02.10.2014 Views

The hardest thing we have ever done - Palliative Care Australia

The hardest thing we have ever done - Palliative Care Australia

The hardest thing we have ever done - Palliative Care Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Impact on Economic Wellbeing<br />

It appears that the primary caring role does reduce a person’s chances of being employed<br />

(ABS, 1999). <strong>The</strong> proportion of primary carers who <strong>we</strong>re neither working nor looking for work<br />

was almost double that of those who <strong>we</strong>re not in the caring role (Table 1). Age and sex<br />

alone do not explain the lo<strong>we</strong>r employment rate for primary carers; although most carers are<br />

women bet<strong>we</strong>en the ages 15 to 64, their employment rate is still lo<strong>we</strong>r than that of all<br />

women in the same age group (46% compared to 61%). Schofield et al (1997a) reported<br />

that caring commitments meant that some carers <strong>we</strong>re unable to work, or had to work fe<strong>we</strong>r<br />

hours or in a lo<strong>we</strong>r paid job with financial consequences (Table 7).<br />

Table 7: Effect of caring on the employment and financial status of carers<br />

Details of changes<br />

Worried about care recipient<br />

while at work<br />

Working fe<strong>we</strong>r hours<br />

Had to give up their job<br />

Having less energy for work<br />

Being interrupted repeatedly<br />

during working hours<br />

Taking periods of unpaid leave<br />

Settling for a less responsible job<br />

Refusing promotion<br />

Working from home<br />

Difficulty meeting <strong>ever</strong>yday living costs<br />

Financial loss due to extra expenses<br />

Reduction in income<br />

Time spent caring per <strong>we</strong>ek<br />

Percent<br />

59<br />

29<br />

17<br />

29<br />

28<br />

22<br />

16<br />

13<br />

14<br />

25<br />

26<br />

18<br />

27% for over 100hrs; 15% for<br />

31-100hrs; 22% for 10-30hrs; 35%<br />

for under 10hrs.<br />

Source: Information compiled from Schofield et al (1997a). n=976.<br />

Totals do not add up to 100% due to multiple responses.<br />

<strong>The</strong> limited employment opportunities for primary carers are also reflected in their incomes,<br />

with over half reporting a government pension or allowance as their principal source of<br />

income (Table 1). <strong>The</strong> ‘Caring Costs’ study also confirmed the low-income levels of most<br />

carers (<strong>Care</strong>rs Association of <strong>Australia</strong>, 1997). Almost two-thirds listed a government pension<br />

or benefit as a main source of income. More than half of all carers had incomes less than<br />

$200 per <strong>we</strong>ek, and over two thirds had incomes less than $300 per <strong>we</strong>ek, when average<br />

<strong>we</strong>ekly full-time earnings at the time <strong>we</strong>re approximately $550. Similarly, nearly 60% of all<br />

carers had too little taxable income to pay personal income tax, and over two thirds paid less<br />

than $20 a <strong>we</strong>ek income tax. Only 15% of carers listed paid work as a main source<br />

of income.<br />

20 THE HARDEST THING WE HAVE EVER DONE: <strong>The</strong> Social Impact of Caring for Terminally Ill People in <strong>Australia</strong>, 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!