23.05.2014 Views

Nuclear Spectroscopy

Nuclear Spectroscopy

Nuclear Spectroscopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SUGGESTED EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE<br />

1. Start the MCA, using the calibration of the previous<br />

lab exercise. Check the calibration using the<br />

137<br />

Cs source. The photopeak should be centered<br />

near 661.6 keV. If it is not within 10 keV of the<br />

accepted value, you may need to recalibrate your<br />

system. Be certain that your amplifier gain and/<br />

or detector bias voltage are such that the energy<br />

scale extends about 500 keV past the expected<br />

energy of the sum peak.<br />

2. Place the 22 Na source on the third shelf under the<br />

detector and acquire a spectrum until the net<br />

count in the sum peak is greater than 1,000.<br />

Record the gross count and net count of the sum<br />

peak and each gamma photopeak along with the<br />

live time.<br />

3. If there is enough time, repeat step 2 for 60 Co.<br />

DATA ANALYSIS<br />

From your data of photopeak counts and live time<br />

calculate the net count rate and the statistical error<br />

for each measurement made. Calculate the ratio of<br />

observed activities, as in equation 10.4, to determine<br />

the absolute activity of the source. If the source is<br />

previously calibrated, compare your measurements<br />

to that of the manufacturer’s, after correcting for<br />

decay from the date of calibration. Even uncalibrated<br />

sources have a nominal activity noted by the manufacturer.<br />

Assuming this activity to be correct, determine<br />

the date of the source’s preparation. If you have used<br />

the same 22 Na source in exercises 10.1 and 10.2, your<br />

values should agree within statistical errors.<br />

Determining the absolute activity of extended<br />

sources, especially environmental samples, is<br />

very challenging. The source to detector distance<br />

varies over the sample, as does the effective<br />

detector area. This difficulty is often compounded<br />

when a thick source self-shields itself<br />

from the detector. The problem is challenging<br />

but not impossible. Exercise 11.1 asks you to<br />

solve these problems for a very interesting measurement.<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!