgment. However, many in the industry are calling for reforms which would allow partnerships with outside non-lawyer<br />
professionals, the granting of partner status or ownership to such professionals within law firms, and even stock ownership of firms by the public.<br />
According to proponents, such reforms would increase clients’ access to firms, allow firms to raise much-needed capital, and help firms attract<br />
and retain talent, among other benefits. <strong>The</strong>se calls are growing stronger given recent developments in England and an increa sing focus on access<br />
to justice, but agreement on the matter is rather far off on the horizon. Indeed, the last time the matter came before the ABA the delegates, against<br />
the recommendations of the counsel set up to study the issue, voted resoundingly against non-lawyer ownership.<br />
21