COMMITTEE REPORT PROFORMA - London Borough of Hillingdon

More documents

Recommendations

Info

character and visual amenities of the area, contrary to policies BE13 and BE19 of the Borough’s Adopted Unitary Development Plan. 5. That a period of 2 months be given for compliance with the terms of the Enforcement Notice. 8. NEW APPEALS AND APPEALS DECISIONS RESOLVED - That the New Appeals and Appeals decisions received between 1 January and 28 February 2003 be noted. 9. DECISION TAKEN BY OFFICERS UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY RESOLVED -That the decisions taken by officers under delegated authority for the period 1 January to 31 January 2003 be noted. 10. S106/278 PLANNING AGREEMENTS – QUARTERLY FINANCIAL MONITORING REPORT RESOLVED – That the S106/278 Planning Agreements – Quarterly Financial Monitoring report be noted. 11. BROOKSIDE, MOOR LANE, HARMONDSWORTH – UNAUTHORISED COMMERCIAL USE (58546/APP/98/2307 & EN/00/3 Councillor Dalip Chand and Councillor Margaret Grant declared personal and non-prejudicial interests in this application and took part in the discussion. The report was considered in Part 2 because information relating to the report that was to be reported to the meeting constituted exempt information as defined in the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985. The Committee had received information, which if disclosed to the public, would reveal that the Authority proposes; (a) to give under any enactment a notice under or by virtue of which requirements are imposed on a person; or (b) to make an order or direction under any enactment. RESOLVED – That the application be deferred until the next Hayes and Harlington Planning Committee to enable officers to seek further legal advice. The meeting closed at 9:25 p.m. Hayes Planning Committee – 1 May 2003 Page 16 PART 1 - MEMBERS, PUBLIC AND PRESS
PLANNING COMMITTEE – 1 MAY 2003 (HAYES & HARLINGTON) REPORT OF THE HEAD OF PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION Item No. 1 Address: Development: LBH Ref Nos: Report of the Head of Planning and Transportation LAND AT LANGWORTH DRIVE, HAYES Increase in height of existing perimeter fences and walls, alterations to existing entrance to accommodate new vehicular and pedestrian sliding gates. 2084/APP/2002/3027 A Drawing Nos: Drawing Nos. D/02/1/2073-1; D/02/1/2073-2 & D/02/1/2073-3 Date of receipt: 14/2/03 Date(s) of Amendment(s): 14/3/03 (1) SUMMARY This application by Housing Services seeks to improve security at the existing Langworth Drive sheltered housing complex through improvements to the boundary fencing. This has been in response to incidents of criminal activity and anti-social behaviour at the complex, in addition to preventing the use of Langworth Drive as an informal pedestrian thoroughfare. It is also anticipated that the proposed access gate will prevent parking problems caused by persons using Langworth Drive as free parking for adjacent Uxbridge Road businesses. The proposed works include the erection of a powder coated, galvanised fence with electrically operated gates along the front boundary, in addition to increasing existing fence heights along strategic portions of the remaining boundaries by the addition of railings, timber trellis or plastic coated chain mesh to existing closeboard and brick fences. It is considered that the proposed development works are acceptable. The design, siting and height of the proposed fencing is not considered to significantly affect the amenity of neighbouring occupiers or the street scene in general. Planning permission is recommended. (2) RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL - subject to the following conditions:- 1. (T1) Time limit 1. (T1) Standard 2. (TL1) Existing Trees - Survey (TL1) Standard (TL2) Trees to be Retained 3. (TL2) Standard 4. (TL3) Protection of Trees & 4. (TL3) Standard Hayes Planning Committee – 1 May 2003 Page 17 PART 1 - MEMBERS, PUBLIC AND PRESS
Page 1 and 2: AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT Meeting: H
