Hansard - United Kingdom Parliament

More documents

Recommendations

Info

107W Written Answers 20 JUNE 2011 Written Answers 108W Funding allocated to prisons in England and Wales for drug treatment £ million 2004-05 51.1 2005-06 60.7 2006-07 78.1 2007-08 79.8 2008-09 3 67.8 2009-10 69.6 2010-11 71.4 1 This includes £63 million for adult prisons and £6.4 million for young people’s secure settings. 2 Figures from 1999-2000 to 2007-08 include CARATs (Counselling, Assessment, Referral, Advice and Throughcare service), YPSMS (Young People’s Substance Misuse Services) and intensive drug rehabilitation programmes as well as funding from the Department of Health for clinical interventions (detoxification and maintenance prescribing). 3 Figures from 2008-09 to 2010-11 exclude Department of Health funding for clinical interventions. Probation Trusts Sadiq Khan: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how much his Department and its predecessor spent on probation trusts in each year since 1995; [60003] (2) what budget he has set for each probation trust in each year of the comprehensive spending review period. [60007] Mr Blunt: The information is as follows: Financial period 1995-96 to 2000-01 Prior to 2001-02, local probation committees were financed partly by local government under a different financial regime. NOMS are therefore unable to answer this element of the question. Financial period 2001-02 to 2009-10 Probation Trusts have only been in existence since April 2008, following the implementation of the Offender Management Act 2007. The following table has been compiled to illustrate the costs of probation boards/trusts over the 2001 to 2010 financial period using the annual net operating costs. Financial year Boards and Trusts expenditure £ million Trusts included in expenditure 2009-10 899 194 2008-09 897 112 2007-08 845 — 2006-07 807 — 2005-06 770 — 2004-05 687 — 2003-04 674 — 2002-03 605 — 2001-02 576 — Notes: 1. The figures for financial years 2001-02 to 2007-08 are the net operating costs recorded in the annual consolidated accounts of local probation boards. These accounts are available from the House Library. 2. The figures for 2008-09 and 2009-10 are taken from the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) Agency annual accounts and supporting data. 3. Following standard accounting practice, local boards. and trusts. pension contributions are not fully reflected in the figures. 4. Expenditure on probation met centrally by the National Probation Directorate (as was) and the National Offender Management Service is not included in local areas’ expenditure. 5. Comparisons over time are difficult due to changes in accounting methodology. Financial Year 2010-11 Data for 2010-11 are not yet available as financial accounts for the 2010-11 have yet to be finalised. Comprehensive Spending Review Period Year 2011-12 The following table sets out the contract values for financial year 2011-12 as agreed with each Probation Trust. These individual contract values may vary through the year but are as stated at the beginning of the financial year. There are some probation costs for specific offender related initiatives not embedded in the contracts and therefore excluded from the following table. Avon and Somerset 19,333,606 Bedfordshire 8,961,763 Cambridgeshire 9,477,363 Cheshire 14,128,825 Cumbria 8,044,553 Derbyshire 12,660,000 Devon and Cornwall 18,238,328 Dorset 8,456,415 Durham and Teesside 21,753,119 Essex 18,606,086 Gloucestershire 7,015,050 Greater Manchester 47,931,520 Hampshire 23,019,664 Hertfordshire 10,909,353 Humberside 15,730,000 Kent 19,483,690 Lancashire 23,061,088 Leicestershire 14,020,000 Lincolnshire 8,851,000 London 137,512,000 Merseyside 28,845,962 Norfolk and Suffolk 19,101,436 North Yorkshire 9,445,000 Northamptonshire 8,642,000 Northumbria 27,786,481 Nottinghamshire 18,018,000 South Yorkshire 23,589,000 Staffs/West Midlands 68,626,000 Surrey and Sussex 25,109,812 Thames Valley 24,602,317 Wales 52,297,000 Warwickshire 6,562,000 West Mercia 14,336,000 West Yorkshire 38,385,000 Wiltshire 6,932,312 Total 819,471,743 Comprehensive Spending Review Period: 2012 to 2015 Given the demanding settlement the Department received we are continuing to finalise our savings plans for the remainder of the SR period, and as a result detailed budgets for individual trusts are not yet available. Sadiq Khan: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what output measures his Department will use to assess the performance of probation trusts over the comprehensive spending review period. [59903] Mr Blunt: Orders or Licences Successfully Completed, Employment at Termination and Accommodation at Termination are the output measures which currently form part of the data-driven performance assessment of £
109W Written Answers 20 JUNE 2011 Written Answers 110W probation trusts. These output indicators compliment a range of measures in the Probation Trust Rating System (PTRS), including the key outcome Reducing Reoffending, quality measures from HMI Probation and engagement indicators such as Offender Feedback and Victim Feedback. In addition to the measures in the formal performance assessment, the probation contracts contain a number of targeted output measures including Sustained Employment, Education Awards, Sex Offender Treatment Programmes Completions, Domestic Violence Completions, Offending Behaviour Programme Completions, Drug Rehabilitation Requirement Completions, Alcohol Treatment Requirement Completions and Community Payback Completions among other measures used for assurance purposes. There is an annual cycle of review on measures, targets and the contents of the PTRS model. In line with this Government’s policy direction the review is focused to be less prescriptive with the aim of reducing the burden of data collection on the front line. The introduction of Payment By Results (PBR) will be reflected in