Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation
Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation
Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Hon. J. I. Klein -44- June 26, 2007<br />
During cross-examination, Swords testified that he “didn’t need Mr. Nobile <strong>to</strong> tell<br />
[Swords] about that discussion because [Swords] was -- or that exchange, because<br />
[Swords] was present.” 135 Told that Nobile had testified in a manner consistent with the<br />
Scarcella report and then questioned whether he could be mistaken, Swords testified:<br />
“I’m sorry <strong>to</strong> say that I could not be mistaken. I’m certain <strong>of</strong> it.” 136<br />
The arbitra<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong> the George hearing described Swords’s testimony at that<br />
proceeding as follows:<br />
I find that the Department did not prove by a preponderance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
evidence that George “ignored” Nobile’s “attempts <strong>to</strong> alert him <strong>to</strong> grade<br />
tampering.” There were significant differences between the version <strong>of</strong><br />
events given by Nobile and those described by Swords. Unlike Philip<br />
Nobile, who clearly had a vendetta against Capra and George, I found<br />
Swords <strong>to</strong> be a thoughtful and careful witness. In light <strong>of</strong> his testimony, it<br />
appears that at the time that Nobile brought up some question about<br />
Regents grading in the Spring <strong>of</strong> 2003, George was busy and distracted<br />
and essentially <strong>to</strong>ld Nobile that he didn’t have time <strong>to</strong> talk <strong>to</strong> him. As<br />
discussed [elsewhere in the arbitra<strong>to</strong>r’s decision], Nobile was constantly<br />
complaining <strong>to</strong> George about Capra and her treatment <strong>of</strong> him. If the<br />
incident <strong>to</strong>ok place as Swords described, George may well have assumed<br />
that this was just one more in this series <strong>of</strong> complaints by Nobile and<br />
brushed it <strong>of</strong>f in his preoccupation with other matte[r]s. 137 If Nobile had<br />
made his accusation as directly and clearly as he states he did, why<br />
wouldn’t George have responded as directly as he did when Nobile raised<br />
the accusation in February 2005 [sic]? 138<br />
Lennel George’s Testimony<br />
George testified in his own behalf at his disciplinary proceeding. He was<br />
questioned under oath on direct examination by his at<strong>to</strong>rney and was cross-examined by<br />
counsel representing the DOE. George denied the charges against him. George also<br />
testified that during his first interview at OSI, Scarcella threatened <strong>to</strong> have him removed<br />
from the school. George testified: “[Scarcella] said <strong>to</strong> me, ‘well, do you know <strong>to</strong>day is<br />
your last day as a principal?’” 139 Testimony from the CSA representative, who was<br />
present for George’s interview with Scarcella at OSI, confirmed Scarcella’s behavior and<br />
comment. 140<br />
135 The transcript at page 1862.<br />
136 The transcript at pages 1864 and 1865.<br />
137 According <strong>to</strong> Swords’s testimony at the proceeding, the verbal exchange in question, if it occurred, <strong>to</strong>ok<br />
place on a workday. According <strong>to</strong> Nobile’s testimony at the proceeding, the exchange happened in<br />
George’s <strong>of</strong>fice on a Saturday.<br />
138 This should be 2004. This excerpt is from page 17 <strong>of</strong> the arbitra<strong>to</strong>r’s final decision.<br />
139 The transcript at page 2397.<br />
140 During cross-examination at the George proceeding, Scarcella testified that he did not make that<br />
statement <strong>to</strong> George. See the transcript at pages 915 and 916.