08.09.2014 Views

A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism

A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism

A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10<br />

The structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>predation</strong> is considered first. Suppose that there are x prey <strong>and</strong><br />

y predator individuals per unit area, <strong>and</strong> that each individual predator consumes, on<br />

the average, f(x) prey individuals per unit time. For the moment, the analytic <strong>for</strong>m<br />

<strong>of</strong> f(x) is not specified, but it is an assumed, increasing function <strong>of</strong> x.<br />

It is also<br />

assumed <strong>for</strong> the moment that the prey <strong>and</strong> predator numbers are fixed at X <strong>and</strong> Y<br />

respectively throughout one observation period t, i.e. that during t the prey population<br />

is replenished as fast as it is reduced by <strong>predation</strong>, <strong>and</strong> no increase or decrease<br />

occurs among the predators. Under these assumptions, the following will hold :<br />

n-~f(X) Yt (3.1)<br />

where n is the total number <strong>of</strong> prey killed by predators per unit area during t.<br />

capital letters <strong>for</strong> x <strong>and</strong> y indicate that these values are fixed during an observation<br />

period t.) At this stage, neither the effect <strong>of</strong> changes in the predator's psycho-physio-<br />

logical state nor the effect <strong>of</strong> social interaction is considered.<br />

(The<br />

Equation (3.1) is shown graphically in Fig. 1 where hypothetical values <strong>of</strong> n are<br />

plotted against X; note that Y <strong>and</strong> t are both fixed <strong>for</strong> all X's. The evaluation <strong>of</strong> n is<br />

nl when X is X~ <strong>and</strong> n2 when X is Xz. Of course, the measurements <strong>of</strong> n~ <strong>and</strong> n~<br />

must be made in two separate observations to meet the condition under which eq.<br />

(3.1) holds. It should also be noticed that eq. (3.1) does not provide any means <strong>of</strong><br />

evaluating the effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>predation</strong> upon the prey density because the latter is fixed in<br />

each observation period.<br />

rl<br />

n~<br />

N<br />

y<br />

X2<br />

Fig. 1. A hypothetical example <strong>of</strong> curves <strong>for</strong> eq. (3. 1) The prey density,<br />

fixed at X during time-interval t, is plotted on the horizontal axis,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the total number (n) preyed upon <strong>for</strong> t, when the predator density<br />

y is fixed at Y, is plotted on the vertical axis.<br />

Now, suppose a new situation in which the prey population is not replenished so<br />

that the prey density is gradually depleted while the predators are hunting in one<br />

observation period, i.e.t.<br />

Xl<br />

As the prey density decreases during the period, the number<br />

that the predators can kill per unit time per unit area must also decrease. This<br />

>•

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!