Date: April 12, 2013 Topic: The Shrinking ... - Georgetown Law
Date: April 12, 2013 Topic: The Shrinking ... - Georgetown Law
Date: April 12, 2013 Topic: The Shrinking ... - Georgetown Law
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
General Counsel with Power? 2011 <br />
Chapter 5: What <strong>Law</strong>yers Do in a World of Multi-sourcing <br />
Once legal work is disaggregated into constituent tasks, the in-‐house legal department must consider <br />
the most efficient and effective way of sourcing each task. In the last several years, the portfolio of <br />
possible sources of legal service has expanded – hence the notion of multi-‐sourcing – as new providers <br />
and new locations have become available. Up until recently, the only thick pipeline of legal advisory <br />
work that mattered was the one connecting the corporation to the law firm. Whilst this will continue to <br />
be important, the corporation now has a diverse set of sourcing options, ranging from (i) offshoring a <br />
captive in-‐house legal department (as GE had done); (ii) relying on law firms to set up a captive low-‐cost <br />
centre (as Clifford Chance or Baker & McKenzie have done); (iii) sourcing from contract lawyers on a <br />
project-‐by-‐project basis; to (iv) going direct to new legal services providers that have a global presence <br />
(as Rio Tinto did with CPA Global) (see Figure 5). Despite these emergent models for sourcing legal <br />
services, the offshore legal process outsourcing (LPO) sector remains a mere drop in the ocean, around <br />
$500 million in revenue, or 0.1% of the worldwide legal market worth around $500 billion in 2010 <br />
(Datamonitor, 2010). <br />
Figure 5: Global value chain in legal services <br />
19 <br />
Said Business School | University of Oxford