27.04.2014 Views

Date: April 12, 2013 Topic: The Shrinking ... - Georgetown Law

Date: April 12, 2013 Topic: The Shrinking ... - Georgetown Law

Date: April 12, 2013 Topic: The Shrinking ... - Georgetown Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Today, LegalZoom offers a broad portfolio of interactive legal documents that<br />

customers can tailor to their specific needs through using dynamic online processes and<br />

scalable technology. LegalZoom’s interactive legal documents are designed for use, as<br />

appropriate, at the federal level, as well as in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and<br />

approximately 2,900 U.S. counties. LegalZoom’s interactive legal document services for<br />

small businesses include limited liability company formations, incorporations and<br />

trademark applications and for consumers include wills, living trusts and powers of<br />

attorney. Customer demand for these transactional offerings has remained very strong<br />

with recent quarterly order volume remaining at over 100,000 transactions with high<br />

points of over 150,000 92 .<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Orders Placed<br />

(Thousands)<br />

This order volume not only provides revenues, but also provides LegalZoom with<br />

unique insight into the legal needs of small businesses and consumers. LegalZoom<br />

leverages that legal knowledge and team of experienced, in-house attorneys, often in<br />

consultation with outside attorneys from across the United States, to design, review and<br />

maintain their services. <strong>The</strong> high volume of transactions handled and the feedback<br />

received from customers and government agencies give LegalZoom a scale advantage<br />

that enables development of additional services to address their customers' needs and<br />

refine their business processes.<br />

Subscription Legal Plans<br />

LegalZoom’s understanding of their customer’s needs eventually led to<br />

significant changes to the business. Where once there was a great deal of room to work<br />

with true DIY customers, LegalZoom began to see more customers in need of legal<br />

advice. Due to Unauthorized Practice of <strong>Law</strong> and Corporate Practice of <strong>Law</strong> statutes,<br />

LegalZoom employees could not provide such assistance. Further, due to Model Rule 5.4<br />

and its various incarnations across the US, LegalZoom could not, even if desired, develop<br />

or invest in a law firm to assist customers in these matters 93 . While lead generation<br />

between non-lawyer websites and lawyer was becoming increasingly accepted,<br />

92 LegalZoom.com, Inc. S1<br />

93 While customer or client demand for such arrangements appears to be high, the US legal industry has been resistant to allowing practitioners<br />

and firms to partner with or be owned by non-lawyers. A common fear is that doing so would give non-lawyers direct or indirect control over<br />

lawyers’ professional judgment. However, many in the industry are calling for reforms which would allow partnerships with outside non-lawyer<br />

professionals, the granting of partner status or ownership to such professionals within law firms, and even stock ownership of firms by the public.<br />

According to proponents, such reforms would increase clients’ access to firms, allow firms to raise much-needed capital, and help firms attract<br />

and retain talent, among other benefits. <strong>The</strong>se calls are growing stronger given recent developments in England and an increa sing focus on access<br />

to justice, but agreement on the matter is rather far off on the horizon. Indeed, the last time the matter came before the ABA the delegates, against<br />

the recommendations of the counsel set up to study the issue, voted resoundingly against non-lawyer ownership.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!