the future performance framework. Rehabilitation and Treatment of Offenders Sadiq Khan: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how much funding for the rehabilitation and treatment of offenders was contributed to his Department’s programme by the (a) Department for Education and its predecessors, (b) Department of Health, (c) Department for Work and Pensions and its predecessors and (d) Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and its predecessors in each year since 1995. [59892] Mr Blunt: The Ministry of Justice does not hold information on the contribution by other Government Departments for the treatment and rehabilitation of offenders. It does hold information on income received from the Departments specified, but this may not be for rehabilitation or treatment and would only be part of the funding by those Departments. Most of the funding by those Departments will be made to service providers outside of the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) who provide services to offenders on behalf of their respective Departments. Remand in Custody Sadiq Khan: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people held on remand in 2010 (a) were subsequently acquitted, (b) received a community sentence and (c) received a custodial sentence. [59913] Mr Blunt: Defendants remanded at the magistrates and Crown courts, and outcome of proceedings in 2010, can be viewed in the tables as follows. Defendants remanded in custody by magistrates and outcome of proceedings 1 , 2010 2 , England and Wales Outcome Remanded in custody by magistrates 3 Acquitted or not proceeded etc. 7.2 Defendants remanded in custody by magistrates and outcome of proceedings 1 , 2010 2 , England and Wales Outcome Remanded in custody by magistrates 3 Immediate custody 5 8.5 Otherwise dealt with 6 1.7 Total number sentenced 19.4 Committed for sentence: on bail 0.5 in custody 5.1 Committed for trial: on bail 2.6 in custody 22.9 Total 58.3 1 Committal cases where the remand status is not recorded are excluded from the breakdown, but included in the totals. 2 Data for 2010 are estimated. 3 Includes those remanded for part of the time in custody and part on bail. 4 Includes community rehabilitation orders, supervision orders, community punishment orders, attendance centre orders, community punishment and rehabilitation orders, curfew orders, reparation orders, action plan orders and detention and training orders. 5 Includes detention and training orders and unsuspended imprisonment. 6 Includes one day in police cells, disqualification order, restraining order, confiscation order, travel restriction order, disqualification from driving, ASBO and recommendation for deportation and other disposals. Note: Some figures may not sum due to rounding. Defendants remanded at the Crown court 1 before trial or sentence, and outcome of proceedings, 2010, England and Wales Remanded in custody 2 Outcome Committed for trial Committed for sentence Acquitted or not proceeded etc. 4.7 0.0 Convicted: Discharge 0.2 0.0 Fine 0.0 0.0 Community sentence 3 2.0 0.7 Fully suspended sentence 1.9 0.8 Immediate custody 4 25.9 5.5 Otherwise dealt with 5 0.7 0.3 Total number sentenced 30.7 7.4 Failed to appear 0.2 0.0 Total 35.6 7.4 1 Crown court cases are not necessarily concluded in the same year as the committal. 2 Includes those remanded for part of the time in custody and part on bail. 3 Community rehabilitation orders, supervision orders, community punishment orders, attendance centre orders, community punishment and rehabilitation orders, curfew orders, reparation orders, action plan orders and drug treatment and testing orders. 4 Includes detention in a young offender institution, detention and training orders and unsuspended imprisonment. 5 Includes one day in police cells, disqualification order, restraining order, confiscation order, travel restriction order, disqualification from driving, ASBO and recommendation for deportation and other disposals. Note: Some figures may not sum due to rounding. Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services - Ministry of Justice. Young Offenders Convicted: Discharge 1.5 Fine 2.3 Community sentence 4 3.7 Suspended sentence 1.7 Ben Gummer: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what plans he has for future provision for young adult offenders aged (a) 18 to 21 and (b) 18 to 24 following the implementation of proposed changes to the functions of the Youth Justice Board. [59943]
Page 1 and 2:
Monday Volume 530 20 June 2011 No.
Page 3 and 4:
HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS
Page 5 and 6:
HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT—cont.
Page 7:
THE SPEAKER—The Rt Hon. John Berc
Page 10 and 11:
3 Oral Answers 20 JUNE 2011 Oral An
Page 12 and 13:
7 Oral Answers 20 JUNE 2011 Oral An
Page 14 and 15:
11 Oral Answers 20 JUNE 2011 Oral A
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
23 20 JUNE 2011 Eurozone (Contingen
Page 22 and 23:
27 Eurozone (Contingency Plans) 20
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
39 Points of Order 20 JUNE 2011 Poi
Page 30 and 31:
43 Pensions Bill [Lords] 20 JUNE 20
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
135 20 JUNE 2011 Private Gary Barlo
Page 78 and 79:
139 Private Gary Barlow 20 JUNE 201
Page 81:
1WS Written Ministerial Statements
Page 85 and 86:
1W Written Answers 20 JUNE 2011 Wri
Page 87 and 88: 5W Written Answers 20 JUNE 2011 Wri
Page 89 and 90: 9W Written Answers 20 JUNE 2011 Wri
Page 91 and 92: 13W Written Answers 20 JUNE 2011 Wr
Page 135 and 136: 101W Written Answers 20 JUNE 2011 W
Page 137: 105W Written Answers 20 JUNE 2011 W
Page 149: 129W Written Answers 20 JUNE 2011 W
Page 152 and 153: Col. No. COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVE
Page 154 and 155: Members who wish to have the Daily
show all

Hansard - United Kingdom Parliament

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?