13.09.2014 Views

CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED The California Surveyor ... - CLSA

CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED The California Surveyor ... - CLSA

CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED The California Surveyor ... - CLSA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In spite of being extra careful and following all the good risk management<br />

practices we’ve been discussing the last couple of<br />

years, bad things can happen to good surveyors. Things like<br />

boundary errors, buildings in the wrong places, bad plans, weak<br />

contracts and payment disputes can result in claims that are<br />

incredibly complex and difficult and require massive amounts of<br />

documentation. If you see a claim coming, call your broker for<br />

advice and use the free lawyer consultation feature of your policy.<br />

Don’t wait until the potential claim gets cold. Here are some recent<br />

professional liability claims that Zurich has paid on behalf of land<br />

surveyors:<br />

Loss 1 - Building in the wrong place<br />

A surveying company staked out a new building for a shopping<br />

center. After construction began, it was discovered the building<br />

was 30 feet west of where it should have been. <strong>The</strong> error<br />

resulted in loss of parking spaces for an office supply store. <strong>The</strong><br />

partially completed building was demolished and moved to the<br />

proper location. <strong>The</strong> project owner filed a claim of $656,000 for<br />

project delay and extra work.<br />

<strong>The</strong> surveyor accepted responsibility for miscalculation but<br />

said the architect’s drawings were incomplete and misleading<br />

By: Richard Hertzberg, CPCU, ARM, Vista International Insurance Brokers<br />

RISK MANAGEMENT FOR LAND SURVEYORS<br />

Whoops, Something Happened!<br />

because they only contained two, not three,<br />

fixed reference points. <strong>The</strong> architect said the<br />

third point had been given to the surveyor<br />

by phone. <strong>The</strong> surveyor failed to document<br />

the new information. <strong>Surveyor</strong>’s counsel<br />

said the architect should have provided drawings with three reference<br />

points so the building could have been properly placed. It<br />

was argued that a prudent surveyor would not have staked out a<br />

building without a third fixed point so the surveyor did not meet<br />

the required standard of care. After negotiations, the claim was<br />

settled for $350,000 in indemnity and $25,000 in defense costs.<br />

Loss 2 - Church sanctuary too close to another building<br />

A surveyor was hired by a general contractor for construction<br />

staking on a design/build church project. During construction the<br />

GC found a 12-foot difference between the construction drawings<br />

and the staking that put the church sanctuary 12 feet too close to<br />

an existing building. Holes for 50 piers had been drilled and 49<br />

had to be redone at a cost of $100,000. Since the surveyor was at<br />

fault, the insurance company tried to settle the loss for $75,000<br />

but had to pay the $100,000.<br />

Loss 3 - School building off by 30 feet<br />

A contractor was sued for $350,000 by a school district<br />

because a change that should have been made by the surveyor<br />

resulted in a 30-foot misplacement of a school building. <strong>The</strong> architect’s<br />

plans did not identify the building’s point of origin and the<br />

surveyor notified the architect of the error, which was corrected by<br />

an addendum. However, a subsequent addendum moved the<br />

point of origin by 30 feet and the surveyor was unaware of this<br />

change.<br />

<strong>The</strong> surveyor was found liable for not identifying the change<br />

even though he argued the new change was not clearly marked<br />

and the architect did not directly inform him of the change. An<br />

adjacent road had to be moved and additional property for a rightof-way<br />

had to be purchased. <strong>The</strong> school district sued the contractor<br />

and the contractor sued the surveyor claiming that the surveyor<br />

failed to follow contract documents. In mediation, the case<br />

was settled for $230,000 with $80,000 paid in defense costs.<br />

Check, check and check again<br />

Please remember to always carefully review drawings and<br />

documents and if anything seems wrong or out of place talk to the<br />

owner, contractor or architect. Document these conversations<br />

carefully. Also, if you are ever involved in a frivolous lawsuit or a<br />

claim against a contractor where you did the survey work and<br />

were therefore included because your name was on the contract,<br />

remember that you still have to be defended and need a lawyer to<br />

get you out of the suit.<br />

In other land surveyor losses Zurich has settled claims for<br />

stolen and damaged property and equipment, business interruption<br />

losses, general liability, workers compensation and wrongful<br />

termination accusations. Your insurance pays claims to help keep<br />

you in business, in the black and in good graces when the unexpected<br />

and unforeseen happens. ❖<br />

48<br />

www.californiasurveyors.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!