51st Annual Meeting & ToxExpo - Society of Toxicology
51st Annual Meeting & ToxExpo - Society of Toxicology
51st Annual Meeting & ToxExpo - Society of Toxicology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
51 st <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> and <strong>ToxExpo</strong><br />
Continuing Education<br />
Courses may also instruct attendees on regulatory requirements<br />
for safety assessment <strong>of</strong> drugs and metabolites or novel approaches<br />
for assessing pharmacodynamic effects. Course proposals under<br />
the “Drug Metabolism” target area are expected to be in-depth and<br />
focused on a central theme. As therfore, multiple proposals addressing<br />
different aspects <strong>of</strong> this general theme are encouraged to ensure<br />
adequate coverage <strong>of</strong> this rapidly advancing and important field.<br />
Noncoding RNAs and Their Role in Biology and<br />
<strong>Toxicology</strong><br />
Small, medium, and long noncoding RNAs have been identified<br />
in many species, including humans. Their functions are still not<br />
fully understood, but they are becoming increasingly recognized as<br />
important factors in physiology, xenobiotic sensitivity, and disease.<br />
For example, microRNAs (miRs) are small noncoding RNAs that<br />
regulate gene expression primarily through base-pair interactions<br />
with 3'-untranslated regions <strong>of</strong> target genes and this results in altered<br />
gene expression. It is estimated that miRs regulate up to 30% <strong>of</strong> all<br />
genes in humans: In contrast, larger intergenic noncoding RNAs<br />
(lincRs) such as HOTAIR regulate chromatin structure through<br />
epigenetic pathways. The number and function <strong>of</strong> noncoding RNAs<br />
being discovered is continually increasing. It is certain that they<br />
will play an important role in toxicology and pharmacology. The<br />
CE committee is interested in receiving proposals that will provide<br />
in-depth instruction on noncoding RNAs, including what they are<br />
and how they function, their effects on xenobiotic sensitivity and<br />
disposition, their importance in disease risks and phenotypes, and<br />
their relevance to toxicological research, including human environment<br />
responses, heritable environmentally-induced changes, and the<br />
integration <strong>of</strong> their novel characteristics into studies <strong>of</strong> xenobiotic<br />
mechanisms and the drug development/safety assessment processes.<br />
Proposals highlighting vital roles <strong>of</strong> noncoding RNAs in human<br />
diseases, particularly environmentally influenced diseases, and the<br />
significance <strong>of</strong> physiological changes due to noncoding RNAs in the<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> conditions are also <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />
2012 Continuing Education Courses<br />
Alternative In Vitro <strong>Toxicology</strong> Testing<br />
for the 21st Century<br />
SR01<br />
CE Basic<br />
Chairperson(s): Stephen H. Safe, Texas A&M University, College<br />
Station, TX.<br />
Endorsed by:<br />
Risk Assessment Specialty Section<br />
Over the last two decades, alternatives to animal testing were strongly<br />
driven by animal welfare considerations. A culture <strong>of</strong> organotypic<br />
cell models, quality assurance, and validation developed, which<br />
resulted in a number <strong>of</strong> novel approaches for regulatory testing.<br />
Progress to replace especially the systemic and chronic types <strong>of</strong><br />
tests has been limited. Novel programs to assess large numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
substances such as existing chemicals (REACH and the emerging<br />
TSCA reauthorization), nanoparticles, or mixtures, as well as new<br />
products such as biologicals and cell therapies now add to the need<br />
to move to another approach for toxicity testing. Additionally,<br />
interest in health effects like endocrine disruption, developmental<br />
neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, obesity, atherosclerosis, or childhood<br />
asthma require extensive and new types <strong>of</strong> testing. This is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
referred to as Toxicity Testing for the 21st Century (Tox-21c), after<br />
the respective NAS vision document from 2007, which was made<br />
US EPA’s toxicity testing strategy in 2009. The central change is<br />
moving from apical “black box” animal models to mechanism or<br />
pathway <strong>of</strong> toxicity (PoT). The biotechnology and bioinformatics<br />
revolution <strong>of</strong> recent years has made it possible to develop systems<br />
biology, here systems toxicology, approaches. The experiences from<br />
the field <strong>of</strong> alternative methods now prove to be the most important<br />
to implement a new regulatory approach. Standardization and<br />
validation <strong>of</strong> cell cultures is crucial for PoT identification as well as<br />
the implementation <strong>of</strong> high-throughput types <strong>of</strong> tests based on PoT.<br />
The first projects to systematically map the entirety <strong>of</strong> human PoT,<br />
the Human Toxome, have started. The validation <strong>of</strong> these novel tests<br />
represents an enormous challenge. It is proposed to follow the role<br />
model <strong>of</strong> evidence-based medicine. For this purpose, the evidencebased<br />
toxicology collaboration was started at SOT 2011 and is<br />
currently shaping its procedures and governance.<br />
• Alternative In Vitro <strong>Toxicology</strong> Testing for the 21st Century.<br />
Thomas A. Hartung, John Hopkins University Center for<br />
Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Baltimore, MD.<br />
CE<br />
up-to-date information at www.toxicology.org 53<br />
CE Target Area