30.04.2014 Views

Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation

Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation

Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hon. J. I. Klein -55- June 26, 2007<br />

• February 25, 2004 – in a <strong>letter</strong> <strong>to</strong> George, Nobile claimed that, for the past<br />

two academic years, Capra had systematically directed the changing <strong>of</strong><br />

Regents grades during correction sessions in her <strong>of</strong>fice. 194 Nobile stated<br />

that he was present at these sessions, but did not take part in changing<br />

grades. 195 He added that exams close <strong>to</strong> the passing grade <strong>of</strong> 65 were set<br />

aside. He claimed that the essay and DBQ scores, which allowed for some<br />

subjectivity, were erased and raised <strong>to</strong> achieve a passing grade.<br />

• March 3, 2004 – at a Step I grievance hearing regarding Capra’s January<br />

6, 2004, <strong>letter</strong> <strong>to</strong> Nobile’s file for which he received a “U” rating, Nobile<br />

stated that there was an “understanding” that Capra would not visit his<br />

classroom. George denied Nobile’s grievance and stated “[a]ssuming<br />

arguendo” that there was an “understanding,” neither Nobile nor the<br />

Administration had the authority <strong>to</strong> make such an arrangement. 196<br />

• March 6, 2004 – Nobile wrote an e-mail <strong>to</strong> Charles Friedman, UFT<br />

representative, <strong>to</strong> memorialize a conversation that Nobile and Friedman<br />

had with George, in which they attempted <strong>to</strong> persuade George not <strong>to</strong> allow<br />

Capra <strong>to</strong> observe Nobile. 197<br />

• March 9, 2004 – in a <strong>letter</strong> <strong>to</strong> George, Nobile claimed that Capra created<br />

an atmosphere where honest correction was discouraged. 198<br />

• March 24, 2004 – Capra gave Nobile a “U” rating. 199<br />

• March 26, 2004 – in an e-mail message <strong>to</strong> George, Nobile wrote:<br />

“Clearly, Ms. Capra’s two recent unsatisfac<strong>to</strong>ry observations are part <strong>of</strong><br />

her plan <strong>to</strong> drive me out <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cobble</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> and the pr<strong>of</strong>ession. I predicted this<br />

194 Nobile failed <strong>to</strong> report any <strong>of</strong> this alleged activity <strong>to</strong> SCI. Nobile made this verbal allegation <strong>to</strong> George<br />

on February 24 th and George instructed Nobile <strong>to</strong> make his complaint in writing.<br />

195 Teacher Terrence Crosby testified at SCI that Nobile reminded Crosby that Nobile and Crosby had not<br />

been present for the scoring <strong>of</strong> the Regents.<br />

196 The emphasis was in the original text.<br />

197 Nobile asked Friedman <strong>to</strong> confirm that George had agreed <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r Capra’s observations <strong>of</strong> Nobile, in<br />

part, because Nobile’s wife was ill.<br />

198 Nobile also stated that, in June 2003, he informed Capra that a student had cheated. In June 2003, there<br />

was an e-mail exchange between Nobile and Capra pertaining <strong>to</strong> that allegation. However, at that time<br />

Nobile did not allege any scoring irregularities.<br />

199 A post-observation conference with Nobile was held on March 25, 2004. The “George <strong>letter</strong>,” which<br />

indicated that each teacher who signed it had <strong>to</strong>ld him that he/she had not witnessed any changing <strong>of</strong> grades<br />

without re-reading by teachers and that Capra had not ordered teachers <strong>to</strong> change grades, was dated March<br />

24, 2004.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!