30.04.2014 Views

Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation

Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation

Cobble Hill letter to klein - Special Commissioner of Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hon. J. I. Klein -62- June 26, 2007<br />

The New Principal<br />

In an interview with investiga<strong>to</strong>rs conducted under oath at the SCI <strong>of</strong>fice,<br />

Principal Kenneth Cuthbert, George’s successor at <strong>Cobble</strong> <strong>Hill</strong>, testified that Nobile had<br />

repeatedly asked <strong>to</strong> be removed from Thomas’s supervision. Cuthbert acquiesced and<br />

Nobile is no longer observed by and does not report <strong>to</strong> Thomas.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The SCI review has concluded that the OSI investigation was flawed from its<br />

inception. The investiga<strong>to</strong>r was unsupervised and acted as an agent <strong>of</strong> a complainant. In<br />

reality, no witness provided credible evidence <strong>to</strong> support the accusations concerning<br />

Capra and George.<br />

The SCI investigation found no evidence <strong>of</strong> a cover-up by Region 8 <strong>of</strong>ficials,<br />

specifically Lyles and Farina.<br />

The SCI investigation also found that the OLS prosecution <strong>of</strong> George<br />

detrimentally relied upon the faulty findings <strong>of</strong> the Scarcella investigation and report.<br />

Based on our extensive review <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Cobble</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> matter, we drew a number <strong>of</strong><br />

specific conclusions.<br />

The OSI <strong>Investigation</strong><br />

Scarcella<br />

In his <strong>Cobble</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> investigation, Scarcella made a number <strong>of</strong> investigative<br />

missteps. Scarcella did not question Nobile’s credibility and was biased from the onset.<br />

In the end, Scarcella based his findings on Nobile’s predetermined conclusions rather<br />

than the evidence.<br />

• When Scarcella first met Nobile at <strong>Cobble</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> on May 5, 2004, Nobile<br />

claimed that he had been “rated satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry until” he made a complaint <strong>of</strong><br />

Regents tampering against Capra. Although this assertion was easily<br />

verifiable, Scarcella either failed <strong>to</strong> do so or ignored the fact that Nobile<br />

previously had received unsatisfac<strong>to</strong>ry observations.<br />

• Scarcella allowed Nobile <strong>to</strong> direct the investigation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!