04.06.2014 Views

Hansard - United Kingdom Parliament

Hansard - United Kingdom Parliament

Hansard - United Kingdom Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

133 20 JUNE 2011 Business without Debate<br />

134<br />

Proceedings in Public Bill Committee<br />

2. Proceedings in the Public Bill Committee shall (so far as not<br />

previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion on Tuesday<br />

19 July 2011.<br />

3. The Public Bill Committee shall have leave to sit twice on the<br />

first day on which it meets.<br />

Consideration and Third Reading<br />

4. Proceedings on consideration shall (so far as not previously<br />

concluded) be brought to a conclusion one hour before the<br />

moment of interruption on the day on which those proceedings<br />

are commenced.<br />

5. Proceedings on Third Reading shall (so far as not previously<br />

concluded) be brought to a conclusion at the moment of interruption<br />

on that day.<br />

6. Standing Order No. 83B (Programming committees) shall<br />

not apply to proceedings on consideration and Third Reading.<br />

Other proceedings<br />

7. Any other proceedings on the Bill (including any proceedings<br />

on consideration of any message from the Lords) may be<br />

programmed.—(Steve Webb.)<br />

Question agreed to.<br />

PENSIONS BILL [LORDS] (MONEY)<br />

Queen’s Recommendation signified.<br />

Motion made, and Question put forthwith (Standing<br />

Order No. 52(1)(a)),<br />

That, for the purposes of any Act resulting from the Pensions<br />

Bill [Lords], it is expedient to authorise the payment out of money<br />

provided by <strong>Parliament</strong> of—<br />

(1) any expenditure incurred in consequence of the Act by the<br />

Secretary of State, and<br />

(2) any increase attributable to the Act in the sums payable<br />

under any other Act out of money so provided.—(Steve Webb.)<br />

Question agreed to.<br />

PENSIONS BILL [LORDS] (WAYS AND MEANS)<br />

Motion made, and Question put forthwith (Standing<br />

Order No. 52(1)(a)),<br />

That, for the purposes of any Act resulting from the Pensions<br />

Bill [Lords], it is expedient to authorise—<br />

(1) the levying of charges under the Pension Schemes Act 1993<br />

for the purpose of meeting expenditure of the Secretary of State<br />

in making grants under that Act,<br />

and<br />

(2) the payment of sums into the Consolidated Fund.—(Steve<br />

Webb.)<br />

Question agreed to.<br />

Business without Debate<br />

DELEGATED LEGISLATION<br />

Mr Speaker: With the agreement of the House, we<br />

shall take motions 5 to 9 together.<br />

Motion made, and Question put forthwith (Standing<br />

Order No. 118(6)),<br />

TAXES<br />

That the draft International Tax Enforcement (Belize) Order 2011,<br />

which was laid before this House on 4 April, be approved.<br />

That the draft International Tax Enforcement (Dominica)<br />

Order 2011, which was laid before this House on 4 April, be<br />

approved.<br />

That the draft International Tax Enforcement (Grenada)<br />

Order 2011, which was laid before this House on 4 April, be<br />

approved.<br />

That the draft Double Taxation Relief (Qatar) Order 2011,<br />

which was laid before this House on 4 April, be approved.<br />

That the draft International Tax Enforcement (San Marino)<br />

Order 2011, which was laid before this House on 4 April, be<br />

approved.—(Stephen Crabb.)<br />

Question agreed to.<br />

Motion made, and Question put forthwith (Standing<br />

Order No. 118(6)),<br />

CONTRACTING OUT<br />

That the draft Contracting Out (Local Authorities Social<br />

Services Functions) (England) Order 2011, which was laid before<br />

this House on 10 May, be approved.—(Stephen Crabb.)<br />

Question agreed to.<br />

BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE<br />

Ordered,<br />

That, at the sitting on Tuesday 21 June, notwithstanding the<br />

provisions of paragraph (7) of Standing Order No. 83A (Programme<br />

motions), proceedings on the Motion in the name of Mr Secretary<br />

Lansley relating to Health and Social Care Bill (Programme)<br />

(No. 2) shall be brought to a conclusion not later than one hour<br />

after the commencement of proceedings on the Motion, at which<br />

time the Speaker shall put the Question; and no amendments to<br />

the Motion shall be moved.—(Sir George Young.)<br />

Mr Speaker: Before I invite the hon. Member for<br />

Broxbourne (Mr Walker) to present his petition, which<br />

I know Members will be eagerly anticipating, I appeal<br />

to right hon. and hon. Members who are leaving the<br />

Chamber to do so quickly and quietly, extending the<br />

same courtesy to the hon. Gentleman that they would<br />

want to be extended to them in such circumstances.<br />

PETITION<br />

Cheshunt Urgent Care Centre (Hertfordshire)<br />

10.19 pm<br />

Mr Charles Walker (Broxbourne) (Con): When coming<br />

here tonight, I received a text from Tony Siracusa, who<br />

said:<br />

“Tonight, Charles, you’re our voice. Please continue to ensure<br />

we are heard in the House of Commons.”<br />

I intend to do that this evening.<br />

Before I present the petition I should like to thank<br />

Paul Mason, the leader of Broxbourne council, who<br />

organised an excellent march in support of the urgent<br />

care centre about which I am petitioning tonight. I also<br />

thank our campaigning newspaper, the Mercury, and in<br />

particular Gemma Gardner and the editor Gary Matthews.<br />

The petition states:<br />

The Petition of residents of Broxbourne Borough and surrounding<br />

areas,<br />

Declares that the decision taken by Hertfordshire Primary<br />

Care Trust to close Cheshunt Urgent Care Centre (UCC) fails to<br />

recognise the importance and value of the UCC to the local<br />

community.<br />

The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons<br />

urges the Secretary of State for Health to use his offices to<br />

intervene in the matter to require the PCT to revisit its decision in<br />

regards to the UCC, and keep GP-led services operating at the<br />

site.<br />

And the Petitioners remain, etc.<br />

[P000930]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!