Page 3 and 4: HAYES & HARLINGTON PLANNING COMMITT
Page 5 and 6: 13. Hyde House Newhaven Close Hayes
Page 7 and 8: HAYES AND HARLINGTON PLANNING COMMI
Page 9 and 10: REASON - To ensure that the premise
Page 11 and 12: 7. OTHER DECISIONS Decisions on the
Page 13 and 14: design principles A3, A4 and B3 of
Page 15: (iii) remove from the land all resu
Page 19 and 20: Approximately midway along the fron
Page 21 and 22: (i) Justification of the need for s
Page 23 and 24: (3)(g) Comments on Public Consultat
Page 25 and 26: B Item No. 2 Address: Development:
Page 27 and 28: Hayes Planning Committee - 1 May 20
Page 29 and 30: (full applications where details ar
Page 31 and 32: Part One Policies: Pt1.10 Seeks to
Page 33 and 34: ungalow has also reduced from 8.3 m
Page 35 and 36: (4) CONCLUSION It is considered tha
Page 37 and 38: A Item No. 4 Address: Development:
Page 39 and 40: 4. (MCD11) Storage in defined area
Page 41 and 42: (3)(c) Planning History Planning Ap
Page 43 and 44: (3)(e) Consultations The applicatio
Page 45 and 46: northern side of Clayton Road, and
Page 47 and 48: the site for a hotel and the potent
Page 49 and 50: Despite such attributes, it is ackn
Page 51 and 52: Item No. 5 Address: Report of the H
Page 53 and 54: BE15 Proposals for alterations and
Page 55 and 56: The extension is sufficiently far f
Page 57 and 58: Hayes Planning Committee - 1 May 20
Page 59 and 60: Observations of the Borough Solicit
Page 61 and 62: B Item No. 7 Address: Development:
Page 63 and 64: INFORMATIVES 1. (5) Access to Build
Page 65 and 66: Item No. 8 Address: Report of the H
Page 67 and 68:
The predominant scale of developmen
Page 69 and 70:
BE38 Retention of topographical and
Page 71 and 72:
Require 43 cycle spaces. For Block
Page 73 and 74:
(iii) Impact on the locally listed
Page 75 and 76:
trees, two of which are covered by
Page 77 and 78:
front building (Block A), combined
Page 79 and 80:
A Item No. 9 Address: Development:
Page 81 and 82:
contrary to Policy A4 of the Boroug
Page 83 and 84:
(3)(e) Main Planning Issues The mai
Page 85 and 86:
irrational factors or taken without
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
On the opposite side of Moor Lane i
Page 91 and 92:
The requirements of the notice are:
Page 93 and 94:
irrational factors or taken without
Page 95 and 96:
planning permission was to be sough
Page 97 and 98:
12.2.98 A meeting was held at the C
Page 99 and 100:
Hayes Planning Committee - 1 May 20
Page 101 and 102:
12-00-14.00 and 1700-2300 hours Sun
Page 103 and 104:
Comments: (i) (ii) (iii) The restri
Page 105 and 106:
Point (iii) no evidence of litter a
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Road. 363 is to be used for a seati
Page 111 and 112:
(3)(e) Consultations External Consu
Page 113 and 114:
However, the Environmental Protecti
Page 115 and 116:
(4) CONCLUSION The proposed change
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
ancillary to the nine flats and sha
Page 121 and 122:
flats are provided with an area of
Page 123 and 124:
(3)(f) Main Planning Issues The mai
Page 125 and 126:
All areas of open space are conside
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Observations of Borough Solicitor:
Page 131 and 132:
B Item No. 15 Address: Development:
Page 133 and 134:
Reference Documents: (a) (b) (c) UD
Page 135 and 136:
Item No. 16 Address: Report of the
Page 137 and 138:
4. (7) Building Regulations 5. (31)
Page 139 and 140:
Item No. 17 Address: Report of the
Page 141 and 142:
the elevations facing No.2 and 6 Ha
Page 143 and 144:
INFORMATIVES 1. You are advised thi
Page 145 and 146:
B Item No.18 Address: Development:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Observations of Borough Solicitor W
Page 151 and 152:
Item No. 20 Address: Development: L
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
DEVELOPMENT CONTROL CONTACT OFFICER
Page 157:
Title Date Publisher 30 Planning Br
show all

COMMITTEE REPORT PROFORMA - London Borough of Hillingdon

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?