COMMITTEE REPORT PROFORMA - London Borough of Hillingdon

More documents

Recommendations

Info

(vi) (vii) (viii) The proposal is contrary to the deeds. The proposal will affect existing rights to light. The applicant is not a resident of the neighbourhood. Mr John McDonnell MP Concerned about the number and frequency of planning applications that are being submitted to develop this plot of land that is just not suitable for any type of development. Opposed to the development on the grounds of loss of amenity to his constituents. Internal Consultees Traffic Engineer No objection (3)(f) Main Planning Issues The main issues in this case are considered to be whether the proposal: - (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) Is in keeping with the character of the area Provides a satisfactory form of accommodation Detracts from the amenities of adjoining residents Provides adequate parking, turning and access (i) Is in keeping with the character of the area The character and appearance of the surrounding streets comprises predominantly of the spacing of moderately proportioned semi-detached houses on large plots. These houses are set back from the road frontage and this accentuates the degree of spaciousness. The part of the application site where the bungalows are proposed to be located is situated in between the rear gardens of properties on Keith Road, Albert Road and North Hyde Road. Whilst the site is not visible from the street scene, it is clearly visible from surrounding properties. Under the previous outline consent, it was established that the site is capable of accommodating two detached chalet bungalows. However, siting design and external appearance were reserved for future consideration. No details in respect of these matters have been submitted. The plans submitted in respect of this current full planning application indicate two chalet bungalows, which face towards the properties on Keith Road. When compared to the previous refused scheme, the overall floor area of chalet bungalow been reduced from 153m 2 to the 130m 2 . The width of the chalet Hayes Planning Committee – 1 May 2003 Page 32 PART 1 - MEMBERS, PUBLIC AND PRESS
ungalow has also reduced from 8.3 metres to 7.4 metres. However, the height of the dwelling unit has increased by 0.2 metres to 7.2 metres. The average height of a house is approximately 8 metres. It is considered that the height of both properties has been kept to a minimum and that the reduced size and bulk of the development now proposed results in chalet bungalows that are no longer incongruous, visually intrusive or overdominant, to the detriment of the character and appearance of the surrounding area. The dormer windows to both properties have been reduced in size and bulk and are now sited 1.1 metres below the ridge of the roof. The dormers are now considered to be subordinate to the proposed roof slopes and therefore no longer detract from the visual amenities of the surrounding area. (ii) Provides a satisfactory form of accommodation The amenity space for plots 1 and 2 is over the 60m 2 recommended in this Council’s Design Guide ‘Residential Layouts and House Design’. The proposal therefore provides a satisfactory environment for future occupiers. (iii) Detracts from the amenities of adjoining residents The Council’s Supplementary Planning Guidance ‘Residential Layouts and House Design states that where a building of two or more stories abuts a residential curtilage adequate distance should be maintained to avoid overdominance of the property and its garden. This distance is dependent on the extent and bulk of the buildings but it is generally considered that this should not be less than 15 metres. The Design Guide also requires that a minimum of 21 metres is provided between habitable room windows in order to avoid overlooking. The plans indicate that the proposed chalet bungalows are situated some 26 metres from the properties on Keith Road. The proposal is not therefore considered to detract from the amenities of nearby residents by reason of overdominance or loss of privacy. Five garages currently occupy the site and will be demolished; the three parking spaces proposed will not materially detract from the amenities of nearby residents by reason of noise and disturbance. (iv) Provides adequate parking, turning and access facilities According to this Council’s adopted car parking standards, a maximum of two spaces are required per dwelling unit. The plans indicate three spaces within the application site and this is considered to be sufficient to ensure that the proposal will not give rise to additional on street parking on Keith Road. This Council’s Supplementary Planning Guidance “Roads in Residential Layouts” seeks to create safe and convenient road conditions for vehicular and pedestrian Hayes Planning Committee – 1 May 2003 Page 33 PART 1 - MEMBERS, PUBLIC AND PRESS
