11.07.2014 Views

Multiattribute acceptance sampling plans - Library(ISI Kolkata ...

Multiattribute acceptance sampling plans - Library(ISI Kolkata ...

Multiattribute acceptance sampling plans - Library(ISI Kolkata ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.2 The expected cost model for discrete prior distributions<br />

2.2.1 Assumptions<br />

By Bayesian <strong>plans</strong> we understand the <strong>plans</strong> obtained by minimizing average costs which<br />

has three identifiable components viz. inspection costs, <strong>acceptance</strong> costs, and rejection<br />

costs. For these <strong>plans</strong> the process average defective is taken to be a random variable. In<br />

our present context the prior distribution (i.e. the distribution of process average) is the<br />

expected distribution of lot quality vector on which the <strong>sampling</strong> plan is going to operate.<br />

For the multiattribute Bayesian <strong>plans</strong> considered by others [See chapter 2.1], the process<br />

average for each attribute has been assumed to follow a beta distribution so that the lot<br />

quality distribution for each attribute becomes a beta binomial.Thus, in a situation when<br />

defect occurrences are jointly independent the product of individual beta distributions are<br />

chosen as an appropriate prior.<br />

We may, however, note that even when the process is in control with respect to such a<br />

prior, the process will occasionally go out of control and some lots of poorer quality will be<br />

produced before the process gets corrected. We then have a situation of a beta prior with<br />

outliers.<br />

As an alternative to these models, consider the process average vector as a random variable<br />

which may take on two values,(p 1 , p 2 , ..., p r ) and (p ′ 1, p ′ 2, ..., p ′ r), a satisfactory and an<br />

unsatisfactory quality level with given probabilities. This two point prior may be considered<br />

as a simplification of the one point prior with outliers, because the model contains some<br />

information about the distribution of the outlier. When the process performs at an unsatisfactory<br />

level it generally happens (e.g. for a manufacturing operation) that the quality level<br />

is poor for all the attributes. We cite one example from a real life situation.<br />

2.2.2 A real life example<br />

The example given below constitutes a typical example picked up from the author’s list<br />

of similar applications in factories rendered by him as a QC professional. For the general<br />

discussion intended here, the details relating to the particular application are not included<br />

and only the relevant calculations are presented.<br />

A company manufactures about 1.5 lakhs of 25 mm RS closures in a shift. A shift’s<br />

production by a group is being packed in cartons, each carton is considered as an inspection<br />

lot for verification after the end of the shift. The two important sets of attributes for the<br />

product are functional defects and surface defects. On the spot observations have been made<br />

using a p-chart data format on these attributes.<br />

In a typical scenario one observes, that most of the time the process is stable at a certain<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!