CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED The California Surveyor ... - CLSA
CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED The California Surveyor ... - CLSA
CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED The California Surveyor ... - CLSA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In spite of being extra careful and following all the good risk management<br />
practices we’ve been discussing the last couple of<br />
years, bad things can happen to good surveyors. Things like<br />
boundary errors, buildings in the wrong places, bad plans, weak<br />
contracts and payment disputes can result in claims that are<br />
incredibly complex and difficult and require massive amounts of<br />
documentation. If you see a claim coming, call your broker for<br />
advice and use the free lawyer consultation feature of your policy.<br />
Don’t wait until the potential claim gets cold. Here are some recent<br />
professional liability claims that Zurich has paid on behalf of land<br />
surveyors:<br />
Loss 1 - Building in the wrong place<br />
A surveying company staked out a new building for a shopping<br />
center. After construction began, it was discovered the building<br />
was 30 feet west of where it should have been. <strong>The</strong> error<br />
resulted in loss of parking spaces for an office supply store. <strong>The</strong><br />
partially completed building was demolished and moved to the<br />
proper location. <strong>The</strong> project owner filed a claim of $656,000 for<br />
project delay and extra work.<br />
<strong>The</strong> surveyor accepted responsibility for miscalculation but<br />
said the architect’s drawings were incomplete and misleading<br />
By: Richard Hertzberg, CPCU, ARM, Vista International Insurance Brokers<br />
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR LAND SURVEYORS<br />
Whoops, Something Happened!<br />
because they only contained two, not three,<br />
fixed reference points. <strong>The</strong> architect said the<br />
third point had been given to the surveyor<br />
by phone. <strong>The</strong> surveyor failed to document<br />
the new information. <strong>Surveyor</strong>’s counsel<br />
said the architect should have provided drawings with three reference<br />
points so the building could have been properly placed. It<br />
was argued that a prudent surveyor would not have staked out a<br />
building without a third fixed point so the surveyor did not meet<br />
the required standard of care. After negotiations, the claim was<br />
settled for $350,000 in indemnity and $25,000 in defense costs.<br />
Loss 2 - Church sanctuary too close to another building<br />
A surveyor was hired by a general contractor for construction<br />
staking on a design/build church project. During construction the<br />
GC found a 12-foot difference between the construction drawings<br />
and the staking that put the church sanctuary 12 feet too close to<br />
an existing building. Holes for 50 piers had been drilled and 49<br />
had to be redone at a cost of $100,000. Since the surveyor was at<br />
fault, the insurance company tried to settle the loss for $75,000<br />
but had to pay the $100,000.<br />
Loss 3 - School building off by 30 feet<br />
A contractor was sued for $350,000 by a school district<br />
because a change that should have been made by the surveyor<br />
resulted in a 30-foot misplacement of a school building. <strong>The</strong> architect’s<br />
plans did not identify the building’s point of origin and the<br />
surveyor notified the architect of the error, which was corrected by<br />
an addendum. However, a subsequent addendum moved the<br />
point of origin by 30 feet and the surveyor was unaware of this<br />
change.<br />
<strong>The</strong> surveyor was found liable for not identifying the change<br />
even though he argued the new change was not clearly marked<br />
and the architect did not directly inform him of the change. An<br />
adjacent road had to be moved and additional property for a rightof-way<br />
had to be purchased. <strong>The</strong> school district sued the contractor<br />
and the contractor sued the surveyor claiming that the surveyor<br />
failed to follow contract documents. In mediation, the case<br />
was settled for $230,000 with $80,000 paid in defense costs.<br />
Check, check and check again<br />
Please remember to always carefully review drawings and<br />
documents and if anything seems wrong or out of place talk to the<br />
owner, contractor or architect. Document these conversations<br />
carefully. Also, if you are ever involved in a frivolous lawsuit or a<br />
claim against a contractor where you did the survey work and<br />
were therefore included because your name was on the contract,<br />
remember that you still have to be defended and need a lawyer to<br />
get you out of the suit.<br />
In other land surveyor losses Zurich has settled claims for<br />
stolen and damaged property and equipment, business interruption<br />
losses, general liability, workers compensation and wrongful<br />
termination accusations. Your insurance pays claims to help keep<br />
you in business, in the black and in good graces when the unexpected<br />
and unforeseen happens. ❖<br />
48<br />
www.californiasurveyors.org