23.05.2014 Views

Nuclear Spectroscopy

Nuclear Spectroscopy

Nuclear Spectroscopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

0.8<br />

which is coincident with the gamma from the 226 Ra<br />

decay. An enriched source will have a much larger<br />

peak at 185 keV than you have observed for the natural<br />

uranium ores.<br />

Activity<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

Pb-214<br />

Bi-214<br />

Exercise 13.2<br />

Gamma Spectra from Materials<br />

Containing Radium and Radon<br />

0.2<br />

ratio<br />

(Bi/Pb)<br />

0<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />

Time (min)<br />

Figure 13.3 Uranium daughter activities as a function of<br />

time.<br />

photopeaks with energies above 400 keV in your spectra?<br />

Refer to Figures 13.1 and 13.2 to guide your<br />

analysis.<br />

If the isotopes of a decay series, such as uranium, are<br />

left undisturbed, then the series approaches an equilibrium<br />

(see Figure 13.3) with the property that the<br />

activities of each isotope are the same (See the discussion<br />

in Appendix C). Using your measured net counts,<br />

the gamma decay factors from Appendix E, and the<br />

detector efficiency of Figure 10.1, calculate the ratio of<br />

measured activities relative to the activity of the 352<br />

keV photopeak from 214 Pb. The detector’s solid angle<br />

cancels in all ratios, so the use of the efficiencies from<br />

Figure 10.1 is valid for these calculations. Are the<br />

activity ratios of the gamma intensities from 214 Bi<br />

consistent with each other? Are the activity ratios from<br />

gammas emitted by 214 Pb and 214 Bi (and any other<br />

observed isotopes) consistent with each other, and<br />

should they be so? What are the statistical limitations<br />

to your net photopeak counts? If any photopeaks lie<br />

on Compton edges or overlap possible backscattering<br />

peaks, then your measurements of the net counts in<br />

those peaks is very suspect.<br />

If you located and observed an enriched uranium<br />

source, the signature gamma for 235 U decay series is<br />

the 185 keV gamma (from 54% of all 235 U decays),<br />

OBJECTIVE<br />

Observe gammas from sources containing radium and<br />

radon. Radon, an inert gas, can diffuse easily through<br />

many materials, disrupting the equilibrium activities<br />

of the rest of the decay series. Not all radium sources<br />

will show good series equilibrium, even if the sources<br />

are old enough for equilibrium to exist.<br />

SUPPLIES<br />

•Radon charcoal canister<br />

•An old clock or watch with a luminous (radium) dial<br />

•Brazil nuts (two pounds, shelled)<br />

SUGGESTED EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE<br />

1. Start the MCA and check your calibration, as in<br />

#13.1.<br />

2. Acquire and save a good spectrum from each<br />

radium/radon sample.<br />

3. Correct the spectra for background radiation.<br />

4. Place the charcoal canister in a basement with<br />

poor or no ventilation for a few days. Retrieve<br />

the canister and acquire a spectrum.<br />

5. Finely chop the Brazil nuts in a blender and store<br />

them in a plastic bag. Remove the detector from<br />

its shielding and cover it with a plastic bag. Surround<br />

the detector with the nuts, and surround<br />

the entire assemblage with lead or iron shielding.<br />

Acquire a spectrum from the nuts.<br />

DATA ANALYSIS<br />

Record the photopeak energies and net counts for all<br />

significant peaks that you observe in your spectra. The<br />

Brazil nuts and the clock contain the radium isotope,<br />

226<br />

Ra. Are the spectra of the two radium sources<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!