05.08.2014 Views

B - St. Cloud State University

B - St. Cloud State University

B - St. Cloud State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ryan’s MFP-3D Procedural Operation ‘Manualette’ Version 10 (v080501; Igor 6.04A); 11.14<br />

A<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

1 nm relative trigger<br />

B 14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

15 nm relative trigger<br />

0.0<br />

8<br />

nm<br />

-0.5<br />

-1.0<br />

nm<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

-1.5<br />

0<br />

-50<br />

nm<br />

-100<br />

-150<br />

Figure 11.2.7.4: Two examples of low force relative Deflection triggers: A) a ~1 nm relative trigger- notice contact regime<br />

of force curve is minimal- best used for functionalized tips in which some sort of dissociation event is being measured; B)<br />

increasing the relative trigger to a few nm’s worth of deflection. Note there is some weird adhesion to the surface.<br />

• With a calibrated spring constant, choosing force as the trigger parameters allows forces to be dialed<br />

in, which is generally more intuitive than using cantilever deflections.<br />

SURFACE CHARGE CAN ALSO AFFECT FORCE CURVE AQUISTION-<br />

Occasionally, the substrate chosen can be subject to surface charges, causing some crazy nonlinear<br />

deflections in the free air and near point of contact when using very low spring constant<br />

cantilevers. The author has found this to be true of 0.03 N/m (and below) levers using clean glass,<br />

or mica glued to a glass slide. Glass is notorious for having a surface charge. Figure 11.2.7.5A<br />

shows an example of surface charging affecting the force distance curve: notice the non-linearity in the<br />

approach and retract parts of the curve, caused by the long range forces of the surface charge pulling the tip<br />

towards the surface, or an inherently deep water layer. Either way, it’s tough to get a proper virtual deflection<br />

curve fit. To solve this, it’s a good idea to have an atomically flat material that doesn’t possess strong surface<br />

charge- Figure 11.2.7.5B shows a piece of graphite adhered to a magnetic sample puck on an AR magnetic<br />

puck holder, along with the <strong>St</strong>atic Masters to help dissipate charges. All this said, sometimes you can’t get rid<br />

of the charge. Good luck-<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

0<br />

-50<br />

nm<br />

-100<br />

-150<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Figure 11.2.7.5: Surface charge can affect cantilever deflection in force-distance curves: A) attractive forces pulling<br />

cantilever towards surface in approach; B) Eliminating charge by removing any glass components in sample mounting.<br />

Here, the sample (graphite) is fixed to sample puck via silver paint, and placed on an AR magnetic sample holder, and<br />

the use of a <strong>St</strong>atic Master.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!