CFOs: Surviving in a New Era - AGA
CFOs: Surviving in a New Era - AGA
CFOs: Surviving in a New Era - AGA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
25<br />
Table 7:<br />
Federal executives’ op<strong>in</strong>ions on chang<strong>in</strong>g the current f<strong>in</strong>ancial report<strong>in</strong>g model<br />
and associated f<strong>in</strong>ancial statement audit<br />
Change Yes No Maybe<br />
Change the current f<strong>in</strong>ancial report model to save<br />
money and <strong>in</strong>crease its value<br />
Do a full f<strong>in</strong>ancial statement audit every 2 or more<br />
years if entity has history of unqualified op<strong>in</strong>ions<br />
and no major changes to its f<strong>in</strong>ancial systems or<br />
processes or its structure<br />
89% 10% 1%<br />
55% 43% 2%<br />
amount of a CFO’s time and attention. Indeed,<br />
<strong>CFOs</strong>’ ma<strong>in</strong> concern has been to achieve an<br />
unqualified or clean audit op<strong>in</strong>ion on their<br />
annual f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements ever s<strong>in</strong>ce our<br />
survey started ask<strong>in</strong>g about priorities. This is<br />
not because of the reward for a clean op<strong>in</strong>ion,<br />
but <strong>in</strong>stead because not gett<strong>in</strong>g one can be a<br />
career breaker.<br />
Most audit and f<strong>in</strong>ancial executives understand<br />
that the value of f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements is that they<br />
show that an organization’s f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
is accurate. Most would agree that the process<br />
of prepar<strong>in</strong>g the statements and hav<strong>in</strong>g them<br />
audited has improved federal f<strong>in</strong>ancial management.<br />
Indeed, no one objects to be<strong>in</strong>g audited.<br />
But is the cost do<strong>in</strong>g these th<strong>in</strong>gs the way that<br />
they have always been done still worth it? A<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial executive <strong>in</strong> the 2011 survey sums up<br />
the dilemma this way: “You know that the government<br />
wants the money to be accounted for<br />
and the annual f<strong>in</strong>ancial statement report to get<br />
a clean op<strong>in</strong>ion, but no one is look<strong>in</strong>g at maximiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
returns on <strong>in</strong>vestment.”<br />
We asked federal executives whether they<br />
would change the current model and show<br />
their op<strong>in</strong>ions <strong>in</strong> Table 7. Nearly 9 out of 10<br />
executives would change the report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> ways<br />
that run from major to m<strong>in</strong>or. Of <strong>in</strong>terest is<br />
that we asked this same question <strong>in</strong> the 2009<br />
CFO survey and only 34% of respondents<br />
called for such changes. Just over half of<br />
respondents say that <strong>in</strong>stead of conduct<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
full audit on f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements every year,<br />
they would have it done every 2 or more years<br />
if an entity has a history of unqualified audit<br />
op<strong>in</strong>ions. There were some exceptions to this<br />
longer period, such as when an entity implements<br />
a new f<strong>in</strong>ancial system or processes or<br />
restructures its organization.<br />
“You know that the government wants the money to be<br />
accounted for and the annual f<strong>in</strong>ancial statement report to<br />
get a clean op<strong>in</strong>ion, but no one is look<strong>in</strong>g at maximiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
returns on <strong>in</strong>vestment.”<br />
—a f<strong>in</strong>ancial executive