12.05.2014 Views

purcc 2012 - University of the Pacific

purcc 2012 - University of the Pacific

purcc 2012 - University of the Pacific

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster Session Abstracts<br />

Views on Current Events<br />

Amir Cruz-Khalili, Sadaf Sahibzada, Marissa<br />

Davis, Tabrisha Johnican<br />

Faculty Mentor: Gary Howells,<br />

Rocci Jackson (Graduate student)<br />

Previous research has examined implicit or<br />

indirect discrimination before and after events<br />

that have fostered <strong>the</strong> national fear <strong>of</strong> Islam<br />

(Sheridan, 2006). This study will explore<br />

Islamophobia, looking at opinions on current<br />

events throughout <strong>the</strong> world, with or without<br />

exposure to a historical source. It is presumed<br />

that with <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a biased historical video<br />

clip, participants will rank higher on an<br />

Islamophobia scale compared to those not<br />

exposed. Thirty participants will be recruited<br />

from a small, private <strong>University</strong> in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

California. Three conditions - <strong>the</strong> viewing <strong>of</strong> a<br />

historical clip, <strong>the</strong> viewing <strong>of</strong> a Muslim comedy,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> control group - will be run using a<br />

between-subjects ANOVA. The scores will be<br />

taken from a validated Islamophobia scale.<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study should reveal an association<br />

between <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a video clip and <strong>the</strong><br />

level <strong>of</strong> Islamophobia. Future studies should<br />

incorporate a larger sample size, a more diverse<br />

population, and an eclectic assortment <strong>of</strong> video<br />

clips and/or current events.<br />

War Attitudes Across Gender<br />

Alina Franco, Megan Rangel, Ginny<br />

Durakovich, Christina Thompson<br />

Faculty Mentor: Gary Howells,<br />

Rocci Jackson (Graduate student)<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study to evaluate gender<br />

differences in attitudes toward war and to<br />

determine whe<strong>the</strong>r exposure to positive or<br />

negative war information affects explicit attitude.<br />

Previous research has suggested that women are<br />

more willing to participate in peaceful<br />

encounters, have more consistent and positive<br />

attitudes towards conflict groups (Yablon, 2009).<br />

Therefore it is hypo<strong>the</strong>sized that women will<br />

hold more consistent and negative views toward<br />

war than men. Thirty participants (15 males, 15<br />

females) will be recruited from a small private<br />

university. Using a between-subjects design,<br />

participant’s attitudes toward war will be<br />

measured across two sessions using a 5-point<br />

Likert scale, 12- item survey from <strong>the</strong> Revised<br />

Attitudes Towards Violence Scale (2006) in<br />

combination with six student designed items. All<br />

participants will complete a pre-intervention<br />

survey before exposure to ei<strong>the</strong>r “pro war” or<br />

“pro peace” information. In <strong>the</strong> final session,<br />

participants will be given a second but similar<br />

survey to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r exposure to<br />

information regarding war elicited a change in<br />

attitude. Implications <strong>of</strong> this study may suggest<br />

gender differences in vulnerability to propaganda<br />

and could shed light on national military action<br />

over past years. Limitations include small<br />

sample size time constraints and experimenter<br />

presence may have influenced <strong>the</strong> responses <strong>of</strong><br />

participants. Future research could evaluate <strong>the</strong><br />

relationship between SES or ethnicity and<br />

attitudes toward war.<br />

Prosocial Behavior In Instances <strong>of</strong> Theft<br />

On College Campuses<br />

Tyler Glassford, Sean Kagan, Jonel Imutan,<br />

Nina Shenker<br />

Faculty Mentor: Gary Howells,<br />

Rocci Jackson (Graduate student)<br />

Prosocial behavior refers to <strong>the</strong> voluntary efforts<br />

one takes in order to benefit ano<strong>the</strong>r, even when<br />

<strong>the</strong>re appears to be no incentive or gain in doing<br />

so (Eisenberg, Fabes & Spinrad, 2007). Prosocial<br />

behavior can refer to acts as minimal as sharing<br />

and volunteering, or as significant as intervening<br />

in a violent crime. There may be many factors<br />

influencing one’s decision to be prosocial such<br />

as <strong>the</strong> timing and location <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> instance, <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r bystanders, etc. Alternatively,<br />

<strong>the</strong> bystander effect refers to instances when<br />

individuals refrain from engaging in prosocial<br />

behaviors as a situation presents itself. The<br />

question <strong>the</strong>n becomes, how and when does one<br />

decide to engage in prosocial behavior? The<br />

present study will investigate prosocial behavior<br />

<strong>of</strong> college students on a small university campus<br />

in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn California. Confederates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

study will leave <strong>the</strong>ir belongings unattended for<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r confederate to attempt to steal those<br />

belongings in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> an unaffiliated<br />

bystander. Prosocial behavior will be evaluated<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bystanders’ decision to intervene<br />

or not. It is hypo<strong>the</strong>sized that gender will<br />

influence one’s decision to engage in prosocial<br />

behavior.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!