Page 1 and 2: AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT Meeting: H
Page 3 and 4: HAYES & HARLINGTON PLANNING COMMITT
Page 5 and 6: 13. Hyde House Newhaven Close Hayes
Page 7 and 8: HAYES AND HARLINGTON PLANNING COMMI
Page 9 and 10: REASON - To ensure that the premise
Page 11 and 12: 7. OTHER DECISIONS Decisions on the
Page 13 and 14: design principles A3, A4 and B3 of
Page 15 and 16: (iii) remove from the land all resu
Page 17 and 18: PLANNING COMMITTEE - 1 MAY 2003 (HA
Page 19 and 20: Approximately midway along the fron
Page 21 and 22: (i) Justification of the need for s
Page 23 and 24: (3)(g) Comments on Public Consultat
Page 25 and 26: B Item No. 2 Address: Development:
Page 27 and 28: Hayes Planning Committee - 1 May 20
Page 29 and 30: (full applications where details ar
Page 31: Part One Policies: Pt1.10 Seeks to
Page 35 and 36: (4) CONCLUSION It is considered tha
Page 37 and 38: A Item No. 4 Address: Development:
Page 39 and 40: 4. (MCD11) Storage in defined area
Page 41 and 42: (3)(c) Planning History Planning Ap
Page 43 and 44: (3)(e) Consultations The applicatio
Page 45 and 46: northern side of Clayton Road, and
Page 47 and 48: the site for a hotel and the potent
Page 49 and 50: Despite such attributes, it is ackn
Page 51 and 52: Item No. 5 Address: Report of the H
Page 53 and 54: BE15 Proposals for alterations and
Page 55 and 56: The extension is sufficiently far f
Page 57 and 58: Hayes Planning Committee - 1 May 20
Page 59 and 60: Observations of the Borough Solicit
Page 61 and 62: B Item No. 7 Address: Development:
Page 63 and 64: INFORMATIVES 1. (5) Access to Build
Page 65 and 66: Item No. 8 Address: Report of the H
Page 67 and 68: The predominant scale of developmen
Page 69 and 70: BE38 Retention of topographical and
Page 71 and 72: Require 43 cycle spaces. For Block
Page 73 and 74: (iii) Impact on the locally listed
Page 75 and 76: trees, two of which are covered by
Page 77 and 78: front building (Block A), combined
Page 79 and 80: A Item No. 9 Address: Development:
Page 81 and 82: contrary to Policy A4 of the Boroug
Page 83 and 84:
(3)(e) Main Planning Issues The mai
Page 85 and 86:
irrational factors or taken without
Page 87 and 88:
A Item No. 10 Address: Development:
Page 89 and 90:
On the opposite side of Moor Lane i
Page 91 and 92:
The requirements of the notice are:
Page 93 and 94:
irrational factors or taken without
Page 95 and 96:
planning permission was to be sough
Page 97 and 98:
12.2.98 A meeting was held at the C
Page 99 and 100:
Hayes Planning Committee - 1 May 20
Page 101 and 102:
12-00-14.00 and 1700-2300 hours Sun
Page 103 and 104:
Comments: (i) (ii) (iii) The restri
Page 105 and 106:
Point (iii) no evidence of litter a
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Road. 363 is to be used for a seati
Page 111 and 112:
(3)(e) Consultations External Consu
Page 113 and 114:
However, the Environmental Protecti
Page 115 and 116:
(4) CONCLUSION The proposed change
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
ancillary to the nine flats and sha
Page 121 and 122:
flats are provided with an area of
Page 123 and 124:
(3)(f) Main Planning Issues The mai
Page 125 and 126:
All areas of open space are conside
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Observations of Borough Solicitor:
Page 131 and 132:
B Item No. 15 Address: Development:
Page 133 and 134:
Reference Documents: (a) (b) (c) UD
Page 135 and 136:
Item No. 16 Address: Report of the
Page 137 and 138:
4. (7) Building Regulations 5. (31)
Page 139 and 140:
Item No. 17 Address: Report of the
Page 141 and 142:
the elevations facing No.2 and 6 Ha
Page 143 and 144:
INFORMATIVES 1. You are advised thi
Page 145 and 146:
B Item No.18 Address: Development:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Observations of Borough Solicitor W
Page 151 and 152:
Item No. 20 Address: Development: L
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
DEVELOPMENT CONTROL CONTACT OFFICER
Page 157:
Title Date Publisher 30 Planning Br
show all

COMMITTEE REPORT PROFORMA - London Borough of Hillingdon

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?