30.04.2014 Views

Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation

Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation

Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hon. J. I. Klein -7- June 26, 2007<br />

Vincent Leardi<br />

At the time <strong>of</strong> his April 4, 2004, <strong>letter</strong> which helped launch the <strong>Cobble</strong> <strong>Hill</strong><br />

investigation, untenured Teacher Vincent Leardi was on leave for Res<strong>to</strong>ration <strong>of</strong> Health<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> his “bipolar Manic Depressive Disorder.” 24 By his own admission in the<br />

Leardi <strong>letter</strong>, the teacher had unrequited feelings for Capra which he described as “an<br />

emotional infatuation” with the assistant principal. 25 The Leardi <strong>letter</strong> alleged that he saw<br />

Capra “personally change grades” during the scoring <strong>of</strong> the June 2003 Regents, adding<br />

that he “could not swear that these [changes] were not legitimate but the climate was one<br />

<strong>of</strong> desperation.” 26 Leardi also wrote that teachers, including him, “were asked <strong>to</strong> review<br />

grades in the 60’s [sic].” Leardi asserted that he would “testify <strong>to</strong> this under immunity<br />

and strict confidentiality.” 27<br />

On May 12, 2004, during his leave, Leardi was interviewed at OSI. The report<br />

indicated that Scarcella advised Leardi that no disciplinary action would be taken against<br />

him regarding the investigation. The Scarcella report described Leardi’s cheating during<br />

the scoring <strong>of</strong> the 2003 Global His<strong>to</strong>ry Regents at <strong>Cobble</strong> <strong>Hill</strong>. According <strong>to</strong> the report,<br />

Leardi had come forward because Capra was treating Nobile unfairly and giving Nobile<br />

<strong>to</strong>o many “‘Unsatisfac<strong>to</strong>ry’” ratings. 28 By Scarcella’s account, Leardi said that Capra had<br />

“‘blessed’” changing failing grades <strong>to</strong> passing. Scarcella also wrote that one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reasons Leardi agreed <strong>to</strong> change the failures was because he “wanted <strong>to</strong> please Ms.<br />

Capra.” The report indicated that, according <strong>to</strong> Leardi, “the required third reader was not<br />

practiced” and, instead, Capra said <strong>to</strong> “‘scrub them’” which meant “<strong>to</strong> pass a failing<br />

examination.” 29<br />

Kenneth Kaufman<br />

Teacher Kenneth Kaufman, who left his employment at <strong>Cobble</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> in June 2003,<br />

was interviewed at OSI in May 2004, in the presence <strong>of</strong> his UFT representative. The<br />

report indicated that Scarcella advised Kaufman that no disciplinary action would be<br />

24 This information was included in Leardi’s <strong>letter</strong>.<br />

25 Scarcella’s file contained two copies <strong>of</strong> the Leardi <strong>letter</strong>; each had a different signature. At the George<br />

proceeding, Leardi testified that he had signed both documents and claimed that he sometimes used<br />

different signatures. See the transcript at pages 1103 and 1104.<br />

26 According <strong>to</strong> the Scarcella report, regarding the June 2003, grading <strong>of</strong> the Regents, Nobile <strong>to</strong>ld him<br />

“there was a sense <strong>of</strong> desperation in the correction room and the scrubbing began.”<br />

27 In a March 2004, e-mail <strong>to</strong> the NYSED, Nobile suggested the idea <strong>of</strong> granting immunity <strong>to</strong> <strong>Cobble</strong> <strong>Hill</strong><br />

witnesses.<br />

28 An observation is a single occurrence. The outcome – “S” for satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry or “U” for unsatisfac<strong>to</strong>ry – is<br />

commonly referred <strong>to</strong> as a rating. An <strong>of</strong>ficial end <strong>of</strong> year rating is a culmination <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> observations.<br />

29 In contrast, at the George proceeding, Leardi testified that a third reader was used in the grading process.<br />

See the transcript at page 1114.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!