10.10.2014 Views

Multiscale Modeling of Theta ' Precipitation in Al-Cu Binary Alloys

Multiscale Modeling of Theta ' Precipitation in Al-Cu Binary Alloys

Multiscale Modeling of Theta ' Precipitation in Al-Cu Binary Alloys

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

V. Vaithyanathan et al. / Acta Materialia 52 (2004) 2973–2987 2985<br />

average aspect ratio<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

MF 225C(R)<br />

MF 250C(R)<br />

FP/PFM<br />

FP/PFM(avg)<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70<br />

time (hrs)<br />

Fig. 13. Average aspect ratio <strong>of</strong> h 0 precipitates from the <strong>Al</strong>–2%<strong>Cu</strong> alloy<br />

is compared with the experimental results <strong>of</strong> Merle and Fouquet [38].<br />

The <strong>in</strong>dividual aspect ratios from the simulation (FP/PFM) are displayed<br />

along with the average aspect ratio <strong>in</strong> solid l<strong>in</strong>e. The equilibrium<br />

aspect ratio from the simulation results is <strong>in</strong> good agreement with<br />

the late stage equilibrium value from the experiments.<br />

cence. <strong>Al</strong>so, the same <strong>in</strong>teraction resists coalescence<br />

between unlike variants (which would result <strong>in</strong> an antiphase<br />

doma<strong>in</strong> boundary or tw<strong>in</strong> boundary formation)<br />

and <strong>in</strong>hibits their growth, similar to the experimental<br />

observations [6,30].<br />

From our simulations <strong>of</strong> microstructural evolution<br />

(Fig. 10), we have extracted quantitative precipitate features<br />

like the thickness, length and aspect ratio as a<br />

function <strong>of</strong> time. The thicken<strong>in</strong>g and lengthen<strong>in</strong>g k<strong>in</strong>etics<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed from an <strong>Al</strong>–2%<strong>Cu</strong> alloy are shown <strong>in</strong> Figs. 11<br />

and 12. These multiscale model<strong>in</strong>g (FP/PFM – firstpr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />

phase-field model) k<strong>in</strong>etics are compared with<br />

experimental results available from the literature for<br />

precipitation temperatures between 200 and 250 °C. The<br />

average (solid l<strong>in</strong>e) and maximum (dotted l<strong>in</strong>e) values <strong>of</strong><br />

length and thickness from the simulation are compared<br />

with average values from experiments. It should be<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ted out that the experimental measurements selectively<br />

measure a few hundred precipitates from the large<br />

number <strong>of</strong> available precipitates. <strong>Al</strong>so, experimental<br />

images (<strong>in</strong> TEM) can <strong>in</strong>clude precipitate overlap, which<br />

can result both <strong>in</strong> an overestimation <strong>of</strong> the average length<br />

and also <strong>in</strong> difficulties <strong>in</strong> resolv<strong>in</strong>g thicknesses at the<br />

nanometer-scale, lead<strong>in</strong>g to large uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> these<br />

measurements. From Figs. 11 and 12, it is clear that the<br />

thickness values from our simulations are <strong>in</strong> closer<br />

agreement with experimental results than are the values<br />

<strong>of</strong> precipitate length. We assert that the source <strong>of</strong> the<br />

discrepancy <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> precipitate length is due to the<br />

pronounced <strong>in</strong>terfacial mobility anisotropy and therefore,<br />

the much longer non-equilibrium lengths <strong>in</strong> experimental<br />

measurements as compared to the equilibrium<br />

values predicted by the simulation. The average aspect<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> h 0 precipitates <strong>in</strong> the 2%<strong>Cu</strong> alloy predicted from<br />

our simulation (see Fig. 13) agrees well with the measurements<br />

<strong>of</strong> Merle and Fouquet [38], who obta<strong>in</strong>ed data<br />

after long ag<strong>in</strong>g times (a few hundred to a thousand<br />

hours). The maximum value <strong>of</strong> equilibrium aspect ratio<br />

from the model predictions does not exceed 30, whereas<br />

large non-equilibrium values are observed dur<strong>in</strong>g ag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

experiments, presumably <strong>in</strong>duced by the <strong>in</strong>terfacial mobility<br />

anisotropy.<br />

The multiscale model can also be used to study and<br />

compare the precipitation k<strong>in</strong>etics <strong>of</strong> alloys with different<br />

precipitate volume fractions. As an example, the<br />

precipitate morphology and aspect ratios are compared<br />

for three different alloy compositions, 2%, 3% and 4%<br />

<strong>Cu</strong>. The smallest composition studied (2%) is the closest<br />

to the <strong>Cu</strong> compositions <strong>in</strong> many b<strong>in</strong>ary and multicomponent<br />

<strong>Al</strong>–<strong>Cu</strong>-based alloys <strong>of</strong> practical <strong>in</strong>terest.<br />

<strong>Al</strong>though the higher volume fractions might be somewhat<br />

unrealistic, they are important, as they provide<br />

Fig. 14. Precipitate evolution as a function <strong>of</strong> dimensionless time for (a) <strong>Al</strong>–3%<strong>Cu</strong> and (b) <strong>Al</strong>–4%<strong>Cu</strong> alloy. t ¼ 900 corresponds to a real time <strong>of</strong> 10<br />

and 7.5 h for a 3% and 4% alloy, respectively, while for the 2% alloy <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10, it corresponds to 30 h.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!