30.04.2014 Views

Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation

Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation

Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hon. J. I. Klein -34- June 26, 2007<br />

Nevertheless, I prefer <strong>to</strong> do the least damage. If OSI reopens the<br />

investigation <strong>to</strong> answer the unanswered questions, I see no need <strong>to</strong> contact<br />

Mr. Condon.” 108 OSI did not re-open the investigation. Nobile never<br />

contacted SCI.<br />

• July 11, 2005 at 7:41 p.m. – Best replied that he had forwarded Nobile’s<br />

e-mail <strong>to</strong> <strong>Special</strong> <strong>Commissioner</strong> Condon.<br />

• July 11, 2005 at 8:17 p.m. – Nobile e-mailed Best <strong>to</strong> inform him: “The<br />

Chancellor and I have issues <strong>to</strong> discuss independent <strong>of</strong> the current<br />

investigation -- like whistleblower protection, the ubiquity <strong>of</strong> scrubbing<br />

that he condemns, and a better system <strong>of</strong> reporting corruption so that<br />

Tweed is not kept in the dark about criminal matters.” Nobile asked<br />

whether the Chancellor would meet with him and whether they should<br />

seek <strong>Commissioner</strong> Condon’s permission. Nobile asked Best for a<br />

response <strong>to</strong> his inquiry about the propriety <strong>of</strong> allowing Pelles, “a disgraced<br />

LIS who covered up a crime,” <strong>to</strong> continue her supervision <strong>of</strong> the school.<br />

He concluded the message: “Since the [New York] Times is interviewing<br />

me <strong>to</strong>morrow for a lengthy s<strong>to</strong>ry, I would appreciate a response before<br />

2:30pm [sic].”<br />

• July 12, 2005 at 2:41 p.m. – Best responded <strong>to</strong> Nobile that a meeting was<br />

inappropriate given that the matter had been referred <strong>to</strong> SCI. 109 He also<br />

pointed out the substantial protections in place for whistleblowers.<br />

When Best declined <strong>to</strong> engage in a colloquy with Nobile about Pelles, Lyles, and<br />

Farina, Nobile questioned Lyles directly. He also used her as a conduit <strong>to</strong> George.<br />

• July 21, 2005 at 2:04 p.m. – Nobile e-mailed Lyles, attached a copy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

April 4, 2004, <strong>letter</strong> he wrote <strong>to</strong> her at the direction <strong>of</strong> the NYSED, and<br />

then questioned her about her interaction with Pelles and Farina with<br />

respect <strong>to</strong> the <strong>Cobble</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> Regents allegations.<br />

• July 21, 2005 at 2:47 p.m. – Lyles responded by thanking Nobile for a<br />

copy <strong>of</strong> the <strong>letter</strong>.<br />

• July 25, 2005 at 1:31 p.m. – Nobile sent an e-mail meant for George <strong>to</strong><br />

Lyles and asked her <strong>to</strong> pass it on <strong>to</strong> him. Nobile’s message <strong>to</strong> George<br />

referred <strong>to</strong> the OSI report and he wrote: “The final report <strong>of</strong> the Office <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Special</strong> <strong>Investigation</strong> is now public. The question <strong>of</strong> credibility is settled.<br />

108 Richard J. Condon is the <strong>Special</strong> <strong>Commissioner</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Investigation</strong> for the New York City School District.<br />

109 SCI was already reviewing the entire <strong>Cobble</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> matter. SCI did not open a case on Best’s referral